Using Red List Indices to measure progress towards the 2010 target and beyond

The World Conservation Union (IUCN) Red List is widely recognized as the most authoritative and objective system for classifying species by their risk of extinction. Red List Indices (RLIs) illustrate the relative rate at which a particular set of species change in overall threat status (i.e. projected relative extinction-risk), based on population and range size and trends as quantified by Red List categories. RLIs can be calculated for any representative set of species that has been fully assessed at least twice. They are based on the number of species in each Red List category, and the number changing categories between assessments as a result of genuine improvement or deterioration in status. RLIs show a fairly coarse level of resolution, but for fully assessed taxonomic groups they are highly representative, being based on information from a high proportion of species worldwide. The RLI for the world's birds shows that that their overall threat status has deteriorated steadily during the years 1988–2004 in all biogeographic realms and ecosystems. A preliminary RLI for amphibians for 1980–2004 shows similar rates of decline. RLIs are in development for other groups. In addition, a sampled index is being developed, based on a stratified sample of species from all major taxonomic groups, realms and ecosystems. This will provide extinction-risk trends that are more representative of all biodiversity.

[1]  Robert M. May,et al.  How Many Species Inhabit the Earth , 1992 .

[2]  A. Cuarón.  Extinction rate estimates , 1993, Nature.

[3]  R. May,et al.  Estimating extinction rates , 1993, Nature.

[4]  Alison J. Stattersfield,et al.  Birds to watch 2 : the world list of threatened birds , 1996 .

[5]  Herbert H. T. Prins,et al.  Species Conservation: The 1994 IUCN Red List categories discussed , 1999 .

[6]  C. Scott Findlay,et al.  Quantitative evidence for global amphibian population declines , 2000, Nature.

[7]  D. Simberloff.  Threatened Birds of the World BirdLife International , 2001 .

[8]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  Threatened Birds of the World , 2001 .

[9]  J. Tobias,et al.  Threatened Birds of Asia: The BirdLife International Red Data Book. Collar, N.J., (Editor-in-chief), Andreev, A.V., Chan, S., Crosby, M.J., Subramanya, S. and Tobias, J.A. Maps by Rudyanto and M. J. Crosby. BirdLife International, Cambridge. 3,038 pages, in two volumes, £55.00. , 2001, Bird Conservation International.

[10]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Limits to the use of threatened species lists , 2002 .

[11]  Martin Jenkins,et al.  World Atlas of Biodiversity: Earth's Living Resources in the 21st Century , 2002 .

[12]  Mark A. Burgman,et al.  TURNER REVIEW No. 5 Are listed threatened plant species actually at risk , 2002 .

[13]  Mark A. Burgman,et al.  Are listed threatened plant species actually at risk , 2002 .

[14]  H. Resit Akçakaya,et al.  Value of the IUCN Red List , 2003 .

[15]  R. Field,et al.  Using birds as indicators of biodiversity , 2003 .

[16]  H. Resit Akçakaya,et al.  Measuring Global Trends in the Status of Biodiversity: Red List Indices for Birds , 2004, PLoS biology.

[17]  M. Vences,et al.  Redescriptions of Two Toad Species of the Genus Atelopus from Coastal Venezuela , 2004, Copeia.

[18]  Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria , 2005 .