Improvements to the representation of orography in the Met Office Unified Model

Three improvements to the representation of orography for use in numerical weather- and climate-prediction models are presented. The first improvement is to replace the US Navy dataset with a new digitally generated dataset as the definition of the true earth topography. There are large differences on all scales between the two datasets and these lead to large differences in the mean and subgrid-scale fields that are derived from them. The second improvement is to filter the mean and subgrid-scale orography (SSO) fields to remove grid-scale and near-grid-scale features and thus suppress forcing on scales that the model cannot treat well. The third improvement is to implement a new, simple parametrization of the effects of SSO in which the total surface pressure drag is calculated using the analytical expression for linear hydrostatic flow over a two-dimensional ridge in the absence of friction and rotation. The surface pressure drag is partitioned into gravity-wave and blocked-flow components that depend on the Froude number of the flow impinging on the SSO. The new scheme attributes about 70% of the total drag to flow blocking. These improvements have been incorporated into a new version of the Met Office Unified Model. A series of numerical weather-prediction experiments demonstrates that the introduction of the new SSO scheme is the most significant change. In particular, significant improvements to forecast skill, attributable to the SSO scheme's flow-blocking drag component, are found at low levels in the northern hemisphere and the Tropics for an extended northern hemisphere wintertime forecast trial. Furthermore, there are no significant degradations in skill at upper levels, in the southern hemisphere or for summertime trials. Copyright © Crown copyright, 2003. Royal Meteorological Society

[1]  A. Grant,et al.  Cloud‐base fluxes in the cumulus‐capped boundary layer , 2001 .

[2]  François Lott,et al.  A new subgrid‐scale orographic drag parametrization: Its formulation and testing , 1997 .

[3]  A. Brown,et al.  Assessment of which scales of orography can be credibly resolved in a numerical model , 2001 .

[4]  Y. Bouteloup.  Improvement of the Spectral Representation of the Earth Topography with a Variational Method , 1995 .

[5]  N. McFarlane,et al.  The parametrization of drag induced by stratified flow over anisotropic orography , 2000 .

[6]  Norman A. McFarlane,et al.  The Effect of Orographically Excited Gravity Wave Drag on the General Circulation of the Lower Stratosphere and Troposphere , 1987 .

[7]  R. Betts,et al.  The impact of new land surface physics on the GCM simulation of climate and climate sensitivity , 1999 .

[8]  B. Hoskins,et al.  Believable scales and parameterizations in a spectral transform model , 1997 .

[9]  David L. Mitchell,et al.  Impact of a new scheme for optical properties of ice crystals on climates of two GCMs , 2000 .

[10]  A. Slingo,et al.  Studies with a flexible new radiation code. I: Choosing a configuration for a large-scale model , 1996 .

[11]  Ronald B. Smith.  On Severe Downslope Winds , 1985 .

[12]  Damian R. Wilson,et al.  A microphysically based precipitation scheme for the UK meteorological office unified model , 1999 .

[13]  G. J. Shutts,et al.  A new gravity‐wave‐drag scheme incorporating anisotropic orography and low‐level wave breaking: Impact upon the climate of the UK Meteorological Office Unified Model , 1998 .

[14]  P. Rowntree,et al.  A Mass Flux Convection Scheme with Representation of Cloud Ensemble Characteristics and Stability-Dependent Closure , 1990 .

[15]  J. Crowther,et al.  Investigating k distribution methods for parameterizing gaseous absorption in the Hadley Centre Climate Model , 1999 .

[16]  M. Holzer.  Optimal spectral topography and its effect on model climate , 1996 .

[17]  H. Ólafsson,et al.  Coriolis effects on orographic and mesoscale flows , 2001 .

[18]  K. Miyakoda,et al.  Reduction of the Gibbs Oscillation in Spectral Model Simulations , 1994 .

[19]  N. B. Ingleby,et al.  The Met. Office global three‐dimensional variational data assimilation scheme , 2000 .

[20]  Piotr K. Smolarkiewicz,et al.  Preconditioned Conjugate-Residual Solvers for Helmholtz Equations in Nonhydrostatic Models , 1997 .

[21]  J. Fritsch,et al.  Numerical Prediction of Convectively Driven Mesoscale Pressure Systems. Part I: Convective Parameterization , 1980 .

[22]  H. Ólafsson,et al.  The Effect of Rotation and Surface Friction on Orographic Drag , 1997 .

[23]  S. Milton,et al.  The Impact of Parameterized Subgrid-Scale Orographic Forcing on Systematic Errors in a Global NWP Model , 1996 .

[24]  J. Wallace,et al.  Reduction of systematic forecast errors in the ECMWF model through the introduction of an envelope orography , 1983 .

[25]  T. Palmer,et al.  Alleviation of a systematic westerly bias in general circulation and numerical weather prediction models through an orographic gravity wave drag parametrization , 1986 .

[26]  A. Brown,et al.  A similarity hypothesis for shallow‐cumulus transports , 1999 .

[27]  A. Lock.  The Numerical Representation of Entrainment in Parameterizations of Boundary Layer Turbulent Mixing , 2001 .

[28]  D. Lilly,et al.  A Severe Downslope Windstorm and Aircraft Turbulence Event Induced by a Mountain Wave , 1978 .

[29]  W. H. Raymond.  High-Order Low-Pass Implicit Tangent Filters for Use in Finite Area Calculations , 1988 .

[30]  G. Martin,et al.  A New Boundary Layer Mixing Scheme. Part I: Scheme Description and Single-Column Model Tests , 2000 .

[31]  Nigel Wood,et al.  Normal modes of deep atmospheres. I: Spherical geometry , 2002 .