Habitat selection by a large herbivore at multiple spatial and temporal scales is primarily governed by food resources

Habitat selection can be considered as a hierarchical process in which animals satisfy their habitat requirements at different ecological scales. Theory predicts that spatial and temporal scales should co-vary in most ecological processes and that the most limiting factors should drive habitat selection at coarse ecological scales, but be less influential at finer scales. Using detailed location data on roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) inhabiting the Bavarian Forest National Park, Germany, we investigated habitat selection at several spatial and temporal scales. We tested (i) whether time-varying patterns were governed by factors reported as having the largest effects on fitness, (ii) whether the trade-off between forage and predation risks differed among spatial and temporal scales and (iii) if spatial and temporal scales are positively associated. We analysed the variation in habitat selection within the landscape and within home ranges at monthly intervals, with respect to land-cover type and proxys of food and cover over seasonal and diurnal temporal scales. The fine-scale temporal variation follows a nycthemeral cycle linked to diurnal variation in human disturbance. The large-scale variation matches seasonal plant phenology, suggesting food resources being a greater limiting factor than lynx predation risk. The trade-off between selection for food and cover was similar on seasonal and diurnal scale. Habitat selection at the different scales may be the consequence of the temporal variation and predictability of the limiting factors as much as its association with fitness. The landscape of fear might have less importance at the studied scale of habitat selection than generally accepted because of the predator hunting strategy. Finally, seasonal variation in habitat selection was similar at the large and small spatial scales, which may arise because of the marked philopatry of roe deer. The difference is supposed to be greater for wider ranging herbivores. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

[1]  M. Heurich,et al.  European Roe Deer Increase Vigilance When Faced with Immediate Predation Risk by Eurasian Lynx , 2017 .

[2]  P. Beier,et al.  Influence of separating home range and dispersal movements on characterizing corridors and effective distances , 2016, Landscape Ecology.

[3]  K. McGarigal,et al.  Multi-scale habitat selection modeling: a review and outlook , 2016, Landscape Ecology.

[4]  R. Bivand,et al.  Tools for Reading and Handling Spatial Objects , 2016 .

[5]  A. Mysterud,et al.  How many routes lead to migration? Comparison of methods to assess and characterize migratory movements. , 2016, The Journal of animal ecology.

[6]  Mathieu Basille,et al.  Plastic response of fearful prey to the spatiotemporal dynamics of predator distribution. , 2015, Ecology.

[7]  Marco Heurich,et al.  Forest inventories by LiDAR data: A comparison of single tree segmentation and metric-based methods for inventories of a heterogeneous temperate forest , 2015, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[8]  C. DePerno,et al.  Poor soils and density-mediated body weight in deer: forage quality or quantity? , 2015 .

[9]  Garrett M. Street,et al.  Space-use behaviour of woodland caribou based on a cognitive movement model. , 2015, The Journal of animal ecology.

[10]  T. Hothorn,et al.  Creating a landscape of management: Unintended effects on the variation of browsing pressure in a national park , 2015 .

[11]  K. Kotrschal.  John Dittami (1949–2014) , 2015 .

[12]  Mark S. Boyce,et al.  GPS Based Daily Activity Patterns in European Red Deer and North American Elk (Cervus elaphus): Indication for a Weak Circadian Clock in Ungulates , 2014, PloS one.

[13]  T. Hothorn,et al.  Protected areas shape the spatial distribution of a European lynx population more than 20 years after reintroduction , 2014 .

[14]  Marco Heurich,et al.  LiDAR Remote Sensing of Forest Structure and GPS Telemetry Data Provide Insights on Winter Habitat Selection of European Roe Deer , 2014 .

[15]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Living and dying in a multi‐predator landscape of fear: roe deer are squeezed by contrasting pattern of predation risk imposed by lynx and humans , 2014 .

[16]  L. Cordes,et al.  Behavioral Responses Associated with a Human-Mediated Predator Shelter , 2014, PloS one.

[17]  Peter Leimgruber,et al.  From Fine-Scale Foraging to Home Ranges: A Semivariance Approach to Identifying Movement Modes across Spatiotemporal Scales , 2014, The American Naturalist.

[18]  Mark S Boyce,et al.  Applications of step-selection functions in ecology and conservation , 2014, Movement Ecology.

[19]  J. Ewald.  Estimating the distribution of forage mass for ungulates from vegetation plots in Bavarian Forest National Park , 2014 .

[20]  O. Liberg,et al.  Habitat Selection and Risk of Predation: Re-colonization by Lynx had Limited Impact on Habitat Selection by Roe Deer , 2013, PloS one.

[21]  Marco Heurich,et al.  Spatio-temporal infestation patterns of Ips typographus (L.) in the Bavarian Forest National Park, Germany , 2013 .

[22]  J. Kreisinger,et al.  Foraging sites of Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx: relative importance of microhabitat and prey occurrence , 2013 .

[23]  Floris M. van Beest,et al.  Behavioural Responses to Thermal Conditions Affect Seasonal Mass Change in a Heat-Sensitive Northern Ungulate , 2013, PloS one.

[24]  Georg Emanuel Cajetan Weilnböck.  Zur Stressbelastung des Rehwilds (Capreolus capreolus) beim Fang mit der Kastenfalle , 2013 .

[25]  N. Morellet,et al.  Habitat use under predation risk: hunting, roads and human dwellings influence the spatial behaviour of roe deer , 2012, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[26]  Joseph M. Northrup,et al.  Effects of Humans on Behaviour of Wildlife Exceed Those of Natural Predators in a Landscape of Fear , 2012, PLoS ONE.

[27]  Göran Ericsson,et al.  From migration to nomadism: movement variability in a northern ungulate across its latitudinal range. , 2012, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[28]  Linking trade-offs in habitat selection with the occurrence of functional responses for moose living in two nearby study areas , 2012, Oecologia.

[29]  M. Heurich,et al.  First estimation of Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) abundance and density using digital cameras and capture-recapture techniques in a German national park , 2012 .

[30]  T. Hothorn,et al.  Survival and causes of death of European Roe Deer before and after Eurasian Lynx reintroduction in the Bavarian Forest National Park , 2012, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[31]  S. Lowe,et al.  Seasonal shifts in habitat selection of a large herbivore and the influence of human activity , 2011 .

[32]  Markus Neteler,et al.  Partial migration in roe deer: migratory and resident tactics are end points of a behavioural gradient determined by ecological factors , 2011 .

[33]  Bram Van Moorter,et al.  Moose Alces alces habitat use at multiple temporal scales in a human-altered landscape , 2011 .

[34]  Alan Agresti,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis , 2003 .

[35]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Habitat use by female western roe deer (Capreolus capreolus): influence of resource availability on habitat selection in two contrasting years. , 2010 .

[36]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Habitat–performance relationships: finding the right metric at a given spatial scale , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  Jason Matthiopoulos,et al.  The interpretation of habitat preference metrics under use–availability designs , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  J. M. Fryxell,et al.  Foraging theory upscaled: the behavioural ecology of herbivore movement , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  Francesca Cagnacci,et al.  Resolving issues of imprecise and habitat-biased locations in ecological analyses using GPS telemetry data , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  Floris M. van Beest,et al.  Forage quantity, quality and depletion as scale-dependent mechanisms driving habitat selection of a large browsing herbivore. , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.

[41]  Daniel Fortin,et al.  Mixed conditional logistic regression for habitat selection studies. , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.

[42]  John D. C. Linnell,et al.  Trade-offs between maternal foraging and fawn predation risk in an income breeder , 2010, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[43]  W. Schmidt,et al.  The estimation of aboveground biomass and nutrient pools of understorey plants in closed Norway spruce forests and on clearcuts , 2010, European Journal of Forest Research.

[44]  W. Ripple,et al.  The Landscape of Fear: Ecological Implications of Being Afraid~!2009-09-09~!2009-11-16~!2010-02-02~! , 2010 .

[45]  Olof Liberg,et al.  Wolf predation on moose and roe deer: chase distances and outcome of encounters , 2009, Acta Theriologica.

[46]  R. Kowalczyk,et al.  Microhabitat selection by Eurasian lynx and its implications for species conservation , 2008, Acta Theriologica.

[47]  F. Cagnacci,et al.  Do male roe deer clump together during the rut? , 2005, Acta Theriologica.

[48]  Erlend B. Nilsen,et al.  Selection of bed-sites by roe deerCapreolus capreolus fawns in an agricultural landscape , 2004, Acta Theriologica.

[49]  M. Heurich,et al.  Distribution and status of lynx in the border region between Czech Republic, Germany and Austria , 2001, Acta Theriologica.

[50]  M. Heurich,et al.  National Parks as Model Regions for Interdisciplinary Long-Term Ecological Research: The Bavarian Forest and Šumavá National Parks Underway to Transboundary Ecosystem Research , 2010 .

[51]  Daniel Fortin,et al.  Considering ecological dynamics in resource selection functions. , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.

[52]  M. Heurich,et al.  Annual changes in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.) diet in the Bohemian Forest, Czech Republic/Germany , 2010, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[53]  M. Hebblewhite,et al.  Trade-offs between predation risk and forage differ between migrant strategies in a migratory ungulate. , 2009, Ecology.

[54]  Paul J Rathouz,et al.  Accounting for animal movement in estimation of resource selection functions: sampling and data analysis. , 2009, Ecology.

[55]  Nicolas Morellet,et al.  The Effect of Capture on Ranging Behaviour and Activity of the European Roe Deer Capreolus capreolus , 2009 .

[56]  B. Sæther,et al.  Scale dependency and functional response in moose habitat selection , 2009 .

[57]  S. Creel,et al.  Wolf presence and increased willow consumption by Yellowstone elk: implications for trophic cascades. , 2009, Ecology.

[58]  J. Gaillard,et al.  What shapes Eurasian lynx distribution in human dominated landscapes: selecting prey or avoiding people? , 2009 .

[59]  J. A. Schaefer,et al.  Habitat Selection at Multiple Scales , 2009 .

[60]  Atle Mysterud,et al.  Temporal scales, trade-offs, and functional responses in red deer habitat selection. , 2009, Ecology.

[61]  M. Kreuzer,et al.  Habitat selection by an Alpine ungulate: the significance of forage characteristics varies with scale and season , 2009 .

[62]  D. Macdonald,et al.  Behavioral adjustments of African herbivores to predation risk by lions: spatiotemporal variations influence habitat use. , 2009, Ecology.

[63]  S. Ciuti,et al.  Anti-predator behaviour, space use and habitat selection in female roe deer during the fawning season in a wolf area , 2008 .

[64]  S. Aulagnier,et al.  Hunting increases vigilance levels in roe deer and modifies feeding site selection , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[65]  Aurélie Coulon,et al.  Inferring the effects of landscape structure on roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) movements using a step selection function , 2008, Landscape Ecology.

[66]  Cameron L. Aldridge,et al.  ACCOUNTING FOR FITNESS: COMBINING SURVIVAL AND SELECTION WHEN ASSESSING WILDLIFE-HABITAT RELATIONSHIPS , 2008 .

[67]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Lifetime reproductive success and composition of the home range in a large herbivore. , 2007, Ecology.

[68]  E. Gese,et al.  Comparative Patterns of Predation by Cougars and Recolonizing Wolves in Montana's Madison Range , 2007 .

[69]  Dean P. Anderson,et al.  State-space models link elk movement patterns to landscape characteristics in Yellowstone National Park , 2007 .

[70]  B. Jędrzejewska,et al.  ACTIVITY PATTERNS OF RED DEER IN BIAŁOWIEŻA NATIONAL PARK, POLAND , 2007 .

[71]  Clément Calenge,et al.  The package “adehabitat” for the R software: A tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals , 2006 .

[72]  Cameron L. Aldridge,et al.  Application of random effects to the study of resource selection by animals. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[73]  Mark S. Boyce,et al.  Scale for resource selection functions , 2006 .

[74]  S. Wood.  Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R , 2006 .

[75]  EVELYN H. MERRILL,et al.  HABITAT SELECTION BY ELK BEFORE AND AFTER WOLF REINTRODUCTION IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK , 2005 .

[76]  R. Courtois,et al.  Linking moose habitat selection to limiting factors , 2005 .

[77]  Mark Hebblewhite,et al.  Spatial decomposition of predation risk using resource selection functions: an example in a wolf /elk predator /prey system , 2005 .

[78]  H. Fritz,et al.  Assessment of forage availability in ecological studies , 2005, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[79]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[80]  M. Boyce,et al.  WOLVES INFLUENCE ELK MOVEMENTS: BEHAVIOR SHAPES A TROPHIC CASCADE IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK , 2005 .

[81]  S. Creel,et al.  Responses of elk herd size to fine-scale spatial and temporal variation in the risk of predation by wolves , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[82]  H. Herbold.  Anthropogener Einfluß auf die Raumnutzung von Rehwild(Capreolus capreolus) , 1995, Zeitschrift für Jagdwissenschaft.

[83]  M. Schütz,et al.  Waldentwicklung im Nationalpark , 2005 .

[84]  Burt P. Kotler,et al.  Hazardous duty pay and the foraging cost of predation , 2004 .

[85]  Yu. V. Belyaev,et al.  Classification of Forest Areas by Spectrozonal Images Obtained from Onboard a Helicopter , 2004 .

[86]  John E. Gross,et al.  Movement rules for herbivores in spatially heterogeneous environments: responses to small scale pattern , 1995, Landscape Ecology.

[87]  R. Hofmann.  Evolutionary steps of ecophysiological adaptation and diversification of ruminants: a comparative view of their digestive system , 1989, Oecologia.

[88]  B. Doligez,et al.  When to use public information for breeding habitat selection? The role of environmental predictability and density dependence , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[89]  S. Wood.  Thin plate regression splines , 2003 .

[90]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Scale and heterogeneity in habitat selection by elk in Yellowstone National Park , 2003 .

[91]  John M. Fryxell,et al.  THE TEMPORAL SCALE OF FORAGING DECISIONS IN BISON , 2002 .

[92]  Chris J. Johnson,et al.  Movement parameters of ungulates and scale‐specific responses to the environment , 2002 .

[93]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology , 2000 .

[94]  F. Messier,et al.  Hierarchical habitat selection by woodland caribou: its relationship to limiting factors , 2000 .

[95]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Factors affecting maternal care in an income breeder, the European roe deer , 2000 .

[96]  A. Mysterud,et al.  Scale-dependent trade-offs in foraging by European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) during winter , 1999 .

[97]  Atle Mysterud,et al.  Habitat selection by roe deer and sheep: does habitat ranking reflect resource availability? , 1999 .

[98]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Vigilance, patch use and habitat selection: Foraging under predation risk , 1999 .

[99]  L. Shipley,et al.  Diet choices made by free-ranging moose in northern Sweden in relation to plant distribution, chemistry, and morphology , 1998 .

[100]  Atle Mysterud,et al.  FUNCTIONAL RESPONSES IN HABITAT USE: AVAILABILITY INFLUENCES RELATIVE USE IN TRADE-OFF SITUATIONS , 1998 .

[101]  K. I. Jönsson,et al.  Capital and income breeding as alternative tactics of resource use in reproduction , 1997 .

[102]  John D. C. Linnell,et al.  Habitat use and ecological correlates of home range size in a small cervid : the roe deer , 1996 .

[103]  M. Main,et al.  Sexual segregation in Rocky Mountain mule deer , 1996 .

[104]  A. Johansson,et al.  Territorial dynamics and marking behaviour in male roe deer , 1996 .

[105]  P. Duncan,et al.  Are European roe deer browsers ? A review of variations in the composition of their diets , 1996, Revue d'Écologie (La Terre et La Vie).

[106]  Colin W. Clark,et al.  Antipredator behavior and the asset-protection principle , 1994 .

[107]  B. Manly,et al.  Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. , 1994 .

[108]  A. Houston,et al.  General results concerning the trade-off between gaining energy and avoiding predation , 1993 .

[109]  James F. Wittenberger,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Scales in Habitat Selection , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[110]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus , 1990 .

[111]  J. Wiens.  Spatial Scaling in Ecology , 1989 .

[112]  Douglas H. Johnson.  THE COMPARISON OF USAGE AND AVAILABILITY MEASUREMENTS FOR EVALUATING RESOURCE PREFERENCE , 1980 .