Ecological community description using the food web, species abundance, and body size

Measuring the numerical abundance and average body size of individuals of each species in an ecological community's food web reveals new patterns and illuminates old ones. This approach is illustrated using data from the pelagic community of a small lake: Tuesday Lake, Michigan, United States. Body mass varies almost 12 orders of magnitude. Numerical abundance varies almost 10 orders of magnitude. Biomass abundance (average body mass times numerical abundance) varies only 5 orders of magnitude. A new food web graph, which plots species and trophic links in the plane spanned by body mass and numerical abundance, illustrates the nearly inverse relationship between body mass and numerical abundance, as well as the pattern of energy flow in the community. Species with small average body mass occur low in the food web of Tuesday Lake and are numerically abundant. Larger-bodied species occur higher in the food web and are numerically rarer. Average body size explains more of the variation in numerical abundance than does trophic height. The trivariate description of an ecological community by using the food web, average body sizes, and numerical abundance includes many well studied bivariate and univariate relationships based on subsets of these three variables. We are not aware of any single community for which all of these relationships have been analyzed simultaneously. Our approach demonstrates the connectedness of ecological patterns traditionally treated as independent. Moreover, knowing the food web gives new insight into the disputed form of the allometric relationship between body mass and abundance.

[1]  Peter S. Maitland,et al.  The trophic cascade in lakes , 1998 .

[2]  D. O. Logofet.  Matrix Population Models: Construction, Analysis, and Interpretation , 2002 .

[3]  A. Heusner.  Energy metabolism and body size. I. Is the 0.75 mass exponent of Kleiber's equation a statistical artifact? , 1982, Respiration physiology.

[4]  Thomas W. Schoener,et al.  Food Webs From the Small to the Large: The Robert H. MacArthur Award Lecture , 1989 .

[5]  J. Damuth,et al.  Population density and body size in mammals , 1981, Nature.

[6]  G. Polis,et al.  Food webs: integration of patterns and dynamics , 1997 .

[7]  J. Downing,et al.  Population density and community size structure: Comparison of aquatic and terrestrial systems , 1997 .

[8]  S. Goldhor.  Ecology , 1964, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[9]  A. Vézina.  Empirical relationships between predator and prey size among terrestrial vertebrate predators , 1985, Oecologia.

[10]  R. W. Sheldon,et al.  Structure of Pelagic Food Chain and Relationship Between Plankton and Fish Production , 1977 .

[11]  R. W. Sheldon,et al.  The Size Distribution of Particles in the OCEAN1 , 1972 .

[12]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  A Common Rule for the Scaling of Carnivore Density , 2002, Science.

[13]  James H. Brown,et al.  Allometric scaling of plant energetics and population density , 1998, Nature.

[14]  K. Gaston,et al.  The Relationship between Animal Abundance and Body Size: A Review of the Mechanisms , 1999 .

[15]  J. Weitz,et al.  Re-examination of the "3/4-law" of metabolism. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  Resilience and Resistance of a Lake Phosphorus Cycle Before and After Food Web Manipulation , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[17]  J. Downing,et al.  Density-body size relationships in local aquatic communities , 1997 .

[18]  R. Peters.  The Ecological Implications of Body Size , 1983 .

[19]  M. Kleiber.  Body size and metabolism , 1932 .

[20]  H. Caswell.  Matrix population models : construction, analysis, and interpretation , 2001 .

[21]  N. Naumov.  The ecology of animals , 1974 .

[22]  R. Peters,et al.  The effect of body size on animal abundance , 1983, Oecologia.