Two-phase gas-liquid flow properties in the hydraulic jump: Review and perspectives

Research on multiphase flows has been strongly improved over the last decades. Because of their large fields of interests and applications for chemical, hydraulic, coastal and environmental engineers and researchers, these flows have been strongly investigated. Although they are some promising and powerful numerical models and new computing tools, computations can not always solve all actual practical problems (weather forecast, wave breaking on sandy beach…). The recent and significant developments of experimental techniques such as Particle Imagery Velocimetry (PIV) and conductivity or optical probes have particularly led scientists to physical modeling that provide series of data used to calibrate numerical models. Flows with time and length scales that were not achievable in the past are now studied leading to a better description of physical mechanisms involved in mixing, diffusion and turbulence. Nevertheless, turbulence is still not well understood, particularly in two-phase flows. In the present chapter, we focus on a classical multiphase flow, the hydraulic jump. It occurs in bedrock rivers, downstream of spillways, weirs and dams, and in industrial plants. It characterizes the transition from a supercritical open-channel flow (low-depth and high velocity) to a subcritical motion (deep flow and low velocities). Experimentally, this two-phase flow can be easily studied. Furthermore, it involves fundamental physical processes such as air/water mixing and the interaction between turbulence and free surface. This flow contributes to some dissipation of the flow kinetic energy downstream of the impingement point, in a relatively short distance making it useful to minimize flood damages. It is also associated with an increase of turbulence levels and the development of large eddies with implications in terms of scour, erosion and sediment transport. These are some of the reasons that make studies on this flow particularly relevant. Although numerical and analytical studies exist, experimental investigations are still considered as the best way to improve our knowledge. After a brief description of the hydraulic jumps, the first part of this chapter aims to review some historical developments with special regards to the experimental techniques and physical modeling (similitude). In the second part, we describe and discuss the basic properties of the two-phase flow including void fraction, bubble frequency, bubble velocity and bubble size. The free surface and turbulence properties are presented as well. In the last part, we develop some conclusions, perspectives and further measurements that should be undertaken in the future.

[1]  A. Babb,et al.  Measurement of Air in Flowing Water , 1981 .

[2]  Hans J. Leutheusser,et al.  Reynolds stress measurements in hydraulic jumps , 1972 .

[3]  Hubert Chanson,et al.  Bubbly flow structure in hydraulic jump , 2007 .

[4]  Hubert Chanson,et al.  Similitude of Air Bubble Entrainment and Dispersion in Vertical Circular Plunging Jet Flows. An Experimental Study with Freshwater, Salty Freshwater and Seawater , 2002 .

[5]  Michele Mossa,et al.  Flow visualization in bubbly two-phase hydraulic jump , 1998 .

[6]  Hubert Chanson,et al.  Experimental Investigations of Air Entrainment in Transition and Skimming Flows down a Stepped Chute: Application to Embankment Overflow Stepped Spillways , 2002 .

[7]  David F. Hill,et al.  Particle Image Velocity Measurements of Undular and Hydraulic Jumps , 2006 .

[8]  Hubert Chanson,et al.  The Hydraulics of Open Channel Flow: An Introduction , 1999 .

[9]  Hubert Chanson Introduction: Introduction to Open Channel Flows , 2004 .

[10]  Hubert Chanson,et al.  Clustering process and interfacial area analysis , 2004 .

[11]  Hubert Chanson,et al.  Experimental analysis of Froude number effect on air entrainment in the hydraulic jump , 2007 .

[12]  Hubert Chanson,et al.  Air Entrainment in Two-Dimensional Turbulent Shear Flows with Partially Developed Inflow Conditions , 1995 .

[13]  Hubert Chanson,et al.  Bubble Entrainment and Dispersion in Plunging Jet Flows: Freshwater vs. Seawater , 2006 .

[14]  Hubert Chanson,et al.  Advanced post-processing and correlation analyses in high-velocity air–water flows , 2006 .

[15]  W. Wulff COMPUTATIONAL METHODS FOR MULTIPHASE FLOW , 1990 .

[16]  Hubert Chanson,et al.  Experimental assessment of scale effects affecting two-phase flow properties in hydraulic jumps , 2008 .

[17]  Willi H. Hager,et al.  Classical hydraulic jump: length of roller , 1990 .

[18]  Hubert Chanson,et al.  Current knowledge in hydraulic jumps and related phenomena: A survey of experimental results , 2009 .

[19]  Willi H. Hager,et al.  Energy Dissipators and Hydraulic Jump , 1992 .

[20]  Hubert Chanson,et al.  Air Bubble Entrainment in Hydraulic Jumps: Similitude and Scale Effects , 2006 .

[21]  H. Chanson Bubble entrainment, spray and splashing at hydraulic jumps , 2006 .

[22]  Hubert Chanson,et al.  Air-Water Time and Length Scales in Skimming Flows on a Stepped Spillway: Application to the Spray Characterisation , 2006 .

[23]  John R. Chaplin,et al.  Optical fibre probe measurements of bubbly flow in hydraulic jumps , 2005 .

[24]  Hubert Chanson,et al.  Experimental study of the air–water shear flow in a hydraulic jump , 2000 .

[25]  Hubert Chanson,et al.  Air Bubble Entrainment in Free-Surface Turbulent Shear Flows , 1996 .

[26]  John R. Chaplin,et al.  Free Surface Length Scale Estimation in Hydraulic Jumps , 2005 .

[27]  Hubert Chanson,et al.  Experimental investigation of bubbly flow and turbulence in hydraulic jumps , 2009 .

[28]  Hubert Chanson,et al.  Turbulent time and length scale measurements in high-velocity open channel flows , 2007 .

[29]  Michele Mossa,et al.  On the oscillating characteristics of hydraulic jumps , 1999 .

[30]  Hubert Chanson,et al.  Turbulence in Hydraulic Jumps: Experimental Measurements , 2007 .

[31]  K. W. Frizell,et al.  On the Performance of Velocity Measurement Techniques in Air-Water Flows , 2002 .

[32]  N. Rajaratnam,et al.  Evaluation of ADV Measurements in Bubbly Two-Phase Flows , 2002 .

[33]  Hubert Chanson,et al.  Free Surface, Bubbly flow and Turbulence Measurements in Hydraulic Jumps , 2007 .

[34]  F. J. Resch,et al.  Le ressaut hydraulique : mesures de turbulence dans la région diphasique , 1972 .

[35]  Christopher E. Brennen,et al.  Fundamentals of Multiphase Flow , 2005 .

[36]  John R. Chaplin,et al.  Air–water interface dynamic and free surface features in hydraulic jumps , 2007 .

[37]  Hubert Chanson,et al.  Air-Water Flow Measurements with Intrusive, Phase-Detection Probes: Can We Improve Their Interpretation? , 2002 .

[38]  Hubert Chanson,et al.  Similitude and scale effects of air entrainment in hydraulic jumps , 2008 .

[39]  Hubert Chanson,et al.  Clustering Process Analysis in a Large-Size Dropshaft and in a Hydraulic Jump , 2007 .

[40]  Hubert Chanson,et al.  Air–water flows down stepped chutes: turbulence and flow structure observations , 2002 .

[41]  Hubert Chanson,et al.  Dynamic similarity and scale effects affecting air bubble entrainment in hydraulic jumps , 2007 .

[42]  Hubert Chanson,et al.  An Experimental Study of Roman Dropshaft Operation : Hydraulics, Two-Phase Flow, Acoustics , 2002 .