T-cell activation: A queuing theory analysis at low agonist density.

We analyze a simple linear triggering model of the T-cell receptor (TCR) within the framework of queuing theory, in which TCRs enter the queue upon full activation and exit by downregulation. We fit our model to four experimentally characterized threshold activation criteria and analyze their specificity and sensitivity: the initial calcium spike, cytotoxicity, immunological synapse formation, and cytokine secretion. Specificity characteristics improve as the time window for detection increases, saturating for time periods on the timescale of downregulation; thus, the calcium spike (30 s) has low specificity but a sensitivity to single-peptide MHC ligands, while the cytokine threshold (1 h) can distinguish ligands with a 30% variation in the complex lifetime. However, a robustness analysis shows that these properties are degraded when the queue parameters are subject to variation-for example, under stochasticity in the ligand number in the cell-cell interface and population variation in the cellular threshold. A time integration of the queue over a period of hours is shown to be able to control parameter noise efficiently for realistic parameter values when integrated over sufficiently long time periods (hours), the discrimination characteristics being determined by the TCR signal cascade kinetics (a kinetic proofreading scheme). Therefore, through a combination of thresholds and signal integration, a T cell can be responsive to low ligand density and specific to agonist quality. We suggest that multiple threshold mechanisms are employed to establish the conditions for efficient signal integration, i.e., coordinate the formation of a stable contact interface.

[1]  Michael Loran Dustin,et al.  Low Affinity Interaction of Human or Rat T Cell Adhesion Molecule CD2 with Its Ligand Aligns Adhering Membranes to Achieve High Physiological Affinity* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[2]  S. Miller,et al.  Arresting autoimmunity by blocking β-arrestin 1 , 2007, Nature Immunology.

[3]  M. Davis,et al.  Differential clustering of CD4 and CD3zeta during T cell recognition. , 2000, Science.

[4]  Arup K Chakraborty,et al.  The Immunological Synapse Balances T Cell Receptor Signaling and Degradation , 2003, Science.

[5]  G. Mayr,et al.  Knock-down of the Type 3 Ryanodine Receptor Impairs Sustained Ca2+ Signaling via the T Cell Receptor/CD3 Complex* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[6]  Y. Chien,et al.  A TCR binds to antagonist ligands with lower affinities and faster dissociation rates than to agonists. , 1996, Immunity.

[7]  S. Latour,et al.  Negative regulation of immunoreceptor signaling. , 2002, Annual review of immunology.

[8]  M. Davis,et al.  Kinetic discrimination in T-cell activation. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  R. Germain,et al.  Relationships among TCR ligand potency, thresholds for effector function elicitation, and the quality of early signaling events in human T cells. , 1998, Journal of immunology.

[10]  C. Surh,et al.  Autologous Regulation of Naive T Cell Homeostasis Within the T Cell Compartment1 , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[11]  E. Bröcker,et al.  Antigen presentation in extracellular matrix: interactions of T cells with dendritic cells are dynamic, short lived, and sequential. , 2000, Immunity.

[12]  W. S. Hlavacek,et al.  Investigation of Early Events in FcεRI-Mediated Signaling Using a Detailed Mathematical Model1 , 2003, The Journal of Immunology.

[13]  J. Schatzle,et al.  Stepwise cytoskeletal polarization as a series of checkpoints in innate but not adaptive cytolytic killing , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  G. Dupont,et al.  New mechanisms and functions in Ca2+ signalling , 2004, Biology of the cell.

[15]  J. Carneiro,et al.  A mathematical analysis of TCR serial triggering and down‐regulation , 2000, European journal of immunology.

[16]  Stephen P. Schoenberger,et al.  Dynamic programming of CD8+ T lymphocyte responses , 2003, Nature Immunology.

[17]  S. Jameson,et al.  Interleukin-7 mediates the homeostasis of naïve and memory CD8 T cells in vivo , 2000, Nature Immunology.

[18]  A. Trautmann,et al.  Ca2+ signals and T lymphocytes “New mechanisms and functions in Ca2+ signalling” , 2004, Biology of the cell.

[19]  A. Lanzavecchia,et al.  Signal extinction and T cell repolarization in T helper cell‐antigen‐presenting cell conjugates , 1996, European journal of immunology.

[20]  J. Hopfield Kinetic proofreading: a new mechanism for reducing errors in biosynthetic processes requiring high specificity. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Daniel Coombs,et al.  Supplementary information for Activated TCRs remain marked for internalization after dissociation from pMHC , 2022 .

[22]  C. Janeway,et al.  Cross-antagonism of a T cell clone expressing two distinct T cell receptors. , 1999, Immunity.

[23]  Cliburn Chan,et al.  Cooperative enhancement of specificity in a lattice of T cell receptors , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  D. Zaller,et al.  Staging and resetting T cell activation in SMACs , 2002, Nature Immunology.

[25]  Bernhard Hemmer,et al.  TCR ligand discrimination is enforced by competing ERK positive and SHP-1 negative feedback pathways , 2003, Nature Immunology.

[26]  R. Germain,et al.  Single Cell Analysis Reveals Regulated Hierarchical T Cell Antigen Receptor Signaling Thresholds and Intraclonal Heterogeneity for Individual Cytokine Responses of CD4+ T Cells , 1997, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[27]  V. Moy,et al.  Direct evidence for two affinity states for lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1 on activated T cells. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[28]  D. Wiest,et al.  On the dynamics of TCR:CD3 complex cell surface expression and downmodulation. , 2000, Immunity.

[29]  G. Griffiths,et al.  The secretory synapse: the secrets of a serial killer , 2002, Immunological reviews.

[30]  Michael Loran Dustin Stop and go traffic to tune T cell responses. , 2004, Immunity.

[31]  E. Palmer,et al.  The T-cell receptor signalosome: a dynamic structure with expanding complexity. , 2002, Current opinion in immunology.

[32]  A. Noest,et al.  Designing lymphocyte functional structure for optimal signal detection: voilà, T cells. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[33]  A. Lanzavecchia,et al.  Different responses are elicited in cytotoxic T lymphocytes by different levels of T cell receptor occupancy , 1996, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[34]  Cliburn Chan,et al.  T cell sensitivity and specificity - kinetic proofreading revisited , 2003 .

[35]  Morgan Huse,et al.  Agonist/endogenous peptide–MHC heterodimers drive T cell activation and sensitivity , 2005, Nature.

[36]  P. Marrack,et al.  An inverse relationship between T cell receptor affinity and antigen dose during CD4(+) T cell responses in vivo and in vitro. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Arup K Chakraborty,et al.  CD4 enhances T cell sensitivity to antigen by coordinating Lck accumulation at the immunological synapse , 2004, Nature Immunology.

[38]  F. Koning,et al.  CD4‐independent T cells impair TCR triggering of CD4‐dependent T cells: a putative mechanism for T cell affinity maturation , 2001, European journal of immunology.

[39]  A. Weiss,et al.  Ligand-receptor interactions required for commitment to the activation of the interleukin 2 gene. , 1987, Journal of immunology.

[40]  B. Goldstein,et al.  Calculations show substantial serial engagement of T cell receptors. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[41]  C. Nelson,et al.  Structural and Functional Consequences of Altering a Peptide MHC Anchor Residue1 , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[42]  L. Turka,et al.  The Proliferative Capacity of Individual Naive CD4+T Cells Is Amplified by Prolonged T Cell Antigen Receptor Triggering , 2002, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[43]  S. Dzik,et al.  The immunological synapse: A molecular machine controlling T cell activation , 2000 .

[44]  Mark M Davis,et al.  Continuous T cell receptor signaling required for synapse maintenance and full effector potential , 2003, Nature Immunology.

[45]  H. Grey,et al.  Study of the Mechanism of TCR Antagonism Using Dual-TCR-Expressing T Cells1 , 2003, The Journal of Immunology.

[46]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Direct observation of ligand recognition by T cells , 2002, Nature.

[47]  E. Palmer,et al.  The TCR signalosome : a dynamic structure with expanding complexity , 2022 .

[48]  Philippa Marrack,et al.  T Cells Compete for Access to Antigen-Bearing Antigen-Presenting Cells , 2000, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[49]  Mark M Davis,et al.  T cell killing does not require the formation of a stable mature immunological synapse , 2004, Nature Immunology.

[50]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  The IkappaB-NF-kappaB signaling module: temporal control and selective gene activation. , 2002, Science.

[51]  Michael Loran Dustin,et al.  Cytoskeletal polarization and redistribution of cell-surface molecules during T cell antigen recognition. , 2000, Seminars in immunology.

[52]  Boris Barbour,et al.  Functional antigen-independent synapses formed between T cells and dendritic cells , 2001, Nature Immunology.

[53]  A. Lanzavecchia,et al.  The duration of antigenic stimulation determines the fate of naive and effector T cells. , 1998, Immunity.

[54]  B. Nal,et al.  Activation-induced polarized recycling targets T cell antigen receptors to the immunological synapse; involvement of SNARE complexes. , 2004, Immunity.

[55]  R. Lewis,et al.  Calcium oscillations in T-cells: mechanisms and consequences for gene expression. , 2003, Biochemical Society transactions.

[56]  Cliburn Chan,et al.  Feedback control of T–cell receptor activation , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[57]  T. McKeithan,et al.  Kinetic proofreading in T-cell receptor signal transduction. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[58]  D A Rand,et al.  A reliable and safe T cell repertoire based on low-affinity T cell receptors. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[59]  Michael Loran Dustin,et al.  Membranes as messengers in T cell adhesion signaling , 2004, Nature Immunology.

[60]  Antonio Lanzavecchia,et al.  T cell fitness determined by signal strength , 2003, Nature Immunology.

[61]  R. Zaru,et al.  Cutting Edge: T Lymphocyte Activation by Repeated Immunological Synapse Formation and Intermittent Signaling 1 , 2003, The Journal of Immunology.

[62]  A. Lanzavecchia,et al.  Serial triggering of many T-cell receptors by a few peptide–MHC complexes , 1995, Nature.