Novel insights from hybrid LacI/GalR proteins: family-wide functional attributes and biologically significant variation in transcription repression

LacI/GalR transcription regulators have extensive, non-conserved interfaces between their regulatory domains and the 18 amino acids that serve as ‘linkers’ to their DNA-binding domains. These non-conserved interfaces might contribute to functional differences between paralogs. Previously, two chimeras created by domain recombination displayed novel functional properties. Here, we present a synthetic protein family, which was created by joining the LacI DNA-binding domain/linker to seven additional regulatory domains. Despite ‘mismatched’ interfaces, chimeras maintained allosteric response to their cognate effectors. Therefore, allostery in many LacI/GalR proteins does not require interfaces with precisely matched interactions. Nevertheless, the chimeric interfaces were not silent to mutagenesis, and preliminary comparisons suggest that the chimeras provide an ideal context for systematically exploring functional contributions of non-conserved positions. DNA looping experiments revealed higher order (dimer–dimer) oligomerization in several chimeras, which might be possible for the natural paralogs. Finally, the biological significance of repression differences was determined by measuring bacterial growth rates on lactose minimal media. Unexpectedly, moderate and strong repressors showed an apparent induction phase, even though inducers were not provided; therefore, an unknown mechanism might contribute to regulation of the lac operon. Nevertheless, altered growth correlated with altered repression, which indicates that observed functional modifications are significant.

[1]  C. Chothia,et al.  The generation of new protein functions by the combination of domains. , 2007, Structure.

[2]  Wendell A Lim,et al.  The modular logic of signaling proteins: building allosteric switches from simple binding domains. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[3]  D. F. Senear,et al.  Allosteric Mechanism of Induction of CytR-regulated Gene Expression , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[4]  J. Miller,et al.  Mutations affecting the quaternary structure of the lac repressor. , 1976, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[5]  B. Müller-Hill,et al.  The three operators of the lac operon cooperate in repression. , 1990, The EMBO journal.

[6]  Hua Yang,et al.  Searching for interpretable rules for disease mutations: a simulated annealing bump hunting strategy , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[7]  Akira Ishihama,et al.  Participation of Regulator AscG of the β-Glucoside Utilization Operon in Regulation of the Propionate Catabolism Operon , 2009, Journal of bacteriology.

[8]  L. Swint-Kruse,et al.  Extrinsic interactions dominate helical propensity in coupled binding and folding of the lactose repressor protein hinge helix. , 2006, Biochemistry.

[9]  J. Trewhella,et al.  Subdividing repressor function: DNA binding affinity, selectivity, and allostery can be altered by amino acid substitution of nonconserved residues in a LacI/GalR homologue. , 2008, Biochemistry.

[10]  L. Swint-Kruse,et al.  Functional consequences of exchanging domains between LacI and PurR are mediated by the intervening linker sequence , 2007, Proteins.

[11]  Kai Ye,et al.  Tracing evolutionary pressure , 2008, Bioinform..

[12]  P. Thomas,et al.  The Use of Orthologous Sequences to Predict the Impact of Amino Acid Substitutions on Protein Function , 2010, PLoS genetics.

[13]  Albert Y Lau,et al.  Functional classification of proteins and protein variants. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Kai Ye,et al.  Multi-RELIEF: a method to recognize specificity determining residues from multiple sequence alignments using a Machine-Learning approach for feature weighting , 2008, Bioinform..

[15]  B. Müller-Hill,et al.  Dimeric lac repressors exhibit phase-dependent co-operativity. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  S. Egan,et al.  Amino Acid-DNA Contacts by RhaS: an AraC Family Transcription Activator , 1999, Journal of bacteriology.

[17]  L. Swint-Kruse,et al.  Comparing the functional roles of nonconserved sequence positions in homologous transcription repressors: implications for sequence/function analyses. , 2010, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  Julio Collado-Vides,et al.  RegulonDB version 7.0: transcriptional regulation of Escherichia coli K-12 integrated within genetic sensory response units (Gensor Units) , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[19]  S. Adhya,et al.  Genetic Analysis of GalR Tetramerization in DNA Looping during Repressosome Assembly* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  Heterologous cooperativity in Escherichia coli. The CytR repressor both contacts DNA and the cAMP receptor protein when binding to the deoP2 promoter. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[21]  William Lee,et al.  Bi-Directional SIFT Predicts a Subset of Activating Mutations , 2009, PloS one.

[22]  C. Wilson,et al.  The lactose repressor system: paradigms for regulation, allosteric behavior and protein folding , 2006, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[23]  J H Miller,et al.  Genetic studies of the lac repressor. I. Correlation of mutational sites with specific amino acid residues: construction of a colinear gene-protein map. , 1977, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  M. Saier,et al.  The catabolite repressor/activator (Cra) protein of enteric bacteria , 1996, Journal of bacteriology.

[25]  Charulata B. Prasannan,et al.  DNA targeting and cleavage by an engineered metalloprotein dimer , 2011, JBIC Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry.

[26]  B. Müller-Hill,et al.  lac repressor forms loops with linear DNA carrying two suitably spaced lac operators. , 1987, The EMBO journal.

[27]  Mikhail S. Gelfand,et al.  SDPpred: a tool for prediction of amino acid residues that determine differences in functional specificity of homologous proteins , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[28]  J. Kahn,et al.  Bacterial repression loops require enhanced DNA flexibility. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  M. Record,et al.  Inhibition of transcription initiation by lac repressor. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  S. Adhya,et al.  Functional characterization of roles of GalR and GalS as regulators of the gal regulon , 1997, Journal of bacteriology.

[31]  Jeffrey Miller,et al.  Genetic Studies of Lac Repressor: 4000 Single Amino Acid Substitutions and Analysis of the Resulting Phenotypes on the Basis of the Protein Structure , 1996, German Conference on Bioinformatics.

[32]  Liskin Swint-Kruse,et al.  Allostery in the LacI/GalR family: variations on a theme. , 2009, Current opinion in microbiology.

[33]  M. Schumacher,et al.  Structural Basis for Allosteric Control of the Transcription Regulator CcpA by the Phosphoprotein HPr-Ser46-P , 2004, Cell.

[34]  M. Capp,et al.  Inhibition of Transcription Initiation buIacRepressor , 1995 .

[35]  J. Chen,et al.  Subunit dissociation affects DNA binding in a dimeric lac repressor produced by C-terminal deletion. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[36]  L. Swint-Kruse,et al.  Functionally important positions can comprise the majority of a protein's architecture , 2011, Proteins.

[37]  Liskin Swint-Kruse,et al.  Integrated insights from simulation, experiment, and mutational analysis yield new details of LacI function. , 2005, Biochemistry.

[38]  D. Wilson,et al.  Characterization and Cloning of CelR, a Transcriptional Regulator of Cellulase Genes from Thermomonospora fusca * , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[39]  B. Hall,et al.  Nucleotide sequence, function, activation, and evolution of the cryptic asc operon of Escherichia coli K12. , 1992, Molecular biology and evolution.

[40]  K. Matthews,et al.  Activity changes in lac repressor with cysteine oxidation. , 1979, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[41]  Benno Müller-Hill,et al.  Repression oflacPromoter as a Function of Distance, Phase and Quality of an AuxiliarylacOperator , 1996 .

[42]  M. Schumacher,et al.  The X-ray Structure of the PurR-Guanine-purF Operator Complex Reveals the Contributions of Complementary Electrostatic Surfaces and a Water-mediated Hydrogen Bond to Corepressor Specificity and Binding Affinity* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[43]  S. Henikoff,et al.  Predicting deleterious amino acid substitutions. , 2001, Genome research.

[44]  K. Matthews,et al.  Engineered disulfide linking the hinge regions within lactose repressor dimer increases operator affinity, decreases sequence selectivity, and alters allostery. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[45]  D. Chasman,et al.  Predicting the functional consequences of non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms: structure-based assessment of amino acid variation. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[46]  D. H. Jones PCR mutagenesis and recombination in vivo. , 1994, PCR methods and applications.

[47]  S. Mowbray,et al.  Conformational changes of ribose-binding protein and two related repressors are tailored to fit the functional need. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[48]  David R. Westhead,et al.  A comparative study of machine-learning methods to predict the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms on protein function , 2003, Bioinform..

[49]  B. Kallipolitis,et al.  Protein–Protein Communication: Structural Model of the Repression Complex Formed by CytR and the Global Regulator CRP , 1997, Cell.

[50]  Marc Ostermeier,et al.  A molecular switch created by in vitro recombination of nonhomologous genes. , 2004, Chemistry & biology.

[51]  R. Horlacher,et al.  Characterization of TreR, the Major Regulator of the Escherichia coli Trehalose System* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[52]  Andrew J. Bulpitt,et al.  Predicting the effect of missense mutations on protein function: analysis with Bayesian networks , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[53]  K. Y. Choi,et al.  Structural characterization and corepressor binding of the Escherichia coli purine repressor , 1992, Journal of bacteriology.

[54]  S. Adhya,et al.  Isorepressor of the gal regulon in Escherichia coli. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[55]  J. Kondev,et al.  Mechanism of transcriptional repression at a bacterial promoter by analysis of single molecules , 2011, The EMBO journal.

[56]  M H Saier,et al.  In vitro binding of the pleiotropic transcriptional regulatory protein, FruR, to the fru, pps, ace, pts and icd operons of Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[57]  Jeffrey H. Miller A Short Course in Bacterial Genetics: A Laboratory Manual and Handbook for Escherichia coli and Rela , 1992 .

[58]  F. Neidhardt,et al.  Culture Medium for Enterobacteria , 1974, Journal of bacteriology.

[59]  S. Alberti,et al.  Dimer-to-tetramer assembly of Lac repressor involves a leucine heptad repeat. , 1991, The New biologist.

[60]  Huan‐Xiang Zhou,et al.  Prediction of solvent accessibility and sites of deleterious mutations from protein sequence , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[61]  M. Hermodson,et al.  Structural homology between rbs repressor and ribose binding protein implies functional similarity , 1992, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[62]  B. Müller-Hill,et al.  Repression of lac promoter as a function of distance, phase and quality of an auxiliary lac operator. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[63]  J. Chen,et al.  T41 mutation in lac repressor is Tyr282----Asp. , 1992, Gene.

[64]  A. Ishihama,et al.  Novel Members of the Cra Regulon Involved in Carbon Metabolism in Escherichia coli , 2010, Journal of Bacteriology.

[65]  Jeffrey H. Miller,et al.  A short course in bacterial genetics , 1992 .

[66]  I. Pastan,et al.  Lac DNA, RNA polymerase and cyclic AMP receptor protein, cyclic AMP, lac repressor and inducer are the essential elements for controlled lac transcription. , 1971, Nature: New biology.

[67]  M C Mossing,et al.  Upstream operators enhance repression of the lac promoter. , 1986, Science.

[68]  F. Whipple Genetic analysis of prokaryotic and eukaryotic DNA-binding proteins in Escherichia coli. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.

[69]  Conrad C. Huang,et al.  UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[70]  Liskin Swint-Kruse,et al.  Experimental identification of specificity determinants in the domain linker of a LacI/GalR protein: Bioinformatics‐based predictions generate true positives and false negatives , 2008, Proteins.

[71]  B. Pettitt,et al.  Fine‐tuning function: Correlation of hinge domain interactions with functional distinctions between LacI and PurR , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[72]  Yuh-Jyh Hu,et al.  Prediction of orthologous relationship by functionally important sites , 2005, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[73]  Alberto Riva,et al.  Bayesian approach to discovering pathogenic SNPs in conserved protein domains , 2004, Human mutation.

[74]  S. Rudikoff,et al.  Purification and properties of Gal repressor:pL-galR fusion in pKC31 plasmid vector. , 1987, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[75]  D. Beckett,et al.  In vivo tests of thermodynamic models of transcription repressor function. , 2011, Biophysical chemistry.

[76]  R. Schleif,et al.  DNA looping. , 1988, Science.

[77]  M. Jansen,et al.  Engineering a Prokaryotic Cys-loop Receptor with a Third Functional Domain* , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[78]  P. Nygaard,et al.  Identification of hypoxanthine and guanine as the co‐repressors for the purine regulon genes of Escherichia coli , 1990, Molecular microbiology.

[79]  B. Müller-Hill,et al.  Specific destruction of the second lac operator decreases repression of the lac operon in Escherichia coli fivefold. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[80]  D. F. Senear,et al.  Role of Multiple CytR Binding Sites on Cooperativity, Competition, and Induction at the Escherichia coli udpPromoter* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[81]  J. Sadler,et al.  A perfectly symmetric lac operator binds the lac repressor very tightly. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[82]  Jacques Monod,et al.  THE PHENOMENON OF ENZYMATIC ADAPTATION And Its Bearings on Problems of Genetics and Cellular Differentiation , 1978 .

[83]  Arend Sidow,et al.  ProPhylER: a curated online resource for protein function and structure based on evolutionary constraint analyses. , 2010, Genome research.

[84]  Donghyuk Kim,et al.  The PurR regulon in Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655 , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[85]  S. Bell,et al.  Charting a course through RNA polymerase , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[86]  A. Riggs,et al.  lac repressor--operator interaction. II. Effect of galactosides and other ligands. , 1970, Journal of molecular biology.

[87]  Frank J. Poelwijk,et al.  Optimality and evolution of transcriptionally regulated gene expression , 2011, BMC Systems Biology.

[88]  Wei Cai,et al.  Prediction of functional specificity determinants from protein sequences using log-likelihood ratios , 2006, Bioinform..

[89]  V. Tretyachenko-Ladokhina,et al.  Flexibility and adaptability in binding of E. coli cytidine repressor to different operators suggests a role in differential gene regulation. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[90]  S. Semsey,et al.  Three-stage regulation of the amphibolic gal operon: from repressosome to GalR-free DNA. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[91]  Liskin Swint-Kruse,et al.  Perturbation from a distance: mutations that alter LacI function through long-range effects. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[92]  Characterization of mutations in oligomerization domain of Lac repressor protein. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[93]  J. Trewhella,et al.  Ligand-induced conformational changes and conformational dynamics in the solution structure of the lactose repressor protein. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[94]  S. Bourgeois,et al.  lac Repressor-operator interaction. VI. The natural inducer of the lac operon. , 1972, Journal of molecular biology.

[95]  S. Adhya,et al.  A family of bacterial regulators homologous to Gal and Lac repressors. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[96]  M. Lewis,et al.  A closer view of the conformation of the Lac repressor bound to operator , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.