A reassessment of the D.C. gun law : Some cautionary notes on the use of interrupted time series designs for policy impact assessment

Interrupted time series designs are commonly used to assess the impact of gun control legislation, as well as other legal and policy changes. Three common problems in the use of these designs — (1) selection of an appropriate control series, (2) specification of the intervention model, and (S) specification of the time series studied — raise questions about the validity of the conclusions reached in research on the impact of gun control. We illustrate these problems with a critical reassessment of Lofrin et al.'s (1991) evaluation of the 1976 District of Columbia Gun Law. We then use monthly homicide data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Center for Health Statistics to illustrate how careful consideration of these three design issues results in a significantly different conclusion about the effectiveness of the District of Columbia Gun Law. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3053963

[1]  Richard A. Berk,et al.  Applied Time Series Analysis for the Social Sciences , 1980 .

[2]  Gary D. Kleck,et al.  Capital Punishment, Gun Ownership, and Homicide , 1979, American Journal of Sociology.

[3]  Colin Loftin,et al.  The Deterrent Effects of the Florida Felony Firearm Law , 1984 .

[4]  D. McDowall,et al.  Interrupted Time Series Analysis , 1980 .

[5]  D. Campbell,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL AND QUASI-EXPERIMENT Al DESIGNS FOR RESEARCH , 2012 .

[6]  Richard McCleary,et al.  Can Mandatory Jail Laws Deter Drunk Driving--The Arizona Case , 1990 .

[7]  William J. Bowers,et al.  The Bartley-Fox Gun Law's Short-Term Impact on Crime in Boston , 1981 .

[8]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[9]  Colin Loftin,et al.  A Comparative Study of the Preventive Effects of Mandatory Sentencing Laws for Gun Crimes , 1992 .

[10]  G. C. Tiao,et al.  A CHANGE IN LEVEL OF A NON-STATIONARY TIME SERIES. , 1965 .

[11]  M. Holmes,et al.  Plea Bargaining Policy and State District Court Caseloads: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis , 1992 .

[12]  Richard Hay,et al.  Box-Tiao Time Series Models for Impact Assessment , 1979 .

[13]  George E. P. Box,et al.  Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control , 1977 .

[14]  Gwilym M. Jenkins,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1972 .

[15]  C Loftin,et al.  Effects of restrictive licensing of handguns on homicide and suicide in the District of Columbia. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  D. McDowall,et al.  Preventing homicide: an evaluation of the efficacy of a Detroit gun ordinance. , 1991, American journal of public health.

[17]  D. Fife,et al.  Firearms' decreased role in New Jersey homicides after a mandatory sentencing law. , 1989, The Journal of trauma.

[18]  D. McDowall,et al.  MANDATORY SENTENCING AND FIREARMS VIOLENCE: EVALUATING AN ALTERNATIVE TO GUN CONTROL , 1983 .

[19]  Edward D. Jones,et al.  The District of Columbia's "Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975": The Toughest Handgun Control Law in the United States—Or Is It? , 1981 .

[20]  Robert I. Mann,et al.  ECONOMIC RESPONSE TO A CRIME DETERRENCE PROGRAM: MANDATORY SENTENCING FOR ROBBERY WITH A FIREARM , 1984 .

[21]  Franklin E. Zimring,et al.  Firearms and Federal Law: The Gun Control Act of 1968 , 1975, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[22]  Stuart Jay Deutsch,et al.  The Effect of Massachusetts' Gun Control Law On Gun-Related Crimes in the City of Boston , 1977 .

[23]  Abraham N. Tennenbaum.  The Influence of the Garner Decision on Police Use of Deadly Force , 1994 .

[24]  A. Ledgerwood,et al.  Mandatory incarceration for convicted armed felons: a trauma prophylaxis. , 1978, The Journal of trauma.

[25]  Mitchell B. Chamlin,et al.  DETERRENCE OR BRUTALIZATION? AN IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF OKLAHOMA'S RETURN TO CAPITAL PUNISHMENT* , 1994 .