Psychological conceptions of randomness

This article presents a critique of the concept of randomness as it occurs in the psychological literature. The first section of our article outlines the significance of a concept of randomness to the process of induction; we need to distinguish random and non-random events in order to perceive lawful regularities and formulate theories concerning events in the world. Next we evaluate the psychological research that has suggested that human concepts of randomness are not normative. We argue that, because the tasks set to experimental subjects are logically problematic, observed biases may be an artifact of the experimental situation and that even if such biases do generalise they may not have pejorative implications for induction in the real world. Thirdly we investigate the statistical methodology utilised in tests for randomness and find it riddled with paradox. In a fourth section we find various branches of scientific endeavour that are stymied by the problems posed by randomness. Finally we briefly mention the social significance of randomness and conclude by arguing that such a fundamental concept merits and requires more serious considerations.

[1]  Alban D. Sorensen,et al.  On Truth and Practice. , 1905 .

[2]  I. Good.  The serial test for sampling numbers and other tests for randomness , 1953, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[3]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[4]  G. S. Tune.  A Brief Survey of Variables That Influence Random-Generation , 1964, Perceptual and motor skills.

[5]  G. S. Tune.  RESPONSE PREFERENCES: A REVIEW OF SOME RELEVANT LITERATURE. , 1964, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  Per Martin-Löf,et al.  The Definition of Random Sequences , 1966, Inf. Control..

[7]  A D Baddeley,et al.  The Capacity for Generating Information by Randomization , 1966, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  A. H. Winefield.  Negative Recency and Event-Dependence , 1966 .

[9]  I. Good,et al.  Corrigendum: The Generalized Serial Test and the Binary Expansion of √2 , 1967 .

[10]  Alastair Cook.  RECOGNITION OF BIAS IN STRINGS OF BINARY DIGITS , 1967 .

[11]  Randomness and the Twentieth Century , 1967 .

[12]  W. A. Wagenaar.  Appreciation of conditional probabilities in binary sequences , 1970 .

[13]  A. Tversky,et al.  BELIEF IN THE LAW OF SMALL NUMBERS , 1971, Pediatrics.

[14]  W. A. Wagenaar.  Serial non-randomness as a function of duration and monotony of a randomization task , 1971 .

[15]  P. Horwich.  Probability and Evidence , 1972 .

[16]  A. Tversky,et al.  Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness , 1972 .

[17]  W. A. Wagenaar.  Generation of random sequences by human subjects: A critical survey of literature. , 1972 .

[18]  H. Arp,et al.  The redshift controversy , 1973 .

[19]  A. H. Murphy,et al.  Experiments in the laboratory and the real world , 1973 .

[20]  G. Chaitin.  Randomness and Mathematical Proof , 1975 .

[21]  S. Golding.  Flies in the ointment: Methodological problems in the analysis of the percentage of variance due to persons and situations. , 1975 .

[22]  Richard J. Fragaszy,et al.  A program to generate Gellermann (pseudorandom) series of binary states , 1978 .

[23]  D. Navon.  The importance of being conservative: Some reflections on human Bayesian behaviour , 1978 .

[24]  W. van den Brink,et al.  Estimation of chance fluctuation under the influence of a representational figure , 1980 .

[25]  L. Cohen,et al.  Are there any a priori constraints on the study of rationality? , 1981, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[26]  J. Alcock.  Parapsychology, Science or Magic?: A Psychological Perspective , 1981 .

[27]  L. Cohen.  Can human irrationality be experimentally demonstrated? , 1981, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[28]  S. Wiegersma,et al.  Sequential response bias in randomized response sequences: A computer simulation , 1982 .

[29]  Lola L. Lopes.  Doing the impossible: A note on induction and the experience of randomness. , 1982 .

[30]  L. Cohen,et al.  The controversy about irrationality , 1983, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[31]  Michael J. Strube,et al.  Tests of randomness for pseudorandom number generators , 1983 .

[32]  Rhythms in biology and other fields of application: Deterministic and stochastic approaches , 1983 .

[33]  Joseph Ford,et al.  How random is a coin toss , 1983 .

[34]  D. Krantz,et al.  The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning , 1983 .

[35]  Studies in subjective probability V: Chance vs. structure in visual patterns. , 1984, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[36]  MUNCHAUSEN'S STATISTICAL GRID,WHICH MAKES ALL TRIALS SIGNIFICANT , 1984, The Lancet.

[37]  P. Ayton,et al.  The evidence for interactionism in psychology: a reply to Furnham and Jaspars , 1985 .

[38]  A. Tversky,et al.  The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[39]  D. Hemsley,et al.  Individual differences in reaction to brief exposure to unpatterned visual stimulation , 1986 .

[40]  A. Neuringer.  Can people behave "randomly?": The role of feedback. , 1986 .

[41]  R R Macdonald,et al.  Credible conceptions and implausible probabilities. , 1986, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[42]  Persons, situations, interactions and error: consistency, variability and confusion , 1986 .

[43]  George Wright,et al.  Tests for Randomness , 1987 .

[44]  Peter Ayton,et al.  Assessing and improving judgemental probability forecasts , 1987 .

[45]  D. F. Marks,et al.  Investigating the paranormal , 1986, Nature.

[46]  Lola L. Lopes,et al.  Distinguishing between random and nonrandom events. , 1987 .

[47]  W. Haseltine,et al.  The molecular biology of the AIDS virus. , 1988, Scientific American.

[48]  Gregory J. Chaitin,et al.  Randomness in Arithmetic , 1988 .