Signal quality and Bayesian signal processing in neurofeedback based on real-time fMRI

Real-time fMRI allows analysis and visualization of the brain activity online, i.e. within one repetition time. It can be used in neurofeedback applications where subjects attempt to control an activation level in a specified region of interest (ROI) of their brain. The signal derived from the ROI is contaminated with noise and artifacts, namely with physiological noise from breathing and heart beat, scanner drift, motion-related artifacts and measurement noise. We developed a Bayesian approach to reduce noise and to remove artifacts in real-time using a modified Kalman filter. The system performs several signal processing operations: subtraction of constant and low-frequency signal components, spike removal and signal smoothing. Quantitative feedback signal quality analysis was used to estimate the quality of the neurofeedback time series and performance of the applied signal processing on different ROIs. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) across the entire time series and the group event-related SNR (eSNR) were significantly higher for the processed time series in comparison to the raw data. Applied signal processing improved the t-statistic increasing the significance of blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal changes. Accordingly, the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the feedback time series was improved as well. In addition, the data revealed increase of localized self-control across feedback sessions. The new signal processing approach provided reliable neurofeedback, performed precise artifacts removal, reduced noise, and required minimal manual adjustments of parameters. Advanced and fast online signal processing algorithms considerably increased the quality as well as the information content of the control signal which in turn resulted in higher contingency in the neurofeedback loop.

[1]  Yoshio Tanaka,et al.  Real-time functional MRI: development and emerging applications. , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[2]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Neurofeedback: A promising tool for the self-regulation of emotion networks , 2010, NeuroImage.

[3]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Dynamic Granger causality based on Kalman filter for evaluation of functional network connectivity in fMRI data , 2010, NeuroImage.

[4]  M. Gary Sayed,et al.  MRI BASIC PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS , 1997 .

[5]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Direct Instrumental Conditioning of Neural Activity Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Reward Feedback , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Saeed V. Vaseghi,et al.  Advanced Digital Signal Processing and Noise Reduction , 2006 .

[7]  R. Deichmann,et al.  Real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging: methods and applications. , 2007, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[8]  F. Jolesz,et al.  Brain–machine interface via real-time fMRI: Preliminary study on thought-controlled robotic arm , 2009, Neuroscience Letters.

[9]  Stephen LaConte,et al.  Decoding fMRI brain states in real-time , 2011, NeuroImage.

[10]  James T. Voyvodic,et al.  Real-Time fMRI Paradigm Control, Physiology, and Behavior Combined with Near Real-Time Statistical Analysis , 1999, NeuroImage.

[11]  Iven M. Y. Mareels,et al.  Nonlinear estimation of the BOLD signal , 2008, NeuroImage.

[12]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Movement‐Related effects in fMRI time‐series , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Niels Birbaumer,et al.  fMRI Brain-Computer Interface: A Tool for Neuroscientific Research and Treatment , 2007, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[14]  Michael S Beauchamp,et al.  Detection of eye movements from fMRI data , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  Wolfgang Grodd,et al.  Regulation of anterior insular cortex activity using real-time fMRI , 2007, NeuroImage.

[16]  Nikolaus Weiskopf,et al.  Single-shot compensation of image distortions and BOLD contrast optimization using multi-echo EPI for real-time fMRI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[17]  R. Turner,et al.  Characterization and Correction of Interpolation Effects in the Realignment of fMRI Time Series , 2000, NeuroImage.

[18]  X Hu,et al.  Elimination of k-space spikes in fMRI data. , 2001, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[19]  Michael Erb,et al.  Physiological self-regulation of regional brain activity using real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): methodology and exemplary data , 2003, NeuroImage.

[20]  Vladimir Nikora,et al.  Despiking Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter Data , 2002 .

[21]  S J Graham,et al.  Robust correction of spike noise: Application to diffusion tensor imaging , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric mapping , 2013 .

[23]  R. S. Hinks,et al.  Real‐time shimming to compensate for respiration‐induced B0 fluctuations , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  Alan V. Oppenheim,et al.  Discrete-Time Signal Pro-cessing , 1989 .

[25]  S C Williams,et al.  Quality control for functional magnetic resonance imaging using automated data analysis and Shewhart charting , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  A criterion for adaptive autoregressive models , 2000, Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (Cat. No.00CH37143).

[27]  G H Glover,et al.  Image‐based method for retrospective correction of physiological motion effects in fMRI: RETROICOR , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  Joseph P. Hornak,et al.  The Basics of MRI , 2003, WWW 2003.

[29]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Cortex-based real-time fMRI , 2001, NeuroImage.

[30]  D. Heeger,et al.  Linear Systems Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Human V1 , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  S. W. Roberts.  Control chart tests based on geometric moving averages , 2000 .

[32]  Markus Barth,et al.  Contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) as a quality parameter in fMRI , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[33]  Jörn Diedrichsen,et al.  Detecting and adjusting for artifacts in fMRI time series data , 2005, NeuroImage.

[34]  Sergio M. Savaresi,et al.  On the parametrization and design of an extended Kalman filter frequency tracker , 2000, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[35]  Karl Zilles,et al.  Automated quality assurance routines for fMRI data applied to a multicenter study , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[36]  Bruce R. Rosen,et al.  Spatio-temporal characteristics of low-frequency BOLD signal fluctuations in isoflurane-anesthetized rat brain , 2008, NeuroImage.

[37]  R. Veit,et al.  Self-regulation of local brain activity using real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) , 2004, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[38]  Jong-Hwan Lee,et al.  Neurofeedback fMRI-mediated learning and consolidation of regional brain activation during motor imagery , 2008 .

[39]  Daniel Gembris,et al.  Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Real-Time (FIRE) , 2000 .

[40]  S Posse,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging in real time (FIRE): Sliding‐window correlation analysis and reference‐vector optimization , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[41]  J. Lewin,et al.  Inadequacy of motion correction algorithms in functional MRI: Role of susceptibility‐induced artifacts , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[42]  R. Veit,et al.  Self‐regulation of regional cortical activity using real‐time fMRI: The right inferior frontal gyrus and linguistic processing , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[43]  Mohinder S. Grewal,et al.  Kalman Filtering: Theory and Practice Using MATLAB , 2001 .

[44]  T. Başar,et al.  A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems , 2001 .

[45]  Gary H. Glover,et al.  Learned regulation of spatially localized brain activation using real-time fMRI , 2004, NeuroImage.

[46]  K Mathiak,et al.  Evaluation of motion and realignment for functional magnetic resonance imaging in real time , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[47]  S Thesen,et al.  Prospective acquisition correction for head motion with image‐based tracking for real‐time fMRI , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[48]  R W Cox,et al.  Magnetic field changes in the human brain due to swallowing or speaking , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[49]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[50]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  Computing moment-to-moment BOLD activation for real-time neurofeedback , 2010, NeuroImage.

[51]  Niels Birbaumer,et al.  Neurofeedback and brain-computer interface clinical applications. , 2009, International review of neurobiology.

[52]  M S Cohen,et al.  Real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2001, Methods.

[53]  Niels Birbaumer,et al.  Neurofeedback and brain-computer interface clinical applications. , 2009, International review of neurobiology.

[54]  Xu Cui,et al.  Functional near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) signal improvement based on negative correlation between oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin dynamics , 2010, NeuroImage.

[55]  Georgios Tziritas,et al.  Signal segmentation and modelling based on EquiPartition principle , 2009, 2009 16th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing.

[56]  John D E Gabrieli,et al.  Control over brain activation and pain learned by using real-time functional MRI. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[57]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited—Again , 1995, NeuroImage.

[58]  Sven Haller,et al.  Real-time fMRI feedback training may improve chronic tinnitus , 2010, European Radiology.

[59]  Peter A. Robinson,et al.  BOLD responses to stimuli: Dependence on frequency, stimulus form, amplitude, and repetition rate , 2006, NeuroImage.