Constrained additive ordination.

For several decades now, ecologists have sought to determine the shape of species' response curves and how they are distributed along unknown underlying gradients, environmental latent variables, or ordination axes. Its determination has important implications for both continuum theory and community analysis because many theories and models in community ecology assume that responses are symmetric and unimodal. This article proposes a major new technique called constrained additive ordination (CAO) that solves this problem by computing the optimal gradients and flexible response curves. It allows ecologists to see the response curves as they really are, against the dominant gradients. With one gradient, CAO is a generalization of constrained quadratic ordination (CQO; formerly called canonical Gaussian ordination or CGO). It supplants symmetric bell-shaped response curves in CQO with completely flexible smooth curves. The curves are estimated using smoothers such as the smoothing spline. Loosely speaking, CAO models are generalized additive models (GAMs) fitted to a very small number of latent variables. Being data driven rather than model driven, CAO allows the data to "speak for itself" and does not make any of the assumptions made by canonical correspondence analysis. The new methodology is illustrated with a hunting spider data set and a New Zealand tree species data set.

[1]  Thomas W. Yee,et al.  A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR MAXIMUM‐LIKELIHOOD CANONICAL GAUSSIAN ORDINATION , 2004 .

[2]  Leo A. Goodman,et al.  Association Models and Canonical Correlation in the Analysis of Cross-Classifications Having Ordered Categories , 1981 .

[3]  Species Abundance with Optimum Relations to Environmental Factors , 1977 .

[4]  T. W. Anderson Estimating Linear Restrictions on Regression Coefficients for Multivariate Normal Distributions , 1951 .

[5]  M. Palmer PUTTING THINGS IN EVEN BETTER ORDER: THE ADVANTAGES OF CANONICAL CORRESPONDENCE ANALYSIS' , 1993 .

[6]  G. De’ath PRINCIPAL CURVES: A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR INDIRECT AND DIRECT GRADIENT ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[7]  David Whitehead,et al.  Soil and atmospheric water deficits and the distribution of New Zealand's indigenous tree species , 2001 .

[8]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  A Theory of Gradient Analysis , 2004 .

[9]  M. B. Kirkham,et al.  On the origin of the theory of mineral nutrition of plants and the law of the minimum , 1999 .

[10]  H. Ichimura,et al.  SEMIPARAMETRIC LEAST SQUARES (SLS) AND WEIGHTED SLS ESTIMATION OF SINGLE-INDEX MODELS , 1993 .

[11]  T. Yee,et al.  Generalized additive models in plant ecology , 1991 .

[12]  C. Braak Canonical Correspondence Analysis: A New Eigenvector Technique for Multivariate Direct Gradient Analysis , 1986 .

[13]  J. Leathwick,et al.  Intra-generic competition among Nothofagus in New Zealand's primary indigenous forests , 2002, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[14]  E. Heegaard The outer border and central border for species–environmental relationships estimated by non-parametric generalised additive models , 2002 .

[15]  T. Hastie,et al.  Constrained ordination analysis with flexible response functions , 2005 .

[16]  Adonis Yatchew,et al.  Semiparametric Regression for the Applied Econometrician , 2003 .

[17]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Limiting Similarity, Convergence, and Divergence of Coexisting Species , 1967, The American Naturalist.

[18]  Michael G. Schimek,et al.  Smoothing and Regression: Approaches, Computation, and Application , 2000 .

[19]  Trevor J Hastie,et al.  Reduced-rank vector generalized linear models , 2003 .

[20]  J. Friedman,et al.  Projection Pursuit Regression , 1981 .

[21]  J. Oksanen,et al.  Continuum theory revisited: what shape are species responses along ecological gradients? , 2002 .

[22]  G. De’ath,et al.  CLASSIFICATION AND REGRESSION TREES: A POWERFUL YET SIMPLE TECHNIQUE FOR ECOLOGICAL DATA ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[23]  G. F. Gause Studies on the Ecology of the Orthoptera , 1930 .