Contact Area-Based Structural Analysis of Proteins and Their Complexes Using CAD-Score.

Quantifying discrepancies between computationally derived and native (reference) structures is an essential step in the development and comparison of protein modeling and protein-protein docking methods. Measuring conformational differences of proteins or protein complexes is also important in other areas of structural biology such as molecular dynamics and crystallography. There are multiple scores to do that. However, nearly all of them, whether superposition-based (e.g., RMSD) or superposition-free, use distances to measure similarity. CAD-score is conceptually different as it uses physical contacts represented as contact areas. Such representation makes it possible to quantify differences of both structures and surfaces (e.g., protein-protein interfaces and binding sites) using the same framework. A number of studies have found CAD-score to be among the most robust scores. The method is implemented both as a web server and as standalone software available at http://bioinformatics.lt/software/cad-score . Here, we describe how to use the standalone CAD-score software for comparison and analysis of protein structures, interfaces, and binding sites.

[1]  W. Delano The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System , 2002 .

[2]  Yang Zhang,et al.  Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality , 2004, Proteins.

[3]  Kliment Olechnovic,et al.  The PPI3D web server for searching, analyzing and modeling protein‐protein interactions in the context of 3D structures , 2016, Bioinform..

[4]  Krzysztof Fidelis,et al.  Processing and evaluation of predictions in CASP4 , 2001, Proteins.

[5]  Krzysztof Fidelis,et al.  CASP prediction center infrastructure and evaluation measures in CASP10 and CASP ROLL , 2014, Proteins.

[6]  Kliment Olechnovič,et al.  CAD‐score: A new contact area difference‐based function for evaluation of protein structural models , 2013, Proteins.

[7]  Juergen Haas,et al.  The Protein Model Portal—a comprehensive resource for protein structure and model information , 2013, Database J. Biol. Databases Curation.

[8]  Kliment Olechnovič,et al.  VoroMQA: Assessment of protein structure quality using interatomic contact areas , 2017, Proteins.

[9]  Kliment Olechnovic,et al.  The CAD-score web server: contact area-based comparison of structures and interfaces of proteins, nucleic acids and their complexes , 2014, Nucleic Acids Res..

[10]  Kliment Olechnovic,et al.  Comparative analysis of methods for evaluation of protein models against native structures , 2018, Bioinform..

[11]  W. Kabsch A solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors , 1976 .

[12]  Marco Biasini,et al.  lDDT: a local superposition-free score for comparing protein structures and models using distance difference tests , 2013, Bioinform..

[13]  C Venclovas,et al.  Processing and analysis of CASP3 protein structure predictions , 1999, Proteins.

[14]  Kliment Olechnovic,et al.  Voronota: A fast and reliable tool for computing the vertices of the Voronoi diagram of atomic balls , 2014, J. Comput. Chem..