Peripheral and central aspects of auditory across-frequency processing

Many natural sounds such as, e.g., speech show common level fluctuations across frequency. It is generally assumed that the auditory system uses this spectro-temporal information to group the frequency components into auditory objects although the exact physiological mechanism is still not fully understood. The aim of the present study is to disentangle the relative contribution of peripheral and central aspects of this across-frequency processing using psychophysical experiments and modelling. The study focuses on two different psychophysical phenomena which are thought to be related to the ability to compare information across frequency: comodulation masking release (CMR), i.e., a release from masking of a sinusoidal signal due to the addition of a comodulated off-frequency masker component to the masker component at the signal frequency, and comodulation detection difference (CDD), i.e., the reduced ability of the auditory system to detect a masked signal if masker and signal share the same envelope. The comparison between model predictions and experimental results indicates that a considerable amount of these effects can be accounted for by peripheral processing alone. This is confirmed by experimental results with confounding across-frequency information about the grouping of the different frequencies into auditory objects.

[1]  Israel Nelken,et al.  Responses of auditory-cortex neurons to structural features of natural sounds , 1999, Nature.

[2]  M F Cohen Comodulation masking release over a three octave range. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Comodulation detection differences for fixed-frequency and roved-frequency maskers. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  I. Winter,et al.  Frequency extent of two-tone facilitation in onset units in the ventral cochlear nucleus. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Stephan M A Ernst,et al.  Role of suppression and retro-cochlear processes in comodulation masking release. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Birger Kollmeier,et al.  Hearing - from sensory processing to perception , 2007 .

[7]  S Buus,et al.  Release from masking caused by envelope fluctuations. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  N. C. Singh,et al.  Modulation spectra of natural sounds and ethological theories of auditory processing. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Christopher J. Plack,et al.  Linear and nonlinear processes in temporal masking , 2002 .

[10]  B. Moore,et al.  Tests of a within-channel account of comodulation detection differences. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  E. Lopez-Poveda,et al.  A computational algorithm for computing nonlinear auditory frequency selectivity. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  S Buus,et al.  Temporal integration of loudness as a function of level. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  T Dau,et al.  On the role of envelope fluctuation processing in spectral masking. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  C. Plack,et al.  The effects of low- and high-frequency suppressors on psychophysical estimates of basilar-membrane compression and gain. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  M. F. Cohen,et al.  The effect of cross-spectrum correlation on the detectability of a noise band. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  D. McFadden,et al.  Comodulation detection differences using noise-band signals. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  A. Oxenham,et al.  Suppression and the upward spread of masking. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  L. Robles,et al.  Two-tone suppression in the basilar membrane of the cochlea: mechanical basis of auditory-nerve rate suppression. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  G. Klump,et al.  Signal detection in amplitude‐modulated maskers. I. Behavioural auditory thresholds in a songbird , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[20]  Daniel Pressnitzer,et al.  The psychophysics and physiology of comodulation masking release , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  A. Nieder,et al.  Signal detection in amplitude‐modulated maskers. II. Processing in the songbird's auditory forebrain , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[22]  Jesko L. Verhey,et al.  Role of Peripheral Nonlinearities in Comodulation Masking Release , 2007 .

[23]  Ray Meddis,et al.  Physiological Correlates of Comodulation Masking Release in the Mammalian Ventral Cochlear Nucleus , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  J H Grose,et al.  Comodulation masking release: is comodulation sufficient? , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Signal detection enhanced by comodulated noise , 2006 .

[26]  B. Moore,et al.  Evidence that comodulation detection differences depend on within-channel mechanisms. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  B. Kollmeier,et al.  Within-channel cues in comodulation masking release (CMR): experiments and model predictions using a modulation-filterbank model. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  N. Cooper,et al.  Two-tone suppression in cochlear mechanics. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  Ian M. Winter,et al.  Responses of Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus Neurons to Signals in the Presence of Modulated Maskers , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  A R Palmer,et al.  Level dependence of cochlear nucleus onset unit responses and facilitation by second tones or broadband noise. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  A. Oxenham,et al.  Forward masking: adaptation or integration? , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  James A. Simmons,et al.  Auditory Computations for Biosonar Target Imaging in Bats , 1996 .

[34]  I. Nelken,et al.  Representation of Tone in Fluctuating Maskers in the Ascending Auditory System , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  K. K. Jensen,et al.  Comodulation detection differences in the hooded crow (Corvus corone cornix), with direct comparison to human subjects. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  A. Kohlrausch,et al.  Binaural processing model based on contralateral inhibition. I. Model structure. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  C. Darwin,et al.  Grouping in pitch perception: effects of onset asynchrony and ear of presentation of a mistuned component. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  S. Hofer,et al.  Within- and Across-Channel Processing in Auditory Masking: A Physiological Study in the Songbird Forebrain , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  C D Geisler,et al.  Two-tone suppression of basilar membrane vibrations in the base of the guinea pig cochlea using "low-side" suppressors. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  R. Shannon Two-tone unmasking and suppression in a forward-masking situation. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  Torsten Dau,et al.  Effects of concurrent and sequential streaming in comodulation masking release , 2005 .

[42]  Joseph W. Hall,et al.  Detection in noise by spectro-temporal pattern analysis. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.