Tracing the foundations of a conceptual framework for a patient safety ontology

Background In work for the World Alliance for Patient Safety on research methods and measures and on defining key concepts for an International Patient Safety Classification (ICPS), it became apparent that there was a need to try to understand how the meaning of patient safety and underlying concepts relate to the existing safety and quality frameworks commonly used in healthcare. Objectives To unfold the concept of patient safety and how it relates to safety and quality frameworks commonly used in healthcare and to trace the evolution of the ICPS framework as a basis of the electronic capture of the component elements of patient safety. Conclusion The ICPS conceptual framework for patient safety has its origins in existing frameworks and an international consultation process. Although its 10 classes and their semantic relationships may be used as a reference model for different disciplines, it must remain dynamic in the ever-changing world of healthcare. By expanding the ICPS by examining data from all available sources, and ensuring rigorous compliance with the latest principles of informatics, a deeper interdisciplinary approach will progressively be developed to address the complex, refractory problem of reducing healthcare-associated harm.

[1]  Pierre Lewalle,et al.  Towards an International Classification for Patient Safety: the conceptual framework , 2009, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[2]  R. Thomson,et al.  Towards an International Classification for Patient Safety: key concepts and terms , 2009, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[3]  S. L. Donaldson,et al.  An international language for patient safety , 2009, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[4]  Pierre Lewalle,et al.  Towards an International Classification for Patient Safety: a Delphi survey , 2009, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[5]  W B Runciman,et al.  Towards safer, better healthcare: harnessing the natural properties of complex sociotechnical systems , 2009, Quality & Safety in Health Care.

[6]  R. Flin,et al.  The epistemology of patient safety research. , 2008, International journal of evidence-based healthcare.

[7]  R J Lilford,et al.  An epistemology of patient safety research: a framework for study design and interpretation. Part 1. Conceptualising and developing interventions , 2008, Quality & Safety in Health Care.

[8]  R J Lilford,et al.  An epistemology of patient safety research: a framework for study design and interpretation. Part 2. Study design , 2008, Quality & Safety in Health Care.

[9]  John Xavier Rolley Bn Rn Mcn Mrcna Safety and Ethics in Healthcare: A Guide to Getting it Right , 2007 .

[10]  W. Runciman,et al.  An integrated framework for safety, quality and risk management: an information and incident management system based on a universal patient safety classification , 2006, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[11]  R Flin,et al.  Measuring safety climate in health care , 2006, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[12]  J. Loeb,et al.  The JCAHO patient safety event taxonomy: a standardized terminology and classification schema for near misses and adverse events. , 2005, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[13]  T. Stephenson The National Patient Safety Agency , 2005, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[14]  Steven H. Woolf,et al.  A String of Mistakes: The Importance of Cascade Analysis in Describing, Counting, and Preventing Medical Errors , 2004, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[15]  W B Runciman,et al.  Setting priorities for patient safety , 2002, Quality & safety in health care.

[16]  J. Callum,et al.  The Medical Event Reporting System for Transfusion Medicine , 2002, Vox sanguinis.

[17]  J. Callum,et al.  The Medical Event Reporting System for Transfusion Medicine: will it help get the right blood to the right patient? , 2002, Transfusion medicine reviews.

[18]  A. Wall,et al.  Book ReviewTo Err is Human: building a safer health system Kohn L T Corrigan J M Donaldson M S Washington DC USA: Institute of Medicine/National Academy Press ISBN 0 309 06837 1 $34.95 , 2000 .

[19]  D. Hewett,et al.  How to investigate and analyse clinical incidents: Clinical Risk Unit and Association of Litigation and Risk Management protocol , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  James T. Reason,et al.  Managing the risks of organizational accidents , 1997 .

[21]  Marilyn Sue Bogner,et al.  Human Error in Medicine , 1995 .

[22]  John W. Senders,et al.  Human Error: Cause, Prediction, and Reduction , 1991 .

[23]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Psychology of everyday things , 1990 .

[24]  Jill Turner,et al.  WORLD HEALTH ASSEMBLY , 1989, The Lancet.

[25]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Information Processing and Human-Machine Interaction: An Approach to Cognitive Engineering , 1986 .

[26]  Mark Bostridge Florence Nightingale : the woman and her legend , 2008 .

[27]  I. Edwards The WHO World Alliance for Patient Safety , 2005, Drug safety.

[28]  C. V. Van Way Patient safety. , 2005, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition.

[29]  T. Caeiro,et al.  [Error in medicine]. , 2004, Medicina.

[30]  J. Moller,et al.  Iatrogenic injury in Australia , 2001 .

[31]  William R. Hendee,et al.  To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System , 2001 .

[32]  J. Reason Human error: models and management. , 2000, BMJ.

[33]  J. Rassmusen,et al.  Information Processing and Human - Machine Interaction: An Approach to Cognitive Engineering , 1986 .

[34]  Charles Perrow Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies , 1984 .

[35]  A. Donabedian The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment , 1980 .