Learning to Compare with Few Data for Personalised Human Activity Recognition

Recent advances in meta-learning provides interesting opportunities for CBR research, in similarity learning, case comparison and personalised recommendations. Rather than learning a single model for a specific task, meta-learners adopt a generalist view of learning-to-learn, such that models are rapidly transferable to related (but different) new tasks. Unlike task-specific model training, a meta-learner’s training instance - referred to as a meta-instance - is a composite of two sets: a support set and a query set of instances. In our work, we introduce learning-to-learn personalised models from few data. We motivate our contribution through an application where personalisation plays an important role, mainly that of human activity recognition for self-management of chronic diseases. We extend the meta-instance creation process where random sampling of support and query sets is carried out on a reduced sample conditioned by a domain-specific attribute; namely the person or user, in order to create meta-instances for personalised HAR. Our meta-learning for personalisation is compared with several state-of-the-art meta-learning strategies: 1) matching network (MN), which learns an embedding for a metric function; 2) relation network (RN) that learns to predict similarity between paired instances; and 3) MAML, a model-agnostic machine-learning algorithm that optimizes the model parameters for rapid adaptation. Results confirm that personalised meta-learning significantly improves performance over non personalised meta-learners.

[1]  Luigi Portinale,et al.  Diabetic patients management exploiting case-based reasoning techniques , 2000, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[2]  Agnar Aamodt,et al.  Case Representation and Similarity Assessment in the selfBACK Decision Support System , 2016, LWDA.

[3]  Oriol Vinyals,et al.  Matching Networks for One Shot Learning , 2016, NIPS.

[4]  Joshua Achiam,et al.  On First-Order Meta-Learning Algorithms , 2018, ArXiv.

[5]  Nir Ailon,et al.  Deep Metric Learning Using Triplet Network , 2014, SIMBAD.

[6]  Jacqui H Morris,et al.  Interventions to promote long-term participation in physical activity after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. , 2014, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  Didier Stricker,et al.  Introducing a New Benchmarked Dataset for Activity Monitoring , 2012, 2012 16th International Symposium on Wearable Computers.

[8]  Stewart Massie,et al.  Designing a Personalised Case-Based Recommender System for Mobile Self-Management of Diabetes During Exercise , 2017, KHD@IJCAI.

[9]  Nirmalie Wiratunga,et al.  A knowledge-light approach to personalised and open-ended human activity recognition , 2020, Knowl. Based Syst..

[10]  Tao Xiang,et al.  Learning to Compare: Relation Network for Few-Shot Learning , 2017, 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[11]  Yann LeCun,et al.  Signature Verification Using A "Siamese" Time Delay Neural Network , 1993, Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell..

[12]  Richard S. Zemel,et al.  Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learning , 2017, NIPS.

[13]  Ricardo Chavarriaga,et al.  The Opportunity challenge: A benchmark database for on-body sensor-based activity recognition , 2013, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[14]  Cynthia R. Marling,et al.  Emerging Applications for Intelligent Diabetes Management , 2011, AI Mag..

[15]  Amos Storkey,et al.  Meta-Learning in Neural Networks: A Survey , 2020, IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence.

[16]  Sergey Levine,et al.  Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networks , 2017, ICML.

[17]  Kerstin Bach,et al.  Learning to Recognise Exercises in the Self-Management of Low Back Pain , 2020, FLAIRS.