Efficient Training Of Visual Search Via Attentional Highlighting

Human activities often involve interaction with dynamic or complex visual environments, e.g., driving an automobile or inspecting radiographic images. Knowing where to look and what features to look for in a given context is critical to expertise, but this knowledge is typically acquired by effortful and inefficient trial-and-error learning. We ask whether training of endogenous attentional control can be improved by highlighting regions of interest in a display. Participants searched displays whose global configurations predicted the location of a target. Training reduced response latencies—indicating learning of contingencies—whether during training participants effortfully searched for targets or were directed to target locations via highlighting (brief flashes). However, highlighting was effective only when the training task required no response beyond a saccade to the target. By halving training time and demanding less effort, highlighting shows practical potential and also provides insight into the interplay between exogenous and endogenous attentional control.

[1]  Allen and Rosenbloom Paul S. Newell,et al.  Mechanisms of Skill Acquisition and the Law of Practice , 1993 .

[2]  J. Swets,et al.  Enhanced interpretation of diagnostic images. , 1988, Investigative radiology.

[3]  R. Schmidt,et al.  New Conceptualizations of Practice: Common Principles in Three Paradigms Suggest New Concepts for Training , 1992 .

[4]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  The Cognitive Basis for the Design of a Mammography Interpretation Tutor 1 , 1998 .

[5]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  R. D. Wright,et al.  The Effect of Practice on Location Cueing and Visual Search , 1999 .

[7]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  Eye Movements and Problem Solving , 2003, Psychological science.

[8]  Peter Phillips,et al.  The effect of feedback on performance in a fracture detection task , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[9]  Melina A. Kunar,et al.  Contextual cueing by global features , 2005 .

[10]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up influences on learning from animations , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[11]  David F. Feldon,et al.  The Implications of Research on Expertise for Curriculum and Pedagogy , 2007 .

[12]  A. Rangel,et al.  Biasing simple choices by manipulating relative visual attention , 2008, Judgment and Decision Making.

[13]  Richard Dewhurst,et al.  Training Eye Movements: Can Training People Where to Look Hinder the Processing of Fixated Objects? , 2008, Perception.

[14]  Marcelo de Almeida Maia,et al.  INDIAM—An e-Learning System for the Interpretation of Mammograms , 2009, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[15]  Alejandro Lleras,et al.  Covert shifts of attention function as an implicit aid to insight , 2009, Cognition.

[16]  Bradley C. Love,et al.  Seeing the World through an Expert's Eyes: Context-Aware Display as a Training Companion , 2009, HCI.

[17]  F. Paas,et al.  Attention guidance in learning from a complex animation: Seeing is understanding? , 2010 .

[18]  T. Crawford,et al.  Viewing another person's eye movements improves identification of pulmonary nodules in chest x-ray inspection. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[19]  Matthew H. Wilder,et al.  An integrative, experience-based theory of attentional control. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[20]  Javier R. Movellan,et al.  Discriminately decreasing discriminability with learned image filters , 2011, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[21]  M. Mozer,et al.  When does fading enhance perceptual category learning? , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.