Troponisms, necrosettes, enzyme leaks, creatinine phosphokinase bumps, and infarctlets: what's behind this new lexicon and what does it add?

Dramatic improvements in angioplasty technology have allowed initial patient and lesion selection criteria to expand and to include the treatment of complex lesions in critically ill patients. Most recent estimates indicate that 900 000 patients were treated with a percutaneous approach in the United States in 2000 and 1.7 million patients were treated with one worldwide. As the technology has become more complex with the introduction of a variety of stents, atherectomy devices, capture devices, and filters, among others, interventionists have learned more about the procedures and the patients undergoing them. See p 642 In the early years of balloon angioplasty, success rates were low. In the initial National Heart, Lung and Blood Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Registry from 1977 and 1981, clinical success, which was defined as a reduction in luminal diameter stenosis by ≥20% and no death, infarction, or coronary bypass surgery, was achieved in 61% of patients.1,2 Failures were often the result of dissection or refractory acute closure, emergency coronary bypass graft surgery (often required), and Q-wave myocardial infarction (often resulted). Nonfatal Q-wave myocardial infarction occurred in 4.9% of patients and death, nonfatal Q-wave myocardial infarction, or emergency surgery occurred in 8.8%.1–3 There was often nothing subtle about an angioplasty complication at that time. As operator experience has improved and improvements in technology have become available, these morbid complications have decreased markedly. The need for emergency surgery has declined from 5.8% (initial registry) to ≈0.5% (today). Satisfaction from these advances has been tempered by the recognition of just how frequently enzyme elevations result from even successful percutaneous revascularization procedures. The issue of cardiac enzyme elevation (or “biomarker” elevation, in the case of the troponins, which are not enzymes) has become increasingly important for 2 reasons.4–10 (1) The definition of acute infarction has changed, and …

[1]  G. Stone,et al.  Differential Impact on Survival of Electrocardiographic Q-Wave Versus Enzymatic Myocardial Infarction After Percutaneous Intervention , 2001 .

[2]  G. Stone,et al.  Differential Impact on Survival of Electrocardiographic Q-Wave Versus Enzymatic Myocardial Infarction After Percutaneous Intervention: A Device-Specific Analysis of 7147 Patients , 2001, Circulation.

[3]  G. Stone,et al.  Atherosclerotic plaque burden and CK-MB enzyme elevation after coronary interventions : intravascular ultrasound study of 2256 patients. , 2000, Circulation.

[4]  Reeder Gs Elevation of creatine kinase, MB fraction after elective coronary intervention: a valid surrogate end point of poor late outcome? , 1999 .

[5]  Samin K. Sharma,et al.  Creatine kinase-MB elevation after coronary intervention correlates with diffuse atherosclerosis, and low-to-medium level elevation has a benign clinical course: implications for early discharge after coronary intervention. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  R. Califf,et al.  1999 update: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction). , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  G. Reeder Elevation of creatine kinase, MB fraction after elective coronary intervention: a valid surrogate end point of poor late outcome? , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  R. Califf,et al.  Myonecrosis after revascularization procedures. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  Richard P. Lewis,et al.  ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction , 1996 .

[10]  D. DeMets,et al.  Surrogate End Points in Clinical Trials: Are We Being Misled? , 1996, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[11]  H. Tunstall-Pedoe,et al.  Myocardial Infarction and Coronary Deaths in the World Health Organization MONICA Project: Registration Procedures, Event Rates, and Case‐Fatality Rates in 38 Populations From 21 Countries in Four Continents , 1994, Circulation.

[12]  D. Faxon,et al.  One-year follow-up results of the 1985-1986 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Registry. , 1989, Circulation.

[13]  R E Vlietstra,et al.  Comparison of complications during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty from 1977 to 1981 and from 1985 to 1986: the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Registry. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  D. Faxon,et al.  Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in 1985-1986 and 1977-1981. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Registry. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.