DART: A particle-based method for generating easy-to-follow directions

Despite evidence that human wayfinders consider directions involving landmarks or topological descriptions easier to follow, the majority of commerical direction-planning services and GPS navigation units plan routes based on metrically or temporally shortest paths, ignoring this potentially valuable information. We propose a method for generating directions that maximizes the probability of a human arriving at the correct destination, taking into account a model of their ability to follow topological, metrical, and landmark-based directions. We discuss optimization techniques for employing these models and present a method, DART, for extracting model-improved sets of directions in a tractable amount of time. DART employs particle simulation techniques to maximize the probability that the modeled wayfinder will successfully reach their destination. Our synthetic evaluation shows that DART produces improvements in arrival rates over existing methods and illustrates how DART's directions reflect properties of the wayfinder model.

[1]  Kai-Florian Richter,et al.  A Uniform Handling of Different Landmark Types in Route Directions , 2007, COSIT.

[2]  Robert Cohen,et al.  Cognitive Maps of a Naturalistic Setting. , 1978 .

[3]  M. Denis,et al.  Spatial discourse and navigation: an analysis of route directions in the city of Venice , 1999 .

[4]  Daniel R. Montello,et al.  Elements of Good Route Directions in Familiar and Unfamiliar Environments , 1999, COSIT.

[5]  Lars Kulik,et al.  "Simplest" Paths: Automated Route Selection for Navigation , 2003, COSIT.

[6]  Kai-Florian Richter,et al.  A Model for Context-Specific Route Directions , 2004, Spatial Cognition.

[7]  Alycia M. Hund,et al.  Getting From Here to There: Spatial Anxiety, Wayfinding Strategies, Direction Type, and Wayfinding Efficiency , 2006, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[8]  Michael E. Lesk,et al.  Route Finding in Street Maps by Computers and People , 1982, AAAI.

[9]  Benjamin Kuipers,et al.  Following natural language route instructions , 2007 .

[10]  Michel Denis,et al.  When and Why Are Visual Landmarks Used in Giving Directions? , 2001, COSIT.

[11]  Edsger W. Dijkstra,et al.  A note on two problems in connexion with graphs , 1959, Numerische Mathematik.

[12]  Clark C. Presson,et al.  Points of reference in spatial cognition: Stalking the elusive landmark* , 1988 .

[13]  Alexander Klippel,et al.  Algorithms for Reliable Navigation and Wayfinding , 2006, Spatial Cognition.

[14]  Benjamin Kuipers,et al.  Modeling Spatial Knowledge , 1978, IJCAI.

[15]  Kai-Florian Richter,et al.  Simplest Instructions: Finding Easy-to-Describe Routes for Navigation , 2008, GIScience.

[16]  P. Thorndyke.  Distance estimation from cognitive maps , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  Eric J. Vanetti,et al.  Communicating Environmental Knowledge , 1988 .

[18]  Lynn A. Streeter,et al.  How to Tell People Where to Go: Comparing Navigational Aids , 1985, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[19]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  Robust Monte Carlo localization for mobile robots , 2001, Artif. Intell..

[20]  B. Taper.  Publications of the Joint Center for Urban Studies , 1970 .