Indirect tool monitoring in drilling based on gap sensor signal and multilayer perceptron feed forward neural network

In this study, an indirect tool monitoring was developed based on the installation of a gap sensor in measuring the signal related to the tool behavior during the drilling process. Eleven types of twist drills with different tool conditions were utilized to differentiate the sensorial signals based on the tool states. A statistical analysis was conducted in the signal processing, by extracting the gap sensor signal associates from each tool condition, using the skewness and kurtosis features. Multi-class classification was conducted using the multilayer perceptron (MLP) feed forward neural network (FF-NN) model to classify and predict the tool condition based on the skewness and kurtosis data. The architectures of the MLP FF-NN models were varied to optimize the classification accuracy. This study found that the tool condition was correlated to the displacement of the drill machine spindle because the runout occurred when the sensor signal displayed fluctuation and irregularity trends. The peak intensity of the gap sensor signals increased with increasing wear severity of the twist drill. An ideal MLP FF-NN structure was achieved when the classification performance was optimized to be consistent with the learning curve.

[1]  Chia-Hao Kuo,et al.  A PNN self-learning tool breakage detection system in end milling operations , 2015, Appl. Soft Comput..

[2]  Volker Schmid,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Signal Analysis in Medical Imaging , 2003 .

[3]  K. Gnana Sheela,et al.  Review on Methods to Fix Number of Hidden Neurons in Neural Networks , 2013 .

[4]  Dazhong Wu,et al.  Data-driven smart manufacturing: Tool wear monitoring with audio signals and machine learning , 2019, Journal of Manufacturing Processes.

[5]  Geok Soon Hong,et al.  Wavelet analysis of sensor signals for tool condition monitoring: A review and some new results , 2009 .

[6]  Yong Shi,et al.  Review of bankruptcy prediction using machine learning and deep learning techniques , 2019, ITQM.

[7]  Kristian Martinsen,et al.  Prediction of geometry deviations in additive manufactured parts: comparison of linear regression with machine learning algorithms , 2020, J. Intell. Manuf..

[8]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[9]  Robert Heinemann,et al.  A new strategy for Tool Condition Monitoring of small diameter twist drills in deep-hole drilling , 2012 .

[10]  C. Sanjay,et al.  Modeling of tool wear in drilling by statistical analysis and artificial neural network , 2005 .

[11]  Nicolas Piché,et al.  Application of Deep Learning Convolutional Neural Networks for Internal Tablet Defect Detection: High Accuracy, Throughput, and Adaptability. , 2020, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[12]  Katsunari Shibata,et al.  Effect of number of hidden neurons on learning in large-scale layered neural networks , 2009, 2009 ICCAS-SICE.

[13]  Wenbo Chen,et al.  Electricity price prediction based on hybrid model of adam optimized LSTM neural network and wavelet transform , 2019, Energy.

[14]  Jinchuan Ke,et al.  Empirical Analysis of Optimal Hidden Neurons in Neural Network Modeling for Stock Prediction , 2008, 2008 IEEE Pacific-Asia Workshop on Computational Intelligence and Industrial Application.

[15]  Tomislav Staroveški,et al.  on Intelligent Manufacturing and Automation , 2013 Tool Wear Classification using Decision Treesin Stone Drilling Applications : a Preliminary Study , 2014 .

[16]  Issam Abu-Mahfouz,et al.  Drilling wear detection and classification using vibration signals and artificial neural network , 2003 .

[17]  S. Söderberg,et al.  Performance and failure of high speed steel drills related to wear , 1982 .

[18]  Harry R. Millwater,et al.  Classification of drilling stick slip severity using machine learning , 2019, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering.

[19]  Kunpeng Zhu,et al.  The monitoring of micro milling tool wear conditions by wear area estimation , 2017 .

[20]  Jiawei Han,et al.  Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques , 2000 .

[21]  Wei Xue,et al.  Review of tool condition monitoring methods in milling processes , 2018 .

[22]  Lihui Wang,et al.  A big data analytics based machining optimisation approach , 2018, J. Intell. Manuf..

[23]  H. Preisig,et al.  System identification using wavelet analysis , 2011 .

[24]  Francesco Napolitano,et al.  Multiple Sensor Monitoring for Tool Wear Forecast in Drilling of CFRP/CFRP Stacks with Traditional and Innovative Drill Bits , 2018 .

[25]  Chong Nam Chu,et al.  Prediction of drill failure using features extraction in time and frequency domains of feed motor current , 2008 .

[26]  Colin Bradley,et al.  A review of machine vision sensors for tool condition monitoring , 1997 .

[27]  Danko Brezak,et al.  Tool wear monitoring in rock drilling applications using vibration signals , 2018, Wear.

[28]  Kofi Appiah,et al.  A comparative review of dynamic neural networks and hidden Markov model methods for mobile on-device speech recognition , 2017, Neural Computing and Applications.

[29]  T. P. Wilks,et al.  Performance evaluation of TiN-coated twist drills using force measurement and microscopy , 1993 .

[30]  J. Soulard,et al.  An experimental investigation on ultra-precision instrumented smart aerostatic bearing spindle applied to high speed micro-drilling , 2018 .

[31]  Idriss El-Thalji,et al.  Problems with using Fast Fourier Transform for rotating equipment: Is it time for an update? , 2014 .

[32]  Chatchapol Chungchoo,et al.  On-line tool wear estimation in CNC turning operations , 2001 .

[33]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  Neural networks for pattern recognition , 1995 .

[34]  Ibrahim N. Tansel,et al.  Monitoring drill conditions with wavelet based encoding and neural networks , 1993 .

[35]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.

[36]  Adam P. Piotrowski,et al.  Impact of deep learning-based dropout on shallow neural networks applied to stream temperature modelling , 2020 .

[37]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Understanding and improving deep learning-based rolling bearing fault diagnosis with attention mechanism , 2019, Signal Process..

[38]  N. R. Sakthivel,et al.  Tool condition monitoring techniques in milling process — a review , 2020 .

[39]  Kevin Kelly,et al.  Ai-based condition monitoring of the drilling process , 2002 .

[40]  A. Krishnakumari,et al.  Monitoring of drill runout using Least Square Support Vector Machine classifier , 2019, Measurement.

[41]  Ranga Komanduri,et al.  On Multisensor Approach to Drill Wear Monitoring , 1993 .

[42]  George-Christopher Vosniakos,et al.  Optimizing feedforward artificial neural network architecture , 2007, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[43]  László Monostori,et al.  Artificial neural network based tool condition monitoring in micro mechanical peck drilling using thrust force signals , 2017 .

[44]  Tara N. Sainath,et al.  Improving deep neural networks for LVCSR using rectified linear units and dropout , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[45]  R. Deivanathan,et al.  Early detection of drilling tool wear by vibration data acquisition and classification , 2019, Manufacturing Letters.

[46]  J. Pei,et al.  Data Mining : Concepts and Techniques 3rd edition Ed. 3 , 2011 .

[47]  Bo-Suk Yang,et al.  Support vector machine in machine condition monitoring and fault diagnosis , 2007 .

[48]  Muhammad Rizal,et al.  The Application of I-kazTM-based Method for Tool Wear Monitoring Using Cutting Force Signal☆ , 2013 .