Tooth components of mandibular deciduous molars of Homo sapiens sapiens and Homo sapiens neanderthalensis: a radiographic study.

Tooth components of deciduous molars were measured from standardized radiographs of Homo sapiens sapiens and Homo sapiens neanderthalensis. Enamel height and width were greater in deciduous teeth of Homo sapiens sapiens than in Homo sapiens neanderthalensis and the differences were statistically significant (p less than 0.01). Dentin height showed no significant differences between the two groups, but enamel to floor of pulp chamber and pulp height and width dimensions were significantly greater in Homo sapiens neanderthalensis. Discriminant analysis carried out between groups, using deciduous tooth components, showed an accuracy of 98-100% for identification of Homo sapiens sapiens and 83-92% for identification of Homo sapiens neanderthalensis. The results obtained in this study on dental dimensions support the hypothesis of a distinct evolutionary line for Neanderthals.

[1]  P. Smith,et al.  Population variation in tooth, jaw, and root size: a radiographic study of two populations in a high-attrition environment. , 1989, American journal of physical anthropology.

[2]  C. Stringer,et al.  Genetic and fossil evidence for the origin of modern humans. , 1988, Science.

[3]  B. Wood,et al.  Analysis of the dental morphology of Plio-Pleistocene hominids. IV. Mandibular postcanine root morphology. , 1988, Journal of anatomy.

[4]  B. Wood,et al.  Patterns and rates of enamel growth in the molar teeth of early hominids , 1987, Nature.

[5]  M. Dean,et al.  Crown-formation time of a fossil hominid premolar tooth. , 1987, Archives of oral biology.

[6]  C. Stringer,et al.  Age at death of the Neanderthal child from Devil's Tower, Gibraltar and the implications for studies of general growth and development in Neanderthals. , 1986, American journal of physical anthropology.

[7]  P. Smith,et al.  Post-pleistocene changes in tooth root and jaw relationships. , 1986, American journal of physical anthropology.

[8]  B. Wood,et al.  Variations in enamel thickness and structure in East African hominids. , 1986, American journal of physical anthropology.

[9]  M. Dean.  Variation in the developing root cone angle of the permanent mandibular teeth of modern man and certain fossil hominids. , 1985, American journal of physical anthropology.

[10]  E. Tammisalo,et al.  Enamel thickness in 47,XYY males' permanent teeth. , 1985, Annals of human biology.

[11]  R. Rapp,et al.  Radiographic anatomy of pulpal chambers of primary molars. , 1983, Pediatric dentistry.

[12]  E. Tammisalo,et al.  Enamel thickness of 45,X females' permanent teeth. , 1981, American journal of human genetics.

[13]  T. Cate,et al.  Oral histology: Development, structure, and function , 1980 .

[14]  J. Stoner.  An investigation into the accuracy of measurements made on radiographs of the alveolar crests of dried mandibles. , 1972, Journal of periodontology.

[15]  W. Hylander,et al.  Taurodontism: a biometric study. , 1971, American journal of physical anthropology.

[16]  F. Howell.  Recent Advances in Human Evolutionary Studies , 1967, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[17]  J. Kallay.  A RADIOGRAPHIC STUDY OF THE NEANDERTHAL TEETH FROM KRAPINA, CROATIA , 1963 .

[18]  P. Grøn.  A Geometrical Evaluation of Image Size in Dental Radiography , 1960, Journal of dental research.

[19]  H. Breuil,et al.  The Stone Age of Mount Carmel: , 1938, Nature.

[20]  A. Hrdlička.  The skeletal remains of early man , 1930 .

[21]  K. Gorjanović-Kramberger.  Der diluviale Mensch von Krapina in Kroatien : ein Beitrag zur Paläoanthropologie , 1906 .