Stylistic Accommodation on an Internet Forum as Bonding

Internet forums are theorized to be important social platforms for peer influence. Current research tends to conceptualize peer influence as adoption processes, investigating whether information received from network contacts stimulate the adoption of a product, service, taste, or attitude. Accordingly, research interest is focused on the first time a product is used. In contrast, the present study investigates mutual and recurrent adaptation between users of an internet forum. This adaptation is theorized to signal engagement in the discussion, which is part of a bonding process. It is essential to internet forum use because this social medium offers no facilities for selecting and evaluating your discussion partners. Using communication accommodation theory, linguistic style matching, and a statistical network model, we analyze style adaptation on an internet forum for the Moroccan minority in the Netherlands. Our results show that posters adapt their style to the style of previous posters within the same thread (discussion) as well as previous posts in other threads within the same section (topic), especially in the case of style elements related to a shared identity. Significant others on the forum—other posters quoted or referenced directly at least two times—also function as style examples provided that they are present in the current discussion. We argue that these effects have wider significance for research into gratifications of online forums for participants and practical relevance for monitoring and moderating discussions on online forums.

[1]  Frank Parry,et al.  Social Consequences of Internet Use: Access, Involvement, and Interaction , 2003 .

[2]  T. Chartrand,et al.  Chapter 5 Human Mimicry , 2009 .

[3]  Hema Yoganarasimhan,et al.  Impact of social network structure on content propagation: A study using YouTube data , 2011, Quantitative Marketing and Economics.

[4]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  Models of reactions to changes in nonverbal immediacy , 1984 .

[5]  Arun Sundararajan,et al.  Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  W. LIoyd SIGNIFICANT OTHERS, THE SELF-REFLEXIVE ACT AND THE ATTITUDE FORMATION PROCESS* , 1971 .

[7]  Sheida White Backchannels across cultures: A study of Americans and Japanese , 1989, Language in Society.

[8]  Sinan Aral,et al.  Identifying Influential and Susceptible Members of Social Networks , 2012, Science.

[9]  Joseph D. Straubhaar,et al.  Ethnomethodology and the Study of Online Communities: Exploring the Cyber Streets , 1998, Inf. Res..

[10]  J. La Guardia,et al.  Interpersonal interactions on online forums addressing eating concerns. , 2009, The International journal of eating disorders.

[11]  Daniele Caramani,et al.  Introduction to the Comparative Method With Boolean Algebra , 2008 .

[12]  Justine Cassell,et al.  The Language of Online Intercultural Community Formation , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[13]  Lauren E. Scissors,et al.  Language Style Matching Predicts Relationship Initiation and Stability , 2011, Psychological science.

[14]  Young Min Baek,et al.  Online versus face-to-face deliberation: Who? Why? What? With what effects? , 2012, New Media Soc..

[15]  M. Wood Language: Contexts and Consequences. , 1993 .

[16]  William B. Gudykunst Theorizing about intercultural communication , 2005 .

[17]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Linguistic Style Matching in Social Interaction , 2002 .

[18]  D. Popescu,et al.  DEMOCRACY ON THE WEB , 2011 .

[19]  J. Woelfel,et al.  Significant Others and Their Expectations: Concepts and Instruments to Measure Interpersonal Influence on Status Aspirations. , 1972 .

[20]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Psychological aspects of natural language. use: our words, our selves. , 2003, Annual review of psychology.

[21]  Romin W. Tafarodi,et al.  A Comparison of Conversational Quality in Online and Face-to-Face First Encounters , 2012 .

[22]  J. K. Johnsen,et al.  Social support in a wired world: Use of online mental health forums in Norway , 2002, Nordic journal of psychiatry.

[23]  D. Levine,et al.  Interventions using new digital media to improve adolescent sexual health: a systematic review. , 2012, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[24]  Scott Wright,et al.  Democracy, deliberation and design: the case of online discussion forums , 2007, New Media Soc..

[25]  J. Coleman,et al.  Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study. , 1967 .

[26]  Thijs Verwijmeren,et al.  Mimicking Attractive Opposite-Sex Others: The Role of Romantic Relationship Status , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[27]  Georgie McClean Multicultural Sociability, Imperfect Forums and Online Participation , 2011 .

[28]  S. Ziebland,et al.  Health and Illness in a Connected World: How Might Sharing Experiences on the Internet Affect People's Health? , 2012, The Milbank quarterly.

[29]  Gary King,et al.  Logistic Regression in Rare Events Data , 2001, Political Analysis.

[30]  Nikolas Coupland,et al.  Introduction the communicative contexts of accommodation , 1988 .

[31]  L. Tickle-Degnen,et al.  The Nature of Rapport and Its Nonverbal Correlates , 1990 .

[32]  S. Feldstein,et al.  Rhythms of dialogue , 1970 .

[33]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  Same Same But Different!? The Differential Influence of Smilies and Emoticons on Person Perception , 2012, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[34]  Daantje Derks,et al.  Emoticons and Online Message Interpretation , 2008 .

[35]  Joseph B. Walther,et al.  The Impacts of Emoticons on Message Interpretation in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2001 .

[36]  Kevin Lewis,et al.  Social selection and peer influence in an online social network , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Tamara Witschge,et al.  Examining online public discourse in context: A mixed method approach , 2008 .

[38]  Dana R. Fisher,et al.  On Utopias and Dystopias: Toward an Understanding of the Discourse Surrounding the Internet , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[39]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Social Consequences of Internet Use: Access, Involvement, and Interaction , 2002 .

[40]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Mark my words!: linguistic style accommodation in social media , 2011, WWW.

[41]  M. Baum,et al.  Barbarians Inside the Gates: Partisan New Media and the Polarization of American Political Discourse , 2007 .

[42]  H. Giles,et al.  Communication accommodation theory: A look back and a look ahead , 2005 .

[43]  Lauren E. Sherman,et al.  Forging friendship, soliciting support: A mixed-method examination of message boards for pregnant teens and teen mothers , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[44]  J. Carroll,et al.  A New Dimension of Health Care: Systematic Review of the Uses, Benefits, and Limitations of Social Media for Health Communication , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[45]  S. Wolinetz Governance and Politics of the Netherlands , 2003 .

[46]  Barry Wellman,et al.  The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..