Comparison between two-dimensional synthetic mammography reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography for the detection of T1 breast cancer

ObjectiveTo evaluate the interpretative performance of two-dimensional (2D) synthetic mammography (SM) reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in the detection of T1-stage invasive breast cancers, compared to 2D full-field digital mammography (FFDM).MethodsThis retrospective study enrolled 214 patients. For each patient, FFDM and DBT were performed between January and June 2013, and SM was reconstructed from DBT data. Three radiologists interpreted images and recorded visibility scores and morphologies of cancers. Diagnostic performances of SM and FFDM were compared. Percentages of detected cancers and visibility scores were compared for tumour size, and presence of calcifications for each observer.ResultsObserver sensitivity showed no difference for detection with SM and FFDM (P > 0.05). One observer showed a higher specificity (P = 0.02) and higher positive predictive value with SM (95 % CI 0.6–16.4), but the differences in the corresponding values between SM and FFDM for the other observers were not statistically significant. In subgroup analyses according to tumour size and presence of calcifications, percentages of detected cancers and visibility scores were not significantly different.ConclusionsDiagnostic performances of SM and FFDM are comparable for detecting T1-stage breast cancers. Therefore, our results indicate that SM may eliminate the need for additional FFDM during DBT-based imaging.Key Points• DBT plus FFDM increases radiation dose compared to FFDM alone.• Detecting T1-stage cancers with only SM is comparable to detection with FFDM.• Two-dimensional SM may replace dose-requiring FFDM in DBT-based imaging.

[1]  L. Tabár,et al.  The relative contributions of screen-detected in situ and invasive breast carcinomas in reducing mortality from the disease. , 2003, European journal of cancer.

[2]  C. Compton,et al.  The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and the Future of TNM , 2010, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[3]  J. Baker,et al.  Breast tomosynthesis: state-of-the-art and review of the literature. , 2011, Academic radiology.

[4]  L. Liberman,et al.  Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). , 2002, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[5]  L. Tabár,et al.  Early Detection of Breast Cancer: Large-section and Subgross Thick-section Histologic Correlation with Mammographic Appearances , 2007 .

[6]  Per Skaane,et al.  Overview of the evidence on digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer detection. , 2013, Breast.

[7]  Emily F Conant,et al.  Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography. , 2014, JAMA.

[8]  E. Halpern,et al.  Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial. , 2013, Radiology.

[9]  J. Wildberger,et al.  Radiation Exposure of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Using an Antiscatter Grid Compared With Full-Field Digital Mammography , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[10]  Etta D Pisano,et al.  Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. , 2012, JAMA.

[11]  Unni Haakenaasen,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting , 2012, Acta radiologica.

[12]  Sharon Bond,et al.  Screening With Ultrasound at Time of Mammography Improves Disease Detection in Women at Higher Risk for Breast Cancer, but False Positives Increase , 2008 .

[13]  C. Merritt.  Combined Screening With Ultrasound and Mammography vs Mammography Alone in Women at Elevated Risk of Breast Cancer , 2009 .

[14]  T. Kahn,et al.  Average Glandular Dose in Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis , 2012, Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren.

[15]  David Gur,et al.  Time to diagnosis and performance levels during repeat interpretations of digital breast tomosynthesis: preliminary observations. , 2010, Academic radiology.

[16]  Gisella Gennaro,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study , 2010, European Radiology.

[17]  Paolo Peterlongo,et al.  Prospective study of breast tomosynthesis as a triage to assessment in screening , 2012, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[18]  D. Kopans,et al.  Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. , 1997, Radiology.

[19]  Jungnam Joo,et al.  High Volumetric Breast Density Predicts Risk for Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal, but not Premenopausal, Korean Women , 2014, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[20]  Andriy I Bandos,et al.  Comparison of two-dimensional synthesized mammograms versus original digital mammograms alone and in combination with tomosynthesis images. , 2014, Radiology.

[21]  David Gur,et al.  Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  Andriy I. Bandos,et al.  Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. , 2013, Radiology.

[23]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[24]  Emily F Conant,et al.  Clinical implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis. , 2014, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[25]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening , 2006 .

[26]  David Gur,et al.  Dose reduction in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) screening using synthetically reconstructed projection images: an observer performance study. , 2012, Academic radiology.

[27]  N Houssami,et al.  Application of breast tomosynthesis in screening: incremental effect on mammography acquisition and reading time. , 2012, The British journal of radiology.

[28]  David Gur,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[29]  Andriy I Bandos,et al.  Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images. , 2014, Radiology.

[30]  David Gur,et al.  Localized detection and classification of abnormalities on FFDM and tomosynthesis examinations rated under an FROC paradigm. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[31]  I. Sechopoulos.  A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part I. The image acquisition process. , 2013, Medical physics.

[32]  Manuela Durando,et al.  Characterisation of microcalcification clusters on 2D digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): does DBT underestimate microcalcification clusters? Results of a multicentre study , 2014, European Radiology.

[33]  S. Duffy,et al.  Mammographic screening and "overdiagnosis". , 2011, Radiology.

[34]  Mark A Helvie,et al.  Digital mammography imaging: breast tomosynthesis and advanced applications. , 2010, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[35]  Laurie L Fajardo,et al.  Breast tomosynthesis: present considerations and future applications. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[36]  J. Cuzick,et al.  Effect of tamoxifen and radiotherapy in women with locally excised ductal carcinoma in situ: long-term results from the UK/ANZ DCIS trial , 2010, The Lancet. Oncology.