Describing scenes hardly seen.

Knowledge about scene categories, the so-called gist, can be extracted very rapidly, while recognition and naming of individual scene objects is a more effortful process. We investigate this phenomenon by presenting action scenes involving two actors for durations varying between 100 and 300 ms. Incoherence was created by mirroring individual scene actors. Upon masked presentation participants had to report content, actors and objects and to indicate whether the scene was meaningful or not. Scene coherence was judged correctly at all presentation durations. Actors were correctly identified in about one-third of the cases even with presentation durations of 100 ms, and identification rate increased up to 80% with longer durations. Identification depended on scene coherence, on the position of agents in the scene, and on the position of actors relative to the fixation cross. These interdependencies of scene and object perception indicate that the visual system seems to be very sensitive to meaningful interactions of living entities. A series of fixations is not necessary to identify actors of a scene.

[1]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Application of eye tracking in speech production research , 2003 .

[2]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  TO SEE OR NOT TO SEE: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes , 1997 .

[3]  Denis Fize,et al.  Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.

[4]  J. Hoffman,et al.  The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Change blindness: past, present, and future , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  J. Henderson,et al.  Object identification is isolated from scene semantic constraint: evidence from object type and token discrimination. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[7]  J. Henderson,et al.  Change detection in the flicker paradigm: The role of fixation position within the scene , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[8]  J. Wagemans,et al.  Ambiguous Figures: Living versus Nonliving Objects , 2004, Perception.

[9]  S. Baron-Cohen Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind , 1997 .

[10]  S. Hochstein,et al.  View from the Top Hierarchies and Reverse Hierarchies in the Visual System , 2002, Neuron.

[11]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  The mind's eye : cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research , 2003 .

[12]  M. Potter,et al.  Recognition memory for a rapid sequence of pictures. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  S. Thorpe,et al.  The Time Course of Visual Processing: From Early Perception to Decision-Making , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  Z. Griffin Why Look? Reasons for Eye Movements Related to Language Production. , 2004 .

[15]  R. Desimone,et al.  Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. , 1985, Science.

[16]  A. Schofield,et al.  Oscillatory motion induces change blindness. , 2006, Acta psychologica.

[17]  S. McDonald,et al.  Models of high-dimensional semantic space predict language-mediated eye movements in the visual world. , 2006, Acta psychologica.

[18]  I. Biederman,et al.  On the information extracted from a glance at a scene. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  C. Koch,et al.  Competition and selection during visual processing of natural scenes and objects. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[20]  D. E. Irwin Memory for position and identity across eye movements. , 1992 .

[21]  J. R. Mounts,et al.  Competition for representation is mediated by relative attentional salience. , 2005, Acta psychologica.

[22]  S. Thorpe,et al.  A Limit to the Speed of Processing in Ultra-Rapid Visual Categorization of Novel Natural Scenes , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  Yuhong Jiang,et al.  Visual working memory for briefly presented scenes. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[24]  Fernanda Ferreira,et al.  Scene Perception for Psycholinguists. , 2004 .

[25]  D. Ballard,et al.  What you see is what you need. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[26]  A. Chatterjee,et al.  Verbs, events and spatial representations , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  H H Bülthoff,et al.  Detection of animals in natural images using far peripheral vision , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[28]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Minding the clock , 2003 .

[29]  Antje S Meyer,et al.  Processing of extrafoveal objects during multiple-object naming. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  G Richard,et al.  Ultra-rapid categorisation of natural scenes does not rely on colour cues: a study in monkeys and humans , 2000, Vision Research.

[31]  M. Potter Meaning in visual search. , 1975, Science.

[32]  Jodi L. Davenport,et al.  Scene Consistency in Object and Background Perception , 2004, Psychological science.

[33]  D. Simons,et al.  Detecting Changes in Novel, Complex Three-dimensional Objects , 2000 .

[34]  Anjan Chatterjee,et al.  Language and space: some interactions , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[35]  P. Perona,et al.  Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  I. Biederman Perceiving Real-World Scenes , 1972, Science.

[37]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[38]  B. Tversky,et al.  Categories of environmental scenes , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[39]  N. Mackworth,et al.  Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[41]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  Why Look? Reasons for Eye Movements Related to Language Production. , 2004 .

[42]  J. Henderson,et al.  Does consistent scene context facilitate object perception? , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[43]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article WHAT THE EYES SAY ABOUT SPEAKING , 2022 .