Activity-tracking devices for older adults: comparison and preferences

Research demonstrates that physical activity beneficially influences brain function, quality of life and reduces cardiovascular diseases. Therefore, many projects and technical developments aim to promote physical activity. As a result of the “quantified self”-movement, a great number of wearable technologies, which are mainly developed for a younger target group, emerged on the market. However, there is a lack of scientific studies to establish which systems are suitable for older adults and there is still little known about seniors’ needs and preferences regarding fitness trackers. In this crossover-designed usability study, 20 older adults aged over 60 took part. In the study, all participants were requested to rate the usability of five of the most widely used fitness trackers (Nike FuelBand, Jawbone Up, Fitbit Flex, Garmin vivofit, Sony SmartBand) and were asked about their preferences. Participants had to rate its ergonomic features such as handling, material and design. Overall, the fitness trackers differ a lot in tracking features, design, usability and acceptance of the seniors. We present an aggregated list of requirements for the “ideal” activity tracker for older adults. The results seem to be of high interest for developers, but also for scientists to choose appropriate sensors for technology-based interventions that may promote physical activity.

[1]  K. Volpp,et al.  Accuracy of smartphone applications and wearable devices for tracking physical activity data. , 2015, JAMA.

[2]  Thomas Zimmermann,et al.  Persuasive technology in the real world: a study of long-term use of activity sensing devices for fitness , 2014, CHI.

[3]  J. Naslund,et al.  Feasibility of popular m-health technologies for activity tracking among individuals with serious mental illness. , 2015, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[4]  Aaron C. T. Smith Older adults and technology use , 2014 .

[5]  Fiorella Marcellini,et al.  Use and acceptance of new technology by older people. Findings of the international MOBILATE survey: ???Enhancing mobility in later life??? , 2005 .

[6]  Parmit K. Chilana,et al.  Acceptance of Commercially Available Wearable Activity Trackers Among Adults Aged Over 50 and With Chronic Illness: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation , 2016, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[7]  HomeLab Building a Better Tracker: Older Consumers Weigh In on Activity and Sleep Monitoring Devices , 2016 .

[8]  Martin Schrepp,et al.  Construction and Evaluation of a User Experience Questionnaire , 2008, USAB.

[9]  James A. Landay,et al.  Design requirements for technologies that encourage physical activity , 2006, CHI.

[10]  James T. Miller,et al.  An Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[11]  S. Czaja,et al.  Designing computer systems for older adults , 2002 .