Mate‐choice copying by females: the advantages of a prudent strategy

Mate choice by females may be influenced by both advertizing traits of males, and behaviour of other females. Here, a simple genetic and behavioural model studies the advantages of mate‐choice copying. From a genetic point of view, a female preferring to copy others’ mate choice adopts a prudent strategy, because her offspring will inherit the same alleles from their father as the other young in the population. The model predicts that a female should copy others’ mate‐choice, unless she encounters a relatively more attractive male than the one she has observed mating, and the attractiveness of the male reflects his genotype. For low or moderate reliability of male signalling, mate‐copying is always predicted, even if the newcoming male is more attractive than the first male. This effect is attenuated, however, when the number of females that have already chosen the first male increases.

[1]  J. Gillespie Natural Selection for Variances in Offspring Numbers: A New Evolutionary Principle , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[2]  Robert M. Gibson,et al.  Mate-choice copying in black grouse , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  L. Dugatkin Interface between culturally based preferences and genetic preferences: female mate choice in Poecilia reticulata. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Lee Alan Dugatkin,et al.  Sexual Selection and Imitation: Females Copy the Mate Choice of Others , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[5]  J. Bradbury,et al.  Mate choice in lekking sage grouse revisited: the roles of vocal display , 1991 .

[6]  D. White,et al.  Mate-choice copying in Japanese quail, Coturnix coturnix japonica , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  L. Dugatkin,et al.  Mate-choice copying under predation risk in the Trinigadian guppy (Poecilia reticulata) , 1996 .

[8]  P. Nicoletto Offspring quality and female choice in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  L A Dugatkin,et al.  Reversal of female mate choice by copying in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata) , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  T. Telecky,et al.  Copying Others, an Evolutionarily Stable Strategy for Mate Choice: A Model , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[11]  Susan U. Linville,et al.  Plumage brightness as an indicator of parental care in northern cardinals , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[12]  S. Pruett-Jones,et al.  Independent Versus Nonindependent Mate Choice: Do Females Copy Each Other? , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[13]  Andrew Pomiankowski,et al.  How to find the top male , 1990, Nature.

[14]  Mark Kirkpatrick,et al.  The Evolution of Mate Choice Copying by Indirect Selection , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[15]  M J Wade,et al.  Female copying increases the variance in male mating success. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  L. D. Green,et al.  Mate copying versus preference for actively courting males by female Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) , 1996 .

[17]  R. Meldola Sexual Selection , 1871, Nature.

[18]  E. Forsgren Mate sampling in a population of sand gobies , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  W. S. Cooper,et al.  Adaptive "coin-flipping": a decision-theoretic examination of natural selection for random individual variation. , 1982, Journal of theoretical biology.

[20]  M. Begon,et al.  Competition and fitness , 1985 .

[21]  M. Boyce,et al.  Optimizing Great Tit Clutch Size in a Fluctuating Environment , 1987 .

[22]  J. Ligon,et al.  Female red junglefowl choose to mate with multiple males , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  Mate selection by repeated inspection: more on pied flycatchers , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek , 1991, Nature.

[25]  Rufus A. Johnstone,et al.  Imperfect female choice and male mating skew on leks of different sizes , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[26]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Is mate choice copying or aggregation responsible for skewed distributions of females on leks? , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  L. Dugatkin Genes, copying, and female mate choice: shifting thresholds , 1998 .

[28]  M. Slatkin Hedging one's evolutionary bets , 1974, Nature.