Application of the Relationship-Based Model to Engagement for Field Trials of Genetically Engineered Malaria Vectors

ABSTRACT The transition of new technologies for public health from laboratory to field is accompanied by a broadening scope of engagement challenges. Recent developments of vector control strategies involving genetically engineered mosquitoes with gene drives to assist in the eradication of malaria have drawn significant attention. Notably, questions have arisen surrounding community and regulatory engagement activities and of the need for examples of models or frameworks that can be applied to guide engagement. A relationship-based model (RBM) provides a framework that places stakeholders and community members at the center of decision-making processes, rather than as recipients of predetermined strategies, methods, and definitions. Successful RBM application in the transformation of healthcare delivery has demonstrated the importance of open dialogue and relationship development in establishing an environment where individuals are actively engaged in decision-making processes regarding their health. Although guidelines and recommendations for engagement for gene drives have recently been described, we argue here that communities and stakeholders should lead the planning, development, and implementation phases of engagement. The RBM provides a new approach to the development of ethical, transparent, and effective engagement strategies for malaria control programs.

[1]  A. James,et al.  Next-generation gene drive for population modification of the malaria vector mosquito, Anopheles gambiae , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Annet Namukwaya,et al.  Knowledge engagement in gene drive research for malaria control , 2019, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[3]  J. Lunshof,et al.  Guidance on stakeholder engagement practices to inform the development of area-wide vector control methods , 2019, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[4]  Fredros O. Okumu,et al.  Pathway to Deployment of Gene Drive Mosquitoes as a Potential Biocontrol Tool for Elimination of Malaria in Sub-Saharan Africa: Recommendations of a Scientific Working Group , 2018, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[5]  A. James,et al.  Population modification of Anopheline species to control malaria transmission , 2017, Pathogens and global health.

[6]  S. James,et al.  Results from the Workshop “Problem Formulation for the Use of Gene Drive in Mosquitoes” , 2017, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[7]  M. Wensing,et al.  Patient engagement: WHO technical series on safer primary care , 2016 .

[8]  H. Gluyas,et al.  Patient-centred care: improving healthcare outcomes. , 2015, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[9]  P. Kolopack,et al.  What Makes Community Engagement Effective?: Lessons from the Eliminate Dengue Program in Queensland Australia , 2015, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[10]  Shantanu Nundy,et al.  Relationship-centered care: A new paradigm for population health management. , 2014, Healthcare.

[11]  John M. Marshall,et al.  Guidance framework for testing of genetically modified mosquitoes , 2014 .

[12]  A. James,et al.  A Regulatory Structure for Working with Genetically Modified Mosquitoes: Lessons from Mexico , 2014, PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

[13]  Vanessa Y. Hiratsuka,et al.  Tribal implementation of a patient-centred medical home model in Alaska accompanied by decreased hospital use , 2013, International journal of circumpolar health.

[14]  Katherine Gottlieb,et al.  The Nuka System of Care: improving health through ownership and relationships , 2013, International journal of circumpolar health.

[15]  Michael A. Yonas,et al.  Aligning the Goals of Community-Engaged Research: Why and How Academic Health Centers Can Successfully Engage With Communities to Improve Health , 2012, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[16]  K. MacQueen,et al.  The stakeholder engagement toolkit for HIV prevention trials. , 2012 .

[17]  S. Delany-Moretlwe,et al.  Investing in the future: lessons learnt from communicating the results of HSV/ HIV intervention trials in South Africa , 2011, Health research policy and systems.

[18]  Patient engagement in health care. , 2011, Health services research.

[19]  T. Scott,et al.  Towards a framework for community engagement in global health research. , 2010, Trends in parasitology.

[20]  M. E. Wewers,et al.  Survey of Community Engagement in NIH‐Funded Research , 2010, Clinical and translational science.

[21]  A. Milstein,et al.  American medical home runs. , 2009, Health affairs.

[22]  A. Kamali,et al.  Community engagement in health research: two decades of experience from a research project on HIV in rural Uganda , 2009, Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH.

[23]  Lisa V Rubenstein,et al.  Primary Care Patients’ Involvement in Decision-Making Is Associated With Improvement in Depression , 2006, Medical care.