The properties of SIRT, TVM, and DART for 3D imaging of tubular domains in nanocomposite thin-films and sections.

In electron tomography, the fidelity of the 3D reconstruction strongly depends on the employed reconstruction algorithm. In this paper, the properties of SIRT, TVM and DART reconstructions are studied with respect to having only a limited number of electrons available for imaging and applying different angular sampling schemes. A well-defined realistic model is generated, which consists of tubular domains within a matrix having slab-geometry. Subsequently, the electron tomography workflow is simulated from calculated tilt-series over experimental effects to reconstruction. In comparison with the model, the fidelity of each reconstruction method is evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively based on global and local edge profiles and resolvable distance between particles. Results show that the performance of all reconstruction methods declines with the total electron dose. Overall, SIRT algorithm is the most stable method and insensitive to changes in angular sampling. TVM algorithm yields significantly sharper edges in the reconstruction, but the edge positions are strongly influenced by the tilt scheme and the tubular objects become thinned. The DART algorithm markedly suppresses the elongation artifacts along the beam direction and moreover segments the reconstruction which can be considered a significant advantage for quantification. Finally, no advantage of TVM and DART to deal better with fewer projections was observed.

[1]  Xiaoniu Yang,et al.  Toward High-Performance Polymer Solar Cells: The Importance of Morphology Control , 2007 .

[2]  Klaus Mueller,et al.  A comparative study of popular interpolation and integration methods for use in computed tomography , 2006, 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro, 2006..

[3]  Kees Joost Batenburg,et al.  Electron tomography based on a total variation minimization reconstruction technique , 2012 .

[4]  S Bals,et al.  3D Imaging of Nanomaterials by Discrete Tomography , 2006, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[5]  W. Ming,et al.  Low surface energy polymeric films from solventless liquid oligoesters and partially fluorinated isocyanates , 2002 .

[6]  Gabor T. Herman Algebraic Reconstruction Techniques , 2009 .

[7]  Lawrence F. Drummy,et al.  Polymer Microscopy: Current Challenges , 2010 .

[8]  R. Egerton Control of radiation damage in the TEM. , 2013, Ultramicroscopy.

[9]  P. Luther Sample Shrinkage and Radiation Damage of Plastic Sections , 2007 .

[10]  Jan Sijbers,et al.  Quantitative Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Catalyst Particles for Bamboo-like Carbon Nanotubes , 2007 .

[11]  L. V. van Vliet,et al.  Image formation modeling in cryo-electron microscopy. , 2013, Journal of structural biology.

[12]  M. Radermacher,et al.  Three-dimensional reconstruction of single particles from random and nonrandom tilt series. , 1988, Journal of electron microscopy technique.

[13]  Avinash C. Kak,et al.  Principles of computerized tomographic imaging , 2001, Classics in applied mathematics.

[14]  Kees Joost Batenburg,et al.  DART: A Practical Reconstruction Algorithm for Discrete Tomography , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[15]  J. Frank,et al.  Double-tilt electron tomography. , 1995, Ultramicroscopy.

[16]  Abraham J. Koster,et al.  Cryotomography: Low-dose Automated Tomography of Frozen-hydrated Specimens , 2007 .

[17]  D Wolf,et al.  Weighted simultaneous iterative reconstruction technique for single-axis tomography. , 2014, Ultramicroscopy.

[18]  S. B. Lo,et al.  Strip and line path integrals with a square pixel matrix: a unified theory for computational CT projections. , 1988, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[19]  D. DeRosier,et al.  The reconstruction of a three-dimensional structure from projections and its application to electron microscopy , 1970, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[20]  Peter Hawkes,et al.  The Electron Microscope as a Structure Projector , 2007 .

[21]  S. Bals,et al.  High resolution electron tomography , 2013 .

[22]  J M Zuo,et al.  Electron detection characteristics of a slow‐scan CCD camera, imaging plates and film, and electron image restoration , 2000, Microscopy research and technique.

[23]  P. Midgley,et al.  Electron tomography and holography in materials science. , 2009, Nature materials.

[24]  P. Midgley,et al.  3D electron microscopy in the physical sciences: the development of Z-contrast and EFTEM tomography. , 2003, Ultramicroscopy.

[25]  P. Gilbert Iterative methods for the three-dimensional reconstruction of an object from projections. , 1972, Journal of theoretical biology.

[26]  P. Midgley,et al.  Three-dimensional morphology of iron oxide nanoparticles with reactive concave surfaces. A compressed sensing-electron tomography (CS-ET) approach. , 2011, Nano letters.

[27]  John C. Russ,et al.  The Image Processing Handbook , 2016, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[28]  T. Nishi,et al.  Transmission Electron Microtomography and Polymer Nanostructures , 2010 .

[29]  R Henderson,et al.  Electronic detectors for electron microscopy. , 2007, Current opinion in structural biology.

[30]  J. Loos,et al.  Critical comparison of volume data obtained by different electron tomography techniques , 2010 .

[31]  P. Midgley,et al.  Recent advances in the application of electron tomography to materials chemistry. , 2012, Accounts of chemical research.

[32]  H. Jinnai,et al.  Transmission electron microtomography without the "missing wedge" for quantitative structural analysis. , 2007, Ultramicroscopy.

[33]  M. Radermacher Weighted Back-Projection Methods , 2007 .

[34]  Heiner Friedrich,et al.  Imaging of self-assembled structures: interpretation of TEM and cryo-TEM images. , 2010, Angewandte Chemie.

[35]  Dirk Niemeyer,et al.  Electron Tomography of Nanostructured Materials – Towards a Quantitative 3D Analysis with Nanometer Resolution , 2010 .

[36]  M. W. Green,et al.  2. Handbook of the Logistic Distribution , 1991 .

[37]  W. Ruijter Imaging properties and applications of slow-scan charge-coupled device cameras suitable for electron microscopy , 1995 .

[38]  Rowan Leary,et al.  Compressed sensing electron tomography. , 2013, Ultramicroscopy.

[39]  Miss A.O. Penney (b) , 1974, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[40]  A. Verkleij,et al.  Electron tomography for heterogeneous catalysts and related nanostructured materials. , 2009, Chemical reviews.

[41]  Inmaculada García,et al.  High-performance electron tomography of complex biological specimens. , 2002, Journal of structural biology.

[42]  José-Jesús Fernández Computational methods for materials characterization by electron tomography , 2013 .

[43]  J. Gregor,et al.  Modified simultaneous iterative reconstruction technique for faster parallel computation , 2005, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005.

[44]  J. Miao,et al.  Electron tomography at 2.4-ångström resolution , 2012, Nature.

[45]  J. Loos,et al.  Time-dependent study of the exfoliation process of carbon nanotubes in aqueous dispersions by using UV-visible spectroscopy. , 2005, Analytical chemistry.

[46]  H. Friedrich,et al.  On Resolution in Electron Tomography of Beam Sensitive Materials , 2014 .

[47]  S Bals,et al.  Advanced reconstruction algorithms for electron tomography: from comparison to combination. , 2013, Ultramicroscopy.

[48]  W. O. Saxton,et al.  Three-dimensional reconstruction of imperfect two-dimensional crystals. , 1984, Ultramicroscopy.

[49]  Volker Schmidt,et al.  The effect of three-dimensional morphology on the efficiency of hybrid polymer solar cells. , 2009, Nature materials.

[50]  D. Mastronarde Dual-axis tomography: an approach with alignment methods that preserve resolution. , 1997, Journal of structural biology.

[51]  A. Kak,et al.  Simultaneous Algebraic Reconstruction Technique (SART): A Superior Implementation of the Art Algorithm , 1984, Ultrasonic imaging.

[52]  T. M. Peters Algorithms for Fast Back- and Re-Projection in Computed Tomography , 1981 .

[53]  C. Koning,et al.  The use of surfactants for dispersing carbon nanotubes and graphene to make conductive nanocomposites , 2012 .

[54]  S. Bals,et al.  A practical method to determine the effective resolution in incoherent experimental electron tomography. , 2011, Ultramicroscopy.

[55]  Earl J. Kirkland,et al.  Advanced Computing in Electron Microscopy , 1998 .

[56]  Gijsbertus de With,et al.  Three-dimensional nanoscale organization of bulk heterojunction polymer solar cells. , 2009, Nano letters.

[57]  K Joost Batenburg,et al.  Quantitative three-dimensional modeling of zeotile through discrete electron tomography. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[58]  R. Spontak,et al.  Transmission electron microtomography in polymer research , 2009 .

[59]  A. Kupsch,et al.  Reconstruction of limited computed tomography data of fuel cell components using Direct Iterative Re , 2011 .

[60]  L. Reimer,et al.  Transmission electron microscopy , 2019, Bancroft's Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques.

[61]  Gustaaf Van Tendeloo,et al.  Three-Dimensional Analysis of Carbon Nanotube Networks in Interconnects by Electron Tomography without Missing Wedge Artifacts , 2010, Microscopy and Microanalysis.