Individual differences in the distribution of sperm acrosome-associated 1 proteins among male patients of infertile couples; their possible impact on outcomes of conventional in vitro fertilization

Summary The aims of this study were to show the existence of individual differences in the distribution of sperm acrosome-associated 1 (SPACA1) among male patients of infertile couples and to examine their possible impact on the outcomes of conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF). The spermatozoa were collected from male patients of infertile couples, washed by centrifugation, collected by the swim-up method, and then used for clinical treatments of conventional IVF. The surplus sperm samples were fixed and stained with an anti-SPACA1 polyclonal antibody for the immunocytochemistry. In the clinical IVF treatments, fertilization rates and blastocyst development rates were evaluated. The immunocytochemical observations revealed that SPACA1 were localized definitely in the acrosomal equatorial segment and variedly in the acrosomal principal segment. Specifically, the detection patterns of SPACA1 in the acrosomal principal segment could be classified into three categories: (A) strong, (B) intermediate or faint, and (C) almost no immunofluorescence. The SPACA1 indexes were largely different among male patients with the wide range from 13 to 199 points. The SPACA1 indexes were significantly correlated with developmental rates of embryos to blastocysts (r = 0.829, P = 0.00162), although they were barely associated with fertilization rates at 19 h after insemination (r = 0.289, P = 0.389). These results suggest that the distribution of SPACA1 in sperm affects the outcomes of conventional IVF. In conclusion, this study provides initial data to promote large-scale clinical investigation to demonstrate that the SPACA1 indexes are valid as molecular biomarkers that can predict the effectiveness of conventional IVF of infertile couples.

[1]  M. Fukushima,et al.  Effects of acrosomal conditions of frozen-thawed spermatozoa on the results of artificial insemination in Japanese Black cattle , 2015, The Journal of reproduction and development.

[2]  W. Holt,et al.  Do sperm possess a molecular passport? Mechanistic insights into sperm selection in the female reproductive tract. , 2015, Molecular human reproduction.

[3]  M. Jukič,et al.  Sperm DNA integrity testing: big halo is a good predictor of embryo quality and pregnancy after conventional IVF , 2014, Andrology.

[4]  S. Ge,et al.  Comparative analysis of three sperm DNA damage assays and sperm nuclear protein content in couples undergoing assisted reproduction treatment. , 2014, Human reproduction.

[5]  A. Umezawa,et al.  Seminal vesicle protein SVS2 is required for sperm survival in the uterus , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  R. Aitken,et al.  Sperm capacitation: a distant landscape glimpsed but unexplored. , 2013, Molecular human reproduction.

[7]  M. Okabe The cell biology of mammalian fertilization , 2013, Development.

[8]  T. Almeida-Santos,et al.  Evaluation of human sperm chromatin status after selection using a modified Diff‐Quik stain indicates embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes following in vitro fertilization , 2013, Andrology.

[9]  R. Bronson,et al.  The source and significance of DNA damage in human spermatozoa; a commentary on diagnostic strategies and straw man fallacies. , 2013, Molecular human reproduction.

[10]  F. A. Lai,et al.  PLCζ and the initiation of Ca(2+) oscillations in fertilizing mammalian eggs. , 2013, Cell calcium.

[11]  M. Ikawa,et al.  SPACA1-deficient male mice are infertile with abnormally shaped sperm heads reminiscent of globozoospermia , 2012, Development.

[12]  K. Niakan,et al.  Human pre-implantation embryo development , 2012, Development.

[13]  R. Yanagimachi Fertilization studies and assisted fertilization in mammals: their development and future. , 2012, The Journal of reproduction and development.

[14]  Elaine Z. Murray,et al.  The staining pattern of human sperm with Diff Quik: relationship with sperm head morphology and a sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA). , 2011, Reproductive biology.

[15]  W. Holt,et al.  The oviduct as a complex mediator of mammalian sperm function and selection , 2010, Molecular reproduction and development.

[16]  M. Fukushima,et al.  Relationship of protein tyrosine phosphorylation state with tolerance to frozen storage and the potential to undergo cyclic AMP‐dependent hyperactivation in the spermatozoa of Japanese Black bulls , 2010, Molecular reproduction and development.

[17]  T. Baba,et al.  Mice Lacking Two Sperm Serine Proteases, ACR and PRSS21, Are Subfertile, but the Mutant Sperm Are Infertile In Vitro1 , 2010, Biology of reproduction.

[18]  Organización Mundial de la Salud WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen , 2010 .

[19]  E. M. Eddy,et al.  CHAPTER 1 – The Spermatozoon , 2006 .

[20]  J. D. Neill,et al.  Knobil and Neill's Physiology of reproduction , 2006 .

[21]  M. Ensslin,et al.  Mammalian fertilization , 2004, Current Biology.

[22]  H. Harayama Viability and protein phosphorylation patterns of boar spermatozoa agglutinated by treatment with a cell-permeable cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate analog. , 2003, Journal of andrology.

[23]  B. Sen,et al.  SAMP32, a Testis-Specific, Isoantigenic Sperm Acrosomal Membrane-Associated Protein1 , 2002, Biology of reproduction.

[24]  Dk Gardner,et al.  In-vitro culture of human blastocysts , 1999 .

[25]  J. D. Neill,et al.  The Physiology of reproduction , 1988 .

[26]  P. C. Steptoe,et al.  BIRTH AFTER THE REIMPLANTATION OF A HUMAN EMBRYO , 1978, The Lancet.

[27]  J. R. Lodge,et al.  The Spermatozoon , 2015, Perspectives in biology and medicine.