A computational approach to high-resolution imaging of the living human retina without hardware adaptive optics

We demonstrate high-resolution imaging of the living human retina by computationally correcting highorder ocular aberrations. These corrections are performed post-acquisition and without the need for a deformable mirror or wavefront sensor that are commonly employed in hardware adaptive optics (HAO) systems. With the introduction of HAO to ophthalmic imaging, high-resolution near diffraction-limited imaging of the living human retina has become possible. The combination of a deformable mirror, wavefront sensor, and supporting hardware/software, though, can more than double the cost of the underlying imaging modality, in addition to significantly increasing the system complexity and sensitivity to misalignment. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) allows 3-D imaging in addition to naturally providing the complex optical field of backscattered light. This is unlike a scanning laser ophthalmoscope which measures only the intensity of the backscattered light. Previously, our group has demonstrated the utility of a technique called computational adaptive optics (CAO) which utilizes the complex field measured with OCT to computationally correct for optical aberrations in a manner similar to HAO. Until now, CAO has been applied to ex vivo imaging and in vivo skin imaging. Here, we demonstrate in vivo imaging of cone photoreceptors using CAO. Additional practical considerations such as imaging speed, and stability are discussed.

[1]  Stephen A. Boppart,et al.  Broadband optical interferometric tomography with computational adaptive optics using 'guide stars' , 2012 .

[2]  Stephen A. Boppart,et al.  Real-time in vivo computed optical interferometric tomography , 2013, Nature Photonics.

[3]  Teresa C. Chen,et al.  In vivo dynamic human retinal blood flow imaging using ultra-high-speed spectral domain optical Doppler tomography , 2003 .

[4]  Wolfgang Drexler,et al.  Numerical focusing methods for full field OCT: a comparison based on a common signal model. , 2014, Optics express.

[5]  Nathan D. Shemonski,et al.  Three-dimensional motion correction using speckle and phase for in vivo computed optical interferometric tomography. , 2014, Biomedical optics express.

[6]  Daniel L Marks,et al.  Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Microscopy , 2007, OFC/NFOEC 2008 - 2008 Conference on Optical Fiber Communication/National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference.

[7]  Adeel Ahmad,et al.  Computational adaptive optics for broadband optical interferometric tomography of biological tissue , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Stephen A. Boppart,et al.  Phase stability technique for inverse scattering in optical coherence tomography , 2006, 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro, 2006..

[9]  Nathan D. Shemonski,et al.  Stability in computed optical interferometric tomography (part I): stability requirements. , 2014, Optics express.

[10]  D. Hubel,et al.  The role of fixational eye movements in visual perception , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[11]  Peter Koch,et al.  Efficient holoscopy image reconstruction. , 2012, Optics express.

[12]  Nathan D. Shemonski,et al.  Stability in computed optical interferometric tomography (Part II): in vivo stability assessment. , 2014, Optics express.

[13]  Stephen A. Boppart,et al.  Computed optical interferometric tomography for high-speed volumetric cellular imaging , 2014 .

[14]  Barry Cense,et al.  In vivo dynamic human retinal blood flow imaging using ultra-high-speed spectral domain optical coherence tomography. , 2003, Optics express.

[15]  Wolfgang Drexler,et al.  Subaperture correlation based digital adaptive optics for full field optical coherence tomography. , 2013, Optics express.