A Novel Mutual-Preference-Based Admission Control Mechanism for Hybrid Femtocells System

Femtocells have been assuming an increasingly important role to improve the coverage and capacity of cellular networks over the next few years. Different from macrocellular networks, femtocells, which are run by an operator, can provide three access modes, i.e., open, closed, and hybrid access. As a compromise of both open and closed access mode, hybrid mode is considered the most efficient for both operators and customers. In hybrid access mode, a femtocell normally prioritizes different types of users, and users always prefer to choose the femtocell with the best signal quality for better service and saving power, giving rise to a unique mutual preference. This unique mutual preference relationship between femtocells and users makes the admission control much more challenging, and no current approach considers this mutual preference when hybrid femtocells are accessed by many users. In this paper, we model a mutual selection admission (MSA) problem for hybrid femtocells and users, aiming to find a stable matching, where both the preference of femtocells and that of users are satisfied under a backhaul capacity constraint. We show that the problem of seeking an optimal stable matching with maximum cardinality is NP-hard, and we propose an efficient heuristic algorithm for solving the MSA problem by seeking a matching with different levels of stability. With extensive simulations, we show that the MSA algorithm can always find a stable matching and have a great rate gain compared with hybrid access for a wide range of users and femtocells.

[1]  Jie Zhang,et al.  Access control mechanisms for femtocells , 2010, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[2]  David Manlove Hospitals/Residents Problem , 2008, Encyclopedia of Algorithms.

[3]  Holger Claussen,et al.  An overview of the femtocell concept , 2008, Bell Labs Technical Journal.

[4]  David Manlove,et al.  Strong Stability in the Hospitals/Residents Problem , 2003, STACS.

[5]  Dong-Ho Cho,et al.  Open or close: On the sharing of femtocells , 2011, 2011 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[6]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Femtocells: Past, Present, and Future , 2012, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[7]  Jie Zhang,et al.  Femtocells: Technologies and Deployment , 2010 .

[8]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Uplink capacity and interference avoidance for two-tier femtocell networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[9]  L. S. Shapley,et al.  College Admissions and the Stability of Marriage , 2013, Am. Math. Mon..

[10]  Yanjiao Chen,et al.  A reverse auction framework for access permission transaction to promote hybrid access in femtocell network , 2012, 2012 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[11]  David Choi,et al.  Dealing with Loud Neighbors: The Benefits and Tradeoffs of Adaptive Femtocell Access , 2008, IEEE GLOBECOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[12]  Hung-Yu Wei,et al.  On-Demand Resource-Sharing Mechanism Design in Two-Tier OFDMA Femtocell Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[13]  V. Srinivasa Rao,et al.  Femtocells: Opportunities and Challenges for Business and Technology , 2009 .

[14]  Yanjiao Chen,et al.  Utility-Aware Refunding Framework for Hybrid Access Femtocell Network , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[15]  Kang G. Shin,et al.  Adaptive Bandwidth Reservation and Admission Control in QoS-Sensitive Cellular Networks , 2002, IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst..

[16]  Kyong-Tak Cho,et al.  Partitioning resource priority regions for hybrid access mode femtocells , 2012, 2012 IEEE 23rd International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications - (PIMRC).

[17]  Sandy Scott,et al.  A Study Of Stable Marriage Problems With Ties , 2005 .

[18]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Open vs. Closed Access Femtocells in the Uplink , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.