The compression—rotation stem: An experimental study on the primary stability of a new revision hip stem

Abstract In revision hip arthroplasty with bone defects of the proximal femur, a well-established treatment method is reconstruction with impacted allograft spongiosa chips and cemented implantation of a polished stem. Building on this principle of impacted bone grafting, a femoral implant, which is suited to uncemented hip arthroplasty as well as for uncemented revisions, was designed. This so-called compression—rotation stem (CR stem) is collarless and has flanks which compress the impacted bone chips during implantation and thereby increase the rotational stability. To evaluate the primary stability of this new shaft after impaction grafting, the micromotion was determined using six motion transducers. Under physiological loading conditions with simulation of the muscle activities at the proximal femur the application was dynamically loaded for 15 000 cycles with 1000 ± 500 N and afterwards for 5000 cycles with 1300 ± 1000 N. Uncemented CR stems and the control Exeter stems were implanted in a standardized manner according to the X-Change method. Therefore they were implanted into artificial femora that had been previously resected, hollowed, and filled with impacted human spongeous bone allograft to simulate bone defects. Subsequently, the femora were loaded under identical conditions and the micromotions measured. In the majority of the implantations, no significant differences could be found. In conclusion, similar clinical results for the two stems should be expected.

[1]  J. Parvizi,et al.  Cementless femoral reconstruction in patients with proximal femoral deformity. , 2011, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[2]  V. Jansson,et al.  Erste klinische Ergebnisse mit wärmebehandelten homologen Knochentransplantaten , 2008 .

[3]  A. Fottner,et al.  Proximal loading of the femur leads to low subsidence rates: first clinical results of the CR-stem , 2007, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[4]  D. Kohn,et al.  Extensive intrapelvic granuloma formation caused by ceramic fragments after revision total hip arthroplasty. , 2007, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[5]  Antonius Rohlmann,et al.  Implantable 9-Channel Telemetry System for In Vivo Load Measurements With Orthopedic Implants , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  B. W. Schreurs,et al.  Femoral component revision with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polished stem. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  M. Heller,et al.  Stair climbing is more critical than walking in pre-clinical assessment of primary stability in cementless THA in vitro. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  M. Cho,et al.  Impaction Allografting for Femoral Component Revision: Clinical Update , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  D. Gebauer,et al.  Micromotions in the primary fixation of cementless femoral stem prostheses , 2004, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[10]  D. Berry,et al.  Impacted Cancellous Graft Plus Cement in Hip Revision , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  Angelo Cappello,et al.  Comparative in vitro study on the long term performance of cemented hip stems: validation of a protocol to discriminate between "good" and "bad" designs. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  Dieter Christian Wirtz,et al.  Biomechanische Aspekte der Belastungsfähigkeit nach totalendoprothetischem Ersatz des Hüftgelenkes , 2008 .

[13]  L Cristofolini,et al.  Mechanical validation of whole bone composite femur models. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  J Kärrholm,et al.  Micromotion of femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty. A randomized study of cemented, hydroxyapatite-coated, and porous-coated stems with roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  J. Kärrholm,et al.  Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter? 4-7-year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[16]  W. Paprosky,et al.  Classification of bone defects in failed prostheses. , 1994, La Chirurgia degli organi di movimento.

[17]  A. Timperley,et al.  Contained morselized allograft in revision total hip arthroplasty. Surgical technique. , 1993, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[18]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in two patients. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  W. Plitz,et al.  Forces Acting on the Juvenile Hip Joint in the One‐Legged Stance , 1993, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[20]  A. Timperley,et al.  Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[21]  E P Lautenschlager,et al.  A computer-based biomechanical analysis of the three-dimensional motion of cementless hip prostheses. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  W H Harris,et al.  Micromotion of cemented and uncemented femoral components. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[23]  H. Wagner [A revision prosthesis for the hip joint]. , 1989, Der Orthopade.

[24]  E Schneider,et al.  Experimental method for the in vitro testing of the initial stability of cementless hip prostheses. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  A Rohlmann,et al.  Multichannel strain gauge telemetry for orthopaedic implants. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  J. M. Lee,et al.  Observations on the Effect of Movement on Bone Ingrowth into Porous‐Surfaced Implants , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[27]  Friedrich Pauwels,et al.  Biomechanics of the Locomotor Apparatus , 1980 .