The nature of knowledge and the platform and matrix solutions in the design of knowledge management systems

The structure of knowledge systems is a crucial component of the effort to make these systems effective and acceptable to users. This paper argues that the structure must correspond with the nature of knowledge, as the externalization of cognitive phenomena, in the form of intellectual nuggets that include topics, stories, concepts, and images. Lessons from the structuring of organizations suggest that the platform and the matrix approaches could be adopted in the design of knowledge systems. The paper then describes the advantages and limitations of these solutions.

[1]  Eliezer Geisler,et al.  A taxonomy and proposed codification of knowledge and knowledge systems in organizations , 2006 .

[2]  H. Simon,et al.  Rational choice and the structure of the environment. , 1956, Psychological review.

[3]  Yi-Shun Wang,et al.  Examining the dimensionality and measurement of user-perceived knowledge and information quality in the KMS context , 2009, J. Inf. Sci..

[4]  Albert Harold Rubenstein,et al.  Managing Technology in the Decentralized Firm , 2001 .

[5]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Special Issue: Knowledge, Knowing, and Organizations: Knowledge as a Contingency Variable: Do the Characteristics of Knowledge Predict Organization Structure? , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[6]  A. Grandori Corporate governance and firm organization : microfoundations and structural forms , 2004 .

[7]  Dhaval Dalal,et al.  Managing platform architectures and manufacturing processes for nonassembled products , 2002 .

[8]  Anna Grandori,et al.  Governance Structures, Coordination Mechanisms and Cognitive Models , 1997 .

[9]  Jeanne G. Harris,et al.  Competing on Analytics: The New Science of Winning , 2007 .

[10]  Eliezer Geisler,et al.  A typology of knowledge management: strategic groups and role behavior in organizations , 2007, J. Knowl. Manag..

[11]  Carlos Scheel Knowledge clusters of technological innovation systems , 2002, J. Knowl. Manag..

[12]  Giuseppe Turchetti,et al.  Health technology assessment in the context of private and public models of national health systems , 2009, PICMET '09 - 2009 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology.

[13]  Giuseppe Turchetti,et al.  Economic and Organizational Factors in the Future of Telemedicine and Home Care , 2010 .

[14]  E. Geisler,et al.  Home healthcare services: a case service-dominant-logic in the marketing of technology-based services , 2009 .

[15]  L R Burns,et al.  Matrix management in hospitals: testing theories of matrix structure and development. , 1989, Administrative science quarterly.

[16]  Gregory K. Dow Configurational and Coactivational Views of Organizational Structure , 1988 .

[17]  J. Spender Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm , 1996 .

[18]  Cécile Clergeau,et al.  ICTs and knowledge codification: lessons from front office call centers , 2005 .

[19]  W. Joyce Matrix Organization: A Social Experiment , 1986 .

[20]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[21]  Eliezer Geisler,et al.  Explaining the Generation and Performance of Intersector Technology Cooperation: A Survey of the Literature , 2001, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[22]  Jay R. Galbraith,et al.  Organizing to implement strategies of diversity and globalization: The role of matrix designs , 1986 .

[23]  Edward Lorenz,et al.  Models of Cognition, the Contextualisation of Knowledge and Organisational Theory , 2001 .

[24]  Eliezer Geisler Managing the Aftermath of Radical Corporate Change: Reengineering, Restructuring, and Reinvention , 1997 .

[25]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[26]  Michael T. Hannan,et al.  Special Issue: Frontiers of Organization Science, Part 2 of 2: Identities, Genres, and Organizational Forms , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[27]  M. Polanyi Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[28]  Nicolai J. Foss,et al.  Selective Intervention and Internal Hybrids : Interpreting and Learning from the Rise and Decline of the Oticon Spaghetti Organization , 2001 .

[29]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Concept of “Ba”: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation , 1998 .

[30]  Mie Augier,et al.  The architecture and design of the knowledge organization , 2004, J. Knowl. Manag..

[31]  Elie Geisler,et al.  Tacit and explicit knowledge: empirical investigation in an emergency regime , 2009, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[32]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  The Power of Product Platforms , 1997 .

[33]  Eliezer Geisler,et al.  Installing and Managing Workable Knowledge Management Systems , 2003 .

[34]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Co-reference and reasoning , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[35]  Ronald N. Kostoff,et al.  Strategic Management and Implementation of Textual Data Mining in Government Organizations , 1999 .

[36]  Lynn E. Miller,et al.  The Concept of Ideology in Organizational Analysis: The Sociology of Knowledge or the Social Psychology of Beliefs? , 1987 .

[37]  Sarita Albagli,et al.  Memory Practices in the Sciences , 2008 .

[38]  John C. Thomas,et al.  The knowledge management puzzle: Human and social factors in knowledge management , 2001, IBM Syst. J..

[39]  Joan C. Woodward Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice , 1966 .

[40]  Eliezer Geisler,et al.  Harnessing the value of experience in the knowledge-driven firm , 1999 .