The ''Identified Victim'' Effect: An Identified Group, or Just a Single Individual?

People’s greater willingness to help identified victims, relative to non-identified ones, was examined by varying the singularity of the victim (single vs. a group of eight individuals), and the availability of individually identifying information (the main difference being the inclusion of a picture in the ‘‘identified’’ versions). Results support the proposal that the ‘‘identified victim’’ effect is largely restricted to situations with a single victim: the identified single victim elicited considerably more contributions than the non-identified single victim, while the identification of the individual group members had essentially no effect on willingness to contribute. Participants also report experiencing distress when the victim is single and identified more than in any other condition. Hence, the emotional reaction to the victims appears to be a major source of the effect. Copyright # 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment , 2002 .

[2]  C. Batson,et al.  Perspective Taking: Imagining How Another Feels Versus Imaging How You Would Feel , 1997 .

[3]  I. Ritov,et al.  Emotion-based choice , 1999 .

[4]  Jonathan Baron,et al.  Behavioral Law and Economics: Reluctance to Vaccinate: Omission Bias and Ambiguity , 1990 .

[5]  Ilana Ritov,et al.  The singularity effect of identified victims in separate and joint evaluations , 2005 .

[6]  D. Hamilton,et al.  Perceiving individuals and groups: expectancies, dispositional inferences, and causal attributions. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  Kevin L. Harrell,et al.  Empathic joy and the empathy-altruism hypothesis. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  Mark H. Davis.  Empathy: A Social Psychological Approach , 1994 .

[9]  A. L. Beaman,et al.  Empathy-based helping: is it selflessly or selfishly motivated? , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  C. Daniel Batson,et al.  Prosocial Motivation: Is it ever Truly Altruistic? , 1987 .

[11]  R. S. Rosomoff,et al.  The life you save may be your own. , 1996, The Clinical journal of pain.

[12]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  A Fundamental Prediction Error: Self-Others Discrepancies in Risk Preference , 1997 .

[13]  D. Hamilton,et al.  Perceiving persons and groups. , 1996, Psychological review.

[14]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Framing, probability distortions, and insurance decisions , 1993 .

[15]  Diederik A. Stapel,et al.  Just as if it happened to me : The impact of vivid and self-relevant information on risk judgments , 1996 .

[16]  S. Epstein.  Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. , 1994, The American psychologist.

[17]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Explaining the Identifiable Victim Effect , 1997 .

[18]  C. Daniel Batson,et al.  Two Threats to the Common Good: Self-Interested Egoism and Empathy-Induced Altruism , 1999 .

[19]  George Loewenstein,et al.  Helping a Victim or Helping the Victim: Altruism and Identifiability , 2003 .

[20]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Risk as Feelings , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[21]  E. Weber.  Who's Afraid of Poor Old-Age? Risk Perception of Risk Management Decisions , 1999 .

[22]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Money, Kisses, and Electric Shocks: On the Affective Psychology of Risk , 2001, Psychological science.

[23]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Dual-process theories in social psychology , 1999 .

[24]  L. L. Shaw,et al.  Immorality from empathy-induced altruism: when compassion and justice conflict , 1995 .

[25]  D A Redelmeier,et al.  Discrepancy between medical decisions for individual patients and for groups. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  E. Weber.  The Role of Risk Perception in Risk Management Decisions: Who’s Afraid of a Poor Old-Age? , 2003 .

[27]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The affect heuristic , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  Jeffrey W. Sherman,et al.  Perceiving individuals and groups: Expectancies, dispositional inferences, and causal attributions - eScholarship , 1999 .