Chest compressions versus ventilation plus chest compressions: a randomized trial in a pediatric asphyxial cardiac arrest animal model

PurposeTo compare survival, oxygenation, ventilation, and hemodynamic variables achieved with chest compressions or ventilation plus chest compressions.MethodsThis randomized experimental study was conducted in the experimental department of a university hospital. Thirty infant pigs with asphyxial cardiac arrest were randomized into two groups of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR): group 1, continuous chest compressions plus non-coordinated ventilation with a mask and mechanical ventilator (inspired oxygen fraction 0.21) (VC); group 2, chest compressions only (CC). Nine minutes of basic resuscitation was performed initially in both groups, followed by advanced resuscitation. CPR was terminated on achieving return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) or after 30 min of total resuscitation time without ROSC.ResultsThree animals (18.8%) in the VC group and 1 (7.1%) in the CC group achieved ROSC (P = 0.351). Oxygenation and ventilation during basic CPR were insufficient in both groups, though they were significantly better in the VC group than in the CC group after 9 min (PaO2, 26 vs. 19 mmHg, P = 0.008; PaCO2, 84 vs. 101 mmHg, P = 0.05). Cerebral saturation was higher in the VC group (61%) than in the CC group (30%) (P = 0.06). There were no significant differences in mean arterial pressure.ConclusionsNeither of the basic CPR protocols achieved adequate oxygenation and ventilation in this model of asphyxial pediatric cardiac arrest. Chest compressions plus ventilation produced better oxygenation, ventilation, and cerebral oxygenation with no negative hemodynamic effects. Survival was higher in the VC group, though the difference was not statistically significant.

[1]  Mark Terry,et al.  Part 13: pediatric basic life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. , 2010, Circulation.

[2]  K. Nagao Chest compression-only cardiocerebral resuscitation , 2009, Current opinion in critical care.

[3]  R. Berg,et al.  Simulated mouth-to-mouth ventilation and chest compressions (bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation) improves outcome in a swine model of prehospital pediatric asphyxial cardiac arrest. , 1999, Critical care medicine.

[4]  A. Day,et al.  Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation. , 1993, The New Zealand medical journal.

[5]  G. Ewy,et al.  Ventilation during resuscitation efforts for out-of-hospital primary cardiac arrest , 2009, Current opinion in critical care.

[6]  S. Trzeciak Conventional and chest-compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation by bystanders for children who have out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: a prospective, nationwide, population-based cohort study , 2011 .

[7]  M. J. Solana,et al.  Chest compressions versus ventilation plus chest compressions in a pediatric asphyxial cardiac arrest animal model , 2010, Intensive Care Medicine.

[8]  “Bystander” Chest Compressions and Assisted Ventilation Independently Improve Outcome From Piglet Asphyxial Pulseless “Cardiac Arrest” , 2000 .

[9]  G. Hebel Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Is ventilation necessary? , 1994 .

[10]  J. Stockman,et al.  Chest Compression–Only CPR by Lay Rescuers and Survival From Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest , 2012 .

[11]  Brad E Talley Improved Neurological Outcome with Continuous Chest Compressions Compared with 30:2 Compressions-to-Ventilations Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in a Realistic Swine Model of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest , 2008 .

[12]  M. Hazinski,et al.  Pediatric Basic and Advanced Life Support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations , 2010, Pediatrics.

[13]  R. Berg,et al.  Conventional and chest-compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation by bystanders for children who have out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: a prospective, nationwide, population-based cohort study , 2010, The Lancet.

[14]  R. Berg,et al.  Efficacy of chest compression-only BLS CPR in the presence of an occluded airway. , 1998, Resuscitation.

[15]  C. Deakin,et al.  Does compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation generate adequate passive ventilation during cardiac arrest? , 2007, Resuscitation.

[16]  K. Gruben,et al.  Observations of Ventilation During Resuscitation in a Canine Model , 1994, Circulation.

[17]  M. Vento,et al.  Resuscitation of Newborn Infants with 21% or 100% Oxygen: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2008, Neonatology.

[18]  G. Ewy,et al.  Cardiocerebral resuscitation improves neurologically intact survival of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. , 2008, Annals of emergency medicine.

[19]  Farhan Bhanji,et al.  Part 10: Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. , 2010, Circulation.

[20]  T. Kitamura Bystander CPR for paediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest , 2010 .

[21]  K. Nagao Cardiopulmonary resuscitation by bystanders with chest compression only (SOS-KANTO): an observational study , 2007, The Lancet.

[22]  M. Ong,et al.  Comparison of chest compression only and standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Singapore. , 2008, Resuscitation.

[23]  C. Otto,et al.  Assisted ventilation does not improve outcome in a porcine model of single-rescuer bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation. , 1997, Circulation.

[24]  V. Wenzel,et al.  Ventilation caused by external chest compression is unable to sustain effective gas exchange during CPR: a comparison with mechanical ventilation. , 1994, Resuscitation.

[25]  T. Kawamura,et al.  Bystander-Initiated Rescue Breathing for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests of Noncardiac Origin , 2010, Circulation.

[26]  P. Steen,et al.  Oxygen delivery and return of spontaneous circulation with ventilation:compression ratio 2:30 versus chest compressions only CPR in pigs. , 2004, Resuscitation.

[27]  D. Angus,et al.  Association between arterial hyperoxia following resuscitation from cardiac arrest and in-hospital mortality. , 2010, JAMA.

[28]  M. Sherman The new American Heart Association cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines: should children and adults have to share? , 2007, Current opinion in pediatrics.

[29]  R. Berg,et al.  Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Advances in Science, Techniques, and Outcomes , 2008, Pediatrics.

[30]  Robin Hemphill,et al.  Part 5: adult basic life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. , 2010, Circulation.

[31]  Wanchun Tang,et al.  Comparison of a 10-breaths-per-minute versus a 2-breaths-per-minute strategy during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a porcine model of cardiac arrest. , 2008, Respiratory care.

[32]  Hideharu Tanaka,et al.  Time-dependent effectiveness of chest compression-only and conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac origin. , 2011, Resuscitation.

[33]  M. Weil,et al.  Mechanical ventilation may not be essential for initial cardiopulmonary resuscitation. , 1995, Chest.

[34]  R. Berg,et al.  Effectiveness of Bystander-Initiated Cardiac-Only Resuscitation for Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest , 2007, Circulation.