Evaluation of CMIP5 Earth System Models for the Spatial Patterns of Biomass and Soil Carbon Turnover Times and Their Linkage with Climate

Earth system models (ESMs) from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) were diagnosed as having large discrepancies in their land carbon turnover times, which partly explains the differences in the future projections of terrestrial carbon storage from the models. Carvalhais et al. focused on evaluation of model-based ecosystem carbon turnover times τeco in relation with climate factors. In this study, τeco from models was analyzed separately for biomass and soil carbon pools, and its spatial dependency upon temperature and precipitation was evaluated using observational datasets. The results showed that 8 of 14 models slightly underestimated global biomass carbon turnover times τveg (modeled median of 8 yr vs observed 11 yr), and 11 models grossly underestimated the soil carbon turnover time τsoil (modeled median of 16 yr vs observed 26 yr). The underestimation of global carbon turnover times in ESMs was mainly due to values for τveg and τsoil being too low in the high northern latitudes and arid and semiarid regions. In addition, the models did not capture the observed spatial climate sensitivity of carbon turnover time in these regions. Modeled τveg and τsoil values were generally weakly correlated with climate variables, implying that differences between carbon cycle models primarily originated from structural differences rather than from differences in atmospheric climate models (i.e., related to temperature and precipitation). This study indicates that most models do not reproduce the underlying processes driving regional τveg and τsoil, highlighting the need for improving the model parameterization and adding key processes such as biotic disturbances and permafrost–carbon climate responses.

[1]  G. Bonan,et al.  Carbon cycle confidence and uncertainty: Exploring variation among soil biogeochemical models , 2018, Global change biology.

[2]  D. Lawrence,et al.  Higher climatological temperature sensitivity of soil carbon in cold than warm climates , 2017 .

[3]  Shaun Quegan,et al.  Evaluation of climate‐related carbon turnover processes in global vegetation models for boreal and temperate forests , 2017, Global change biology.

[4]  H. Haberl,et al.  Biomass turnover time in terrestrial ecosystems halved by land use , 2016 .

[5]  J. Lynch,et al.  Key ecological responses to nitrogen are altered by climate change , 2016 .

[6]  G. Bonan,et al.  Managing uncertainty in soil carbon feedbacks to climate change , 2016 .

[7]  C. Schmullius,et al.  Large‐scale variation in boreal and temperate forest carbon turnover rate related to climate , 2016 .

[8]  N. Batjes.  Harmonized soil property values for broad-scale modelling (WISE30sec) with estimates of global soil carbon stocks , 2016 .

[9]  J. Canadell,et al.  Greening of the Earth and its drivers , 2016 .

[10]  Steven W. Running,et al.  Large divergence of satellite and Earth system model estimates of global terrestrial CO2 fertilization , 2016 .

[11]  Nuno Carvalhais,et al.  Enhanced seasonal CO2 exchange caused by amplified plant productivity in northern ecosystems , 2016, Science.

[12]  Liang Feng,et al.  The decadal state of the terrestrial carbon cycle: Global retrievals of terrestrial carbon allocation, pools, and residence times , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Global Carbon Budget 2015 , 2015 .

[14]  N. McDowell,et al.  Tree mortality from drought, insects, and their interactions in a changing climate. , 2015, The New phytologist.

[15]  Pierre Friedlingstein,et al.  Controls on terrestrial carbon feedbacks by productivity versus turnover in the CMIP5 Earth System Models , 2015 .

[16]  J. Randerson,et al.  Radiocarbon constraints imply reduced carbon uptake by soils during the 21st century , 2015, Science.

[17]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Global patterns and controls of soil organic carbon dynamics as simulated by multiple terrestrial biosphere models: Current status and future directions , 2015, Global biogeochemical cycles.

[18]  Matthew F. McCabe,et al.  Recent reversal in loss of global terrestrial biomass , 2015 .

[19]  Yadvinder Malhi,et al.  A comparison of plot‐based satellite and Earth system model estimates of tropical forest net primary production , 2015 .

[20]  D. M. Lawrence,et al.  Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback , 2014, Nature.

[21]  Shan Xu,et al.  Soil respiration under climate warming: differential response of heterotrophic and autotrophic respiration , 2014, Global change biology.

[22]  Maurizio Santoro,et al.  Global covariation of carbon turnover times with climate in terrestrial ecosystems , 2014, Nature.

[23]  A. Anthony Bloom,et al.  Constraining ecosystem carbon dynamics in a data-limited world: integrating ecological "common sense" in a model-data fusion framework , 2014 .

[24]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Where does the carbon go? A model–data intercomparison of vegetation carbon allocation and turnover processes at two temperate forest free-air CO2 enrichment sites , 2014, The New phytologist.

[25]  P. Jones,et al.  Updated high‐resolution grids of monthly climatic observations – the CRU TS3.10 Dataset , 2014 .

[26]  Ranga B. Myneni,et al.  A two-fold increase of carbon cycle sensitivity to tropical temperature variations , 2014, Nature.

[27]  Pierre Friedlingstein,et al.  Uncertainties in CMIP5 Climate Projections due to Carbon Cycle Feedbacks , 2014 .

[28]  F. Woodward,et al.  Carbon residence time dominates uncertainty in terrestrial vegetation responses to future climate and atmospheric CO2 , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  J. Randerson,et al.  Changes in soil organic carbon storage predicted by Earth system models during the 21st century , 2013 .

[30]  Yiqi Luo,et al.  Scale-Dependent Performance of CMIP5 Earth System Models in Simulating Terrestrial Vegetation Carbon* , 2015 .

[31]  P. Cox,et al.  Evaluating the Land and Ocean Components of the Global Carbon Cycle in the CMIP5 Earth System Models , 2013 .

[32]  C. Jones,et al.  Estimating the Permafrost-Carbon Climate Response in the CMIP5 Climate Models Using a Simplified Approach , 2013 .

[33]  M. Lomas,et al.  Evaluation of terrestrial carbon cycle models for their response to climate variability and to CO2 trends , 2013, Global change biology.

[34]  R. Seager,et al.  Temperature as a potent driver of regional forest drought stress and tree mortality , 2013 .

[35]  P. Cox,et al.  Sensitivity of tropical carbon to climate change constrained by carbon dioxide variability , 2013, Nature.

[36]  J. Randerson,et al.  Causes of variation in soil carbon simulations from CMIP5 Earth system models and comparison with observations , 2012 .

[37]  Dean N. Williams,et al.  The Earth System Grid Federation: An open infrastructure for access to distributed geospatial data , 2012, 2012 IEEE 8th International Conference on E-Science.

[38]  J. Canadell,et al.  The Northern Circumpolar Soil Carbon Database: spatially distributed datasets of soil coverage and soil carbon storage in the northern permafrost regions , 2012 .

[39]  Karl E. Taylor,et al.  An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design , 2012 .

[40]  Jerry F. Franklin,et al.  Causes and implications of the correlation between forest productivity and tree mortality rates , 2011 .

[41]  R. Corlett,et al.  Impacts of warming on tropical lowland rainforests. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[42]  Yi Y. Liu,et al.  Global long‐term passive microwave satellite‐based retrievals of vegetation optical depth , 2011 .

[43]  P. Ciais,et al.  Permafrost carbon-climate feedbacks accelerate global warming , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  W. Salas,et al.  Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  Christopher J. Still,et al.  Forest responses to increasing aridity and warmth in the southwestern United States , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  Maosheng Zhao,et al.  Drought-Induced Reduction in Global Terrestrial Net Primary Production from 2000 Through 2009 , 2010, Science.

[47]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  Reduction of forest soil respiration in response to nitrogen deposition , 2010 .

[48]  N. McDowell,et al.  A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests , 2010 .

[49]  Damien Sulla-Menashe,et al.  MODIS Collection 5 global land cover: Algorithm refinements and characterization of new datasets , 2010 .

[50]  S. Niu,et al.  Nitrogen effects on net ecosystem carbon exchange in a temperate steppe , 2010 .

[51]  J. Canadell,et al.  Soil organic carbon pools in the northern circumpolar permafrost region , 2009 .

[52]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  Evaluation of the terrestrial carbon cycle, future plant geography and climate‐carbon cycle feedbacks using five Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVMs) , 2008 .

[53]  S. Sitch,et al.  The role of fire disturbance for global vegetation dynamics: coupling fire into a Dynamic Global Vegetation Model , 2008 .

[54]  J. Hicke,et al.  Cross-scale Drivers of Natural Disturbances Prone to Anthropogenic Amplification: The Dynamics of Bark Beetle Eruptions , 2008 .

[55]  Michael L. Goulden,et al.  Are tropical forests near a high temperature threshold , 2008 .

[56]  D. Robinson.  Implications of a large global root biomass for carbon sink estimates and for soil carbon dynamics , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[57]  N. Stephenson,et al.  Apparent climatically induced increase of tree mortality rates in a temperate forest. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[58]  R. Schnur,et al.  Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis: Results from the C , 2006 .

[59]  A. Prokushkin,et al.  Critical analysis of root : shoot ratios in terrestrial biomes , 2006 .

[60]  Simon J. Ussher,et al.  Iron in the Sargasso Sea (Bermuda Atlantic Time‐series Study region) during summer: Eolian imprint, spatiotemporal variability, and ecological implications , 2005 .

[61]  G. Likens,et al.  The Biogeochemistry of Carbon at Hubbard Brook , 2005 .

[62]  E. S. Tribuzy.  Variações da temperatura foliar do dossel e o seu efeito na taxa assimilatória de CO2 na Amazônia Central. , 2005 .

[63]  T. D. Mitchell,et al.  An improved method of constructing a database of monthly climate observations and associated high‐resolution grids , 2005 .

[64]  Maosheng Zhao,et al.  Improvements of the MODIS terrestrial gross and net primary production global data set , 2005 .

[65]  P. Ciais,et al.  Multiple constraints on regional CO2 flux variations over land and oceans , 2005 .

[66]  Michael J. Rogers,et al.  Long-term sensitivity of soil carbon turnover to warming , 2005, Nature.

[67]  C. Tucker,et al.  Climate-Driven Increases in Global Terrestrial Net Primary Production from 1982 to 1999 , 2003, Science.

[68]  Jerry M. Melillo,et al.  Soil Warming and Carbon-Cycle Feedbacks to the Climate System , 2002, Science.

[69]  F. Woodward,et al.  Global response of terrestrial ecosystem structure and function to CO2 and climate change: results from six dynamic global vegetation models , 2001 .

[70]  P. Jones,et al.  Representing Twentieth-Century Space-Time Climate Variability. Part II: Development of 1901-96 Monthly Grids of Terrestrial Surface Climate , 2000 .

[71]  Philip W. Jones.  First- and Second-Order Conservative Remapping Schemes for Grids in Spherical Coordinates , 1999 .

[72]  Jerry F. Franklin,et al.  Tree Death as an Ecological Process , 1987 .

[73]  Shutao Chen,et al.  Mean residence time of global topsoil organic carbon depends on temperature, precipitation and soil nitrogen , 2013 .

[74]  V. Weisskopf.  THE INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS , 2022 .