Testing the role of solvent surface tension in protein ionization by electrospray.

This work was aimed at probing the influence of solvent surface tension on protein ionization by electrospray. In particular, we were interested in testing the previously suggested hypothesis that the charge-state distributions (CSDs) of proteins in electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) are controlled by the surface tension of the least volatile solvent component. In the attempt to minimize uncontrolled conformational effects, we used acid-sensitive proteins (cytochrome c and myoglobin) at low pH or highly stable proteins (ubiquitin and lysozyme) in the presence of low concentrations of organic solvents. A first set of experiments compared the effect of 1- and 2-propanol. These two alcohols have similar chemico-physical properties but values of vapor pressure below and above that of water, respectively. Both compounds have much lower surface tension than water. The solvents employed allowed testing of the influence of surface tension on protein spectra obtained from similarly denaturing solutions. The compared solvent conditions gave rise to very similar spectra for each tested protein. We then investigated the effect of the addition of dimethyl sulfoxide to acid-unfolded proteins. We observed enhanced ionization in the presence of acetic or formic acid, consistent with the previously described supercharging effect, but almost no shift of the CSD in the presence of HCl. Finally, we analyzed thermally denatured cytochrome c, to obtain reference spectra of the unfolded protein in high-surface-tension solutions. Also in this case, the CSD of the unfolded protein was shifted towards lower m/z values relative to low-surface-tension systems. In contrast to the other results reported here, this effect is consistent with an influence of solvent surface tension on CSD. The magnitude of the effect, however, is much smaller than predicted by the Rayleigh equation. The results presented here are not easy to reconcile with the hypothesis that the maximum charge state exhibited by proteins in ESI-MS reflects the Rayleigh-limit charge of the precursor droplet. The data are discussed with reference to models for the mechanism of electrospray ionization.

[1]  E. Williams,et al.  Effects of solvent on the maximum charge state and charge state distribution of protein ions produced by electrospray ionization , 2000, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[2]  R. Grandori.  Detecting equilibrium cytochrome c folding intermediates by electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry: Two partially folded forms populate the molten‐globule state , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[3]  M. Mann,et al.  Electrospray ionization for mass spectrometry of large biomolecules. , 1989, Science.

[4]  Brian T. Chait,et al.  Probing conformational changes in proteins by mass spectrometry , 1990 .

[5]  C. Enke,et al.  Importance of gas-phase proton affinities in determining the electrospray ionization response for analytes and solvents. , 2000, Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS.

[6]  P. Schnier,et al.  On the maximum charge state and proton transfer reactivity of peptide and protein ions formed by electrospray ionization , 1995, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[7]  P. Kebarle,et al.  Charged states of proteins. Reactions of doubly protonated alkyldiamines with NH(3): solvation or deprotonation. Extension of two proton cases to multiply protonated globular proteins observed in the gas phase. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[8]  David Schell,et al.  Charge-charge interactions are key determinants of the pK values of ionizable groups in ribonuclease Sa (pI=3.5) and a basic variant (pI=10.2). , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  Drahos,et al.  Thermal energy distribution observed in electrospray ionization , 1999, Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS.

[10]  John B. Fenn,et al.  Electrospray ionization–principles and practice , 1990 .

[11]  R. Grandori.  Electrospray-Ionization Mass Spectrometry for Protein Conformational Studies , 2003 .

[12]  E. Williams,et al.  Mechanism of charging and supercharging molecules in electrospray ionization. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[13]  J. Mora,et al.  Electrospray ionization of large multiply charged species proceeds via Dole’s charged residue mechanism , 2000 .

[14]  R. C. Mobley,et al.  Molecular Beams of Macroions , 1968 .

[15]  J. V. Iribarne,et al.  On the evaporation of small ions from charged droplets , 1976 .

[16]  Joel H. Parks,et al.  Protein fluorescence measurements within electrospray droplets , 2001, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[17]  Michael D. Daily,et al.  pK values of histidine residues in ribonuclease Sa: effect of salt and net charge. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  John Howard Perry,et al.  Chemical Engineers' Handbook , 1934 .

[19]  R. Grandori,et al.  Interpreting conformational effects in protein nano-ESI-MS spectra , 2004, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[20]  E. Williams,et al.  Supercharged protein and peptide ions formed by electrospray ionization. , 2001, Analytical chemistry.

[21]  B. Chait,et al.  Heat-induced conformational changes in proteins studied by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. , 1993, Analytical chemistry.

[22]  R. Grandori,et al.  Uncoupled analysis of secondary and tertiary protein structure by circular dichroism and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. , 2002, Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS.

[23]  V. Nesatyy,et al.  On the conformation-dependent neutralization theory and charging of individual proteins and their non-covalent complexes in the gas phase. , 2004, Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS.

[24]  B. Chait,et al.  Effects of anions on the positive ion electrospray ionization mass spectra of peptides and proteins. , 1994, Analytical chemistry.

[25]  N. Hue,et al.  Under non-denaturing solvent conditions, the mean charge state of a multiply charged protein ion formed by electrospray is linearly correlated with the macromolecular surface , 2004 .

[26]  E. Pauw,et al.  Calibration of the Internal Energy Distribution of Ions Produced by Electrospray , 1998 .

[27]  R. Grandori,et al.  Protein charge-state distributions in electrospray-ionization mass spectrometry do not appear to be limited by the surface tension of the solvent. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[28]  P. Schnier,et al.  ELECTROSTATIC FORCES AND DIELECTRIC POLARIZABILITY OF MULTIPLY PROTONATED GAS-PHASE CYTOCHROME C IONS PROBED BY ION/MOLECULE CHEMISTRY , 1995 .

[29]  A. Dobó,et al.  Protein—Ion Charge-State Distributions in Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry: Distinguishing Conformational Contributions from Masking Effects , 2002 .

[30]  Rita Grandori,et al.  Origin of the conformation dependence of protein charge-state distributions in electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. , 2003, Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS.