The role of formal controls in facilitating information system diffusion

Information system (IS) studies highlight that IS usage, a pre-requisite for IS diffusion, may be difficult to attain when usage is voluntary because users can resist using the system. User resistance may be overcome through the application of organizational controls. Control theory explains how users' actions and practices are shaped in line with organizational guidelines and procedures. This paper reports on a qualitative case study and shows how formal control mechanisms (behavior and outcome controls) can have a positive and conclusive impact on IS diffusion. The paper makes three contributions to knowledge. First, it explains how the application of outcome control mechanisms can lead to IS diffusion despite user resistance. Second, it suggests that IS diffusion paths are iterative rather than smooth and linear. Finally, the paper demonstrates that in some contexts, despite a lack of reward expectancy, sanction expectancy can be an effective force during the IS diffusion process.

[1]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Independent Variables , 2013, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Laurie J. Kirsch,et al.  Portfolios of Control Modes and IS Project Management , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  Jimmy C. Huang,et al.  Social Capital and Knowledge Integration in an ERP Project Team: The Importance of Bridging and Bonding , 2004 .

[4]  Sue Newell,et al.  Changing the Story Surrounding Enterprise Systems to Improve our Understanding of What Makes ERP Work in Organizations , 2011 .

[5]  Sue Newell,et al.  Exploring the Importance of Participation in the Post-Implementation Period of an ES Project: A Neglected Area , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Yajiong Xue,et al.  Punishment, Justice, and Compliance in Mandatory IT Settings , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[8]  M. Patton Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[9]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[10]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[11]  Susan A. Brown,et al.  Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology , 2002, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Jacky Swan,et al.  Information systems and strategic change: a critical review of business process re-engineering , 1999 .

[13]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Extending the two‐stage information systems continuance model: incorporating UTAUT predictors and the role of context , 2011, Inf. Syst. J..

[14]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Shaping Electronic Communication: The Metastructuring of Technology in the Context of Use , 1995 .

[15]  A. Madill,et al.  Objectivity and reliability in qualitative analysis: realist, contextualist and radical constructionist epistemologies. , 2000, British journal of psychology.

[16]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Control: Organizational and Economic Approaches , 1985 .

[17]  Angel Cabrera,et al.  The key role of organizational culture in a multi-system view of technology-driven change , 2001, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[18]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  Learning to Implement Enterprise Systems: An Exploratory Study of the Dialectics of Change , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Nicolaj Siggelkow Persuasion with case studies , 2007 .

[20]  Yajiong Xue,et al.  Ensuring Employees' IT Compliance: Carrot or Stick? , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  Neil F. Doherty,et al.  The Importance of User Ownership and Positive User Attitudes in the Successful Adoption of Community Information Systems , 2001, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[22]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  Information Technology Implementers' Responses to User Resistance: Nature and Effects , 2012, MIS Q..

[23]  Darshana Sedera,et al.  Re-conceptualizing Information System Success: The IS-Impact Measurement Model , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[24]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[25]  V. G. Ouchi,et al.  A conceptual framework for the design and organizational control mechanisms , 1979 .

[26]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  A Comprehensive Conceptualization of Post-Adoptive Behaviors Associated with Information Technology Enabled Work Systems , 2005, MIS Q..

[27]  Wei Wang,et al.  ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University , 2022 .

[28]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[29]  M. N. Ravishankar,et al.  The continuity of underperforming ICT projects in the public sector , 2014, Inf. Manag..

[30]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Contemporary trends and issues in IT adoption and diffusion research , 2009, J. Inf. Technol..

[31]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Predicting Collaboration Technology Use: Integrating Technology Adoption and Collaboration Research , 2010, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[32]  M. N. Ravishankar,et al.  Rewarding End-Users for Participating in Organizational KM: A Case Study , 2008 .

[33]  Russell L. Purvis,et al.  Controlling Information Systems Development Projects: The View from the Client , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[34]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[35]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Technology use on the front line: how information technology enhances individual performance , 2007 .

[36]  Cecil Eng Huang Chua,et al.  Enacting Clan Control in Complex IT Projects: A Social Capital Perspective , 2012, MIS Q..

[37]  Peter B. Seddon,et al.  A Partial Test and Development of Delone and Mclean's Model of IS Success , 1996, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[38]  Mike Chiasson,et al.  Contextual influences on technology use mediation: a comparative analysis of electronic medical record systems , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[40]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Examining the Strategic Alignment and Implementation Success of a KMS: A Subculture-Based Multilevel Analysis , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[41]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[42]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[43]  Mary Tate,et al.  Information Systems Success Research: The "20-Year Update?" Panel Report from PACIS, 2011 , 2014, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[44]  Nathalie N. Mitev,et al.  A multiple narrative approach to information systems failure: a successful system that failed , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[45]  Bernard J. Jaworski Toward a Theory of Marketing Control: Environmental Context, Control Types, and Consequences , 1988 .

[46]  L. Kirsch The Management of Complex Tasks in Organizations: Controlling the Systems Development Process , 1996 .

[47]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  The Contingent Effects of Management Support and Task Interdependence on Successful Information Systems Implementation , 2003, MIS Q..

[48]  Yingjiu Li,et al.  Information Technology Diffusion with Influentials, Imitators, and Opponents , 2010, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[49]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Managing culture creep: Toward a strategic model of user IT culture , 2010, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[50]  R. Rothwell Towards the Fifth‐generation Innovation Process , 1994 .

[51]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[52]  Laurie J. Kirsch,et al.  Deploying Common Systems Globally: The Dynamics of Control , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[53]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  A meta-analytic assessment of the DeLone and McLean IS success model: An examination of IS success at the individual level , 2009, Inf. Manag..

[54]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Integrated Information Environment or Matrix of Control?: The Contradictory Implications of Information Technology , 2015 .

[55]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Portfolios of Control in Outsourced Software Development Projects , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..