Dynamic hybrid life cycle assessment of energy and carbon of multicrystalline silicon photovoltaic systems.

This paper advances the life cycle assessment (LCA) of photovoltaic systems by expanding the boundary of the included processes using hybrid LCA and accounting for the technology-driven dynamics of embodied energy and carbon emissions. Hybrid LCA is an extended method that combines bottom-up process-sum and top-down economic input-output (EIO) methods. In 2007, the embodied energy was 4354 MJ/m(2) and the energy payback time (EPBT) was 2.2 years for a multicrystalline silicon PV system under 1700 kWh/m(2)/yr of solar radiation. These results are higher than those of process-sum LCA by approximately 60%, indicating that processes excluded in process-sum LCA, such as transportation, are significant. Even though PV is a low-carbon technology, the difference between hybrid and process-sum results for 10% penetration of PV in the U.S. electrical grid is 0.13% of total current grid emissions. Extending LCA from the process-sum to hybrid analysis makes a significant difference. Dynamics are characterized through a retrospective analysis and future outlook for PV manufacturing from 2001 to 2011. During this decade, the embodied carbon fell substantially, from 60 g CO(2)/kWh in 2001 to 21 g/kWh in 2011, indicating that technological progress is realizing reductions in embodied environmental impacts as well as lower module price.

[1]  Varun,et al.  Life cycle assessment of solar PV based electricity generation systems: A review , 2010 .

[2]  Evert Nieuwlaar,et al.  Energy viability of photovoltaic systems , 2000 .

[3]  C. Hendrickson,et al.  Using input-output analysis to estimate economy-wide discharges , 1995 .

[4]  Erik Alsema,et al.  Energy requirements of thin-film solar cell modules—a review , 1998 .

[5]  Kazuhiko Kato,et al.  An evaluation on the life cycle of photovoltaic energy system considering production energy of off-grade silicon , 1997 .

[6]  W. Leontief.  Environmental Repercussions and the Economic Structure: An Input-Output Approach , 1970 .

[7]  Hyung Chul Kim,et al.  Emissions from photovoltaic life cycles. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  L. P. Hunt.  Total energy use in the production of silicon solar cells from raw materials to finished product , 1976 .

[9]  Eric Williams,et al.  Energy intensity of computer manufacturing: hybrid assessment combining process and economic input-output methods. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Anna Stoppato,et al.  Life cycle assessment of photovoltaic electricity generation , 2008 .

[11]  E. A. Alsema,et al.  THE REAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF CRYSTALLINE SILICON PV MODULES: AN ANALYSIS BASED ON UP-TO-DATE MANUFACTURERS DATA , 2005 .

[12]  E. Alsema,et al.  Environmental Impact of Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Module Production , 2005 .

[13]  C. Bullard,et al.  The energy cost of goods and services , 1975 .

[14]  Robert G. Hunt,et al.  Managing Uncertainty in Life Cycle Inventories , 1997 .

[15]  Gregory F. Nemet,et al.  Beyond the learning curve: factors influencing cost reductions in photovoltaics , 2006 .

[16]  E. A. Alsema,et al.  Reduction of Environmental Impacts in Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Technology: An Analysis of Driving Forces and Opportunities , 2007 .

[17]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  Parameters affecting the life cycle performance of PV technologies and systems , 2007 .

[18]  Arpad Horvath,et al.  Economic Input–Output Models for Environmental Life-Cycle Assessment , 1998 .

[19]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  A generic method for the identification of options for cleaner products , 1994 .