A study of locomotion paradigms for immersive medical simulation environments

Immersive virtual environments are increasingly used for medical training and rehearsal. Immersive environments can provide realistic context for team training, where success relies on practiced coordination between individual members. Using immersive virtual environments, medical teams can practice in situations that would otherwise be difficult or expensive to create. It has been shown that individuals perform poorly when the training environment differs significantly from practice 2005. Efforts have been made to close this gap using virtual environments. Interacting in a virtual space requires a robust locomotion paradigm. Locomotion paradigms are methods that allow an individual to move and navigate through virtual environments. Locomotion paradigms should be intuitive to the user, and not distract from the central task of medical training. In this paper, we describe and evaluate four locomotion paradigms, Look & Go, Push & Go, Point & Go, and Grab & Drag, using objective metrics to evaluate navigational efficiency. This study was performed with 98 volunteers predominantly of clinical backgrounds. With the comparison between the performances of game-playing and non-game-playing subjects, we have shown that game-playing experiences do not significantly affect the locomotion performances with the four proposed paradigms. The results of this study suggests the Grab & Drag as the best method among four locomotion paradigms in triage/trauma scenarios, where trainees need to find and help patients scattered in a large area.

[1]  Patricia S. Denbrook,et al.  Virtual Locomotion: Walking in Place through Virtual Environments , 1999, Presence.

[2]  Frederick P. Brooks,et al.  Moving objects in space: exploiting proprioception in virtual-environment interaction , 1997, SIGGRAPH.

[3]  Claudia L Johnston,et al.  Pulse!!--A virtual learning space project. , 2006, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[4]  Terry Allard,et al.  Spatial Orientation and Wayfinding in Large-Scale Virtual Spaces. , 1999 .

[5]  Rudy Darken,et al.  The omni-directional treadmill: a locomotion device for virtual worlds , 1997, UIST '97.

[6]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  A methodology for the evaluation of travel techniques for immersive virtual environments , 1998, Virtual Reality.

[7]  Scott Lozanoff,et al.  Virtual patient simulator for distributed collaborative medical education. , 2003, Anatomical record. Part B, New anatomist.

[8]  Ivan Poupyrev,et al.  The go-go interaction technique: non-linear mapping for direct manipulation in VR , 1996, UIST '96.

[9]  T. Ichikawa,et al.  Egocentric Object Manipulation in Virtual Environments: Empirical Evaluation of Interaction Techniques , 1998, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[10]  Mark R. Mine,et al.  Virtual Environment Interaction Techniques , 1995 .

[11]  Sharif Razzaque,et al.  Comparing VE locomotion interfaces , 2005, IEEE Proceedings. VR 2005. Virtual Reality, 2005..

[12]  Marc M. Sebrechts,et al.  HANDBOOK OF VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS , 2014 .

[13]  Dale C. Alverson,et al.  Distributed Immersive Virtual Reality Simulation Development for Medical Education , 2005 .

[14]  Andrea H. Mason,et al.  Reaching movements to augmented and graphic objects in virtual environments , 2001, CHI.

[15]  Hiroo Iwata,et al.  The Torus Treadmill: Realizing Locomotion in VEs , 1999, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[16]  Mary C. Whitton,et al.  Walking > walking-in-place > flying, in virtual environments , 1999, SIGGRAPH.

[17]  Mark W. Scerbo,et al.  An Examination of Surgical Skill Performance under Combat Conditions Using a Mannequin-Based Simulator in a Virtual Environment , 2004 .

[18]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  Travel in immersive virtual environments: an evaluation of viewpoint motion control techniques , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE 1997 Annual International Symposium on Virtual Reality.