Justice Without Borders

The present research examines how psychological distance influences the weight given to individuating information about targets of justice judgments. Drawing on construal level theory, which links psychological distance to levels of construal, we hypothesize that increasing psychological distance from justice judgments reduces people’s sensitivity to specific features of targets, thereby minimizing the extent to which applications of justice are influenced by target-specific information. Psychological proximity, by contrast, enhances the salience of targets’ idiosyncratic characteristics, thereby leading to applications of justice that are more sensitive to targets’ identity. Six studies, examining various justice principles, support these conclusions. Studies 1 to 3 show that psychological distancing reduces the weight of target-specific features in justice judgments. Supporting the role of construal level in driving these results, Studies 4 to 6 demonstrate parallel patterns when construal level is manipulated directly. This work offers a novel outlook on the role of construal and target characteristics in moral exclusion.

[1]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Traversing psychological distance , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  Sam J. Maglio,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: General Distance from a Distance: Psychological Distance Reduces Sensitivity to Any Further Psychological Distance , 2022 .

[3]  Y. Trope,et al.  What happens why? Psychological distance and focusing on causes versus consequences of events. , 2013, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  William A. Cunningham,et al.  The Importance of Moral Construal: Moral versus Non-Moral Construal Elicits Faster, More Extreme, Universal Evaluations of the Same Actions , 2012, PloS one.

[5]  J. M. Olson,et al.  The Relation Between People's Connection With a Target and the Perceived Importance of Justice , 2012 .

[6]  Jamie B Luguri,et al.  Reconstruing Intolerance , 2012, Psychological science.

[7]  Elinor Amit,et al.  You See, the Ends Don’t Justify the Means , 2012, Psychological science.

[8]  J. M. Olson,et al.  Distinguishing Two Meanings of Moral Exclusion: Exclusion from Moral Principles or Principled Harm-Doing? , 2011 .

[9]  Jolanda Jetten,et al.  Dying and Killing for One’s Group , 2010, Psychological science.

[10]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Flexibility now, consistency later: psychological distance and construal shape evaluative responding. , 2010, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Joseph M. Paxton,et al.  Moral Reasoning: Hints and Allegations , 2010, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[12]  Y. Trope,et al.  Construal-level theory of psychological distance. , 2010, Psychological review.

[13]  J. Graham,et al.  Beyond Beliefs: Religions Bind Individuals Into Moral Communities , 2010, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[14]  Adam L. Alter,et al.  When the association between appearance and outcome contaminates social judgment: a bidirectional model linking group homogeneity and collective treatment. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  Peter H. Ditto,et al.  The motivated use of moral principles , 2009, Judgment and Decision Making.

[16]  Kentaro Fujita,et al.  Moving Beyond Deliberative Control of Impulses , 2009, Psychological science.

[17]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  The Effect of Construal Level on Subjective Probability Estimates , 2009, Psychological science.

[18]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  When values matter: Expressing values in behavioral intentions for the near vs. distant future. , 2009, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[19]  Y. Trope,et al.  The Psychology of Transcending the Here and Now , 2008, Science.

[20]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment , 2008, Cognition.

[21]  Deborah A. Small,et al.  The Scarecrow and the Tin Man: The Vicissitudes of Human Sympathy and Caring , 2007 .

[22]  A. Abram.  The Philosophy of Moral Development , 2007 .

[23]  Y. Trope,et al.  The association between psychological distance and construal level: evidence from an implicit association test. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[24]  Y. Trope,et al.  Seeing the forest when entry is unlikely: probability and the mental representation of events. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[25]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Spatial Distance and Mental Construal of Social Events , 2006, Psychological science.

[26]  Dieter Schönecker,et al.  I M M A N U E L K A N T Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals , 2011 .

[27]  Susan V. Opotow,et al.  From Moral Exclusion to Moral Inclusion: Theory for Teaching Peace , 2005 .

[28]  D. Bar-Tal,et al.  Stereotypes and Prejudice in Conflict: Representations of Arabs in Israeli-Jewish Society , 2005 .

[29]  Paul G. Davies,et al.  Seeing black: race, crime, and visual processing. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  T. Tyler,et al.  PROFILING AND POLICE LEGITIMACY: PROCEDURAL JUSTICE, ATTRIBUTIONS OF MOTIVE, AND ACCEPTANCE OF POLICE AUTHORITY* , 2004 .

[31]  M. Wenzel.  A social categorisation approach to distributive justice , 2004 .

[32]  J. M. Olson,et al.  An Analysis of Empirical Research on the Scope of Justice , 2003, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[33]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Temporal construal. , 2003, Psychological review.

[34]  Joshua D. Greene,et al.  How (and where) does moral judgment work? , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[35]  I. Kant,et al.  Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals , 2002 .

[36]  Y. Trope,et al.  The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. , 2002 .

[37]  Susan V. Opotow.  Reconciliation in Times of Impunity: Challenges for Social Justice , 2001 .

[38]  M. Wenzel.  A social categorization approach to distributive justice: social identity as the link between relevance of inputs and need for justice. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.

[39]  Laura Leets.  Interrupting the Cycle of Moral Exclusion: A Communication Contribution to Social Justice Research1 , 2001 .

[40]  Herbert C. Kelman,et al.  Reflections on the social and psychological processes of legitimization and delegitimization , 2001 .

[41]  Robert J. Boeckmann,et al.  Commonsense justice and inclusion within the moral community: When do people receive procedural protections from others? , 1997 .

[42]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  GPOWER: A general power analysis program , 1996 .

[43]  N. Kerr,et al.  Defendant-juror similarity and mock joror judgments , 1995 .

[44]  Susan V. Opotow.  Drawing the line: Social categorization, moral exclusion, and the scope of justice. , 1995 .

[45]  Susan V. Opotow.  Predicting Protection: Scope of Justice and the Natural World , 1994 .

[46]  Susan V. Opotow.  Animals and the Scope of Justice , 1993 .

[47]  Matthew J. Jorgensen,et al.  An empirical study of moral intuitions: Toward an evolutionary ethics. , 1993 .

[48]  J. Brockner.  Scope of Justice in the Workplace: How Survivors React to Co‐Worker Layoffs , 1990 .

[49]  M. Deutsch.  Psychological Roots of Moral Exclusion , 1990 .

[50]  Ervin Staub,et al.  Moral Exclusion, Personal Goal Theory, and Extreme Destructiveness , 1990 .

[51]  Daniel Bar-Tal,et al.  Causes and consequences of delegitimization: Models of conflict and ethnocentrism. , 1990 .

[52]  D. K. Nagata.  The Japanese‐American Internment: Perceptions of Moral Community, Fairness, and Redress , 1990 .

[53]  Ronald L. Cohen,et al.  Distributive justice: Theory and research , 1987 .

[54]  Robin R. Vallacher,et al.  What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior. , 1987 .

[55]  R. Folger,et al.  Microjustice and Macrojustice , 1981 .

[56]  M. Lerner,et al.  The Justice Motive in Social Behavior , 1981 .

[57]  L. Kohlberg.  Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization , 1969 .