Hospital volume and outcomes after radical prostatectomy: a national population-based study using patient-reported urinary continence and sexual function

[1]  S. Mungovan,et al.  Surgeon case volume and continence recovery following radical prostatectomy: a systematic review , 2020, ANZ journal of surgery.

[2]  David I. Lee,et al.  Associations Between Hospital Volume and Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. , 2019, The Journal of urology.

[3]  H. Samaratunga,et al.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study. , 2018, The Lancet. Oncology.

[4]  N. Clarke,et al.  Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy vs laparoscopic and open retropubic radical prostatectomy: functional outcomes 18 months after diagnosis from a national cohort study in England , 2018, British Journal of Cancer.

[5]  N. Clarke,et al.  Determinants of Patient Mobility for Prostate Cancer Surgery: A Population-based Study of Choice and Competition. , 2017, European urology.

[6]  Steven L. Chang,et al.  Systematic Review of the Volume-Outcome Relationship for Radical Prostatectomy. , 2017, European urology focus.

[7]  B. Beyer,et al.  Short- and Long-term Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life after Radical Prostatectomy: Patient-reported Outcomes from a Tertiary High-volume Center. , 2017, European urology focus.

[8]  A. Purushotham,et al.  Effect of patient choice and hospital competition on service configuration and technology adoption within cancer surgery: a national, population-based study , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[9]  M. Wirth,et al.  High volume is the key for improving in-hospital outcomes after radical prostatectomy: a total population analysis in Germany from 2006 to 2013 , 2017, World Journal of Urology.

[10]  Robert A Gardiner,et al.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study , 2016, The Lancet.

[11]  M. Barry,et al.  Patient-reported Functional Outcomes Following Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Performed by High-volume Surgeons at High-volume Hospitals. , 2016, European urology focus.

[12]  Lena Osterhagen,et al.  Multiple Imputation For Nonresponse In Surveys , 2016 .

[13]  J. Kelly,et al.  Achieving Quality Assurance of Prostate Cancer Surgery During Reorganisation of Cancer Services. , 2015, European urology.

[14]  John T. Wei,et al.  Minimally important difference for the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form. , 2015, Urology.

[15]  Jens Hansen,et al.  Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample. , 2012, European urology.

[16]  Patrick Royston,et al.  Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice , 2011, Statistics in medicine.

[17]  Martin G Sanda,et al.  Development and validation of an abbreviated version of the expanded prostate cancer index composite instrument for measuring health-related quality of life among prostate cancer survivors. , 2010, Urology.

[18]  J. van der Meulen,et al.  Identifying co‐morbidity in surgical patients using administrative data with the Royal College of Surgeons Charlson Score , 2010, The British journal of surgery.

[19]  D. Lubeck,et al.  Differences in urologist and patient assessments of health related quality of life in men with prostate cancer: results of the CaPSURE database. , 1998, The Journal of urology.