The effect of visual deprivation on perceptual behavior.

Abstract Monocularly reared cats manifest profound initial deficiencies in perceptualmotor coordination, in depth estimation on a visual cliff, and in the ability to discriminate visual forms differing in orientation when using only their deprived eyes. When the cats were subsequently exposed to a normal visual environment, not all these deficits proved permanent. Only the discrimination of visual form, the interocular transfer of form discrimination from the deprived to the experienced eye, and fine visually-guided spatial adjustments remained permanently absent. The more permanent visual deficiencies cannot be attributed to scotomata nor to losses in visual resolution, since measurements of visual acuity utilizing an optokinetic response elicited by fine black moving lines did not reveal large losses in resolution. The comparison of the neurophysiological and behavioral analysis on the same visually deprived cats leads us to conclude that visual cortex neurons with very selective receptive fields are particularly important in mediating visual form discrimination and fine spatial adjustments.

[1]  A. Riesen,et al.  Interocular transfer of habits learned monocularly in visually naive and visually experienced cats. , 1953, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[2]  D. Hubel,et al.  Extent of recovery from the effects of visual deprivation in kittens. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  E. Gibson,et al.  A comparative and analytical study of visual depth perception. , 1961 .

[4]  R. Held,et al.  MOVEMENT-PRODUCED STIMULATION IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF VISUALLY GUIDED BEHAVIOR. , 1963, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[5]  S. Hecht,et al.  THE VISIBILITY OF SINGLE LINES AT VARIOUS ILLUMINATIONS AND THE RETINAL BASIS OF VISUAL RESOLUTION , 1939, The Journal of general physiology.

[6]  B. L. Baxter Effect of visual deprivation during postnatal maturation on the electroencephalogram of the cat. , 1966, Experimental neurology.

[7]  Karl U. Smith Visual Discrimination in the Cat: VI. The Relation Between Pattern Vision and Visual Acuity and the Optic Projection Centers of the Nervous System , 1938 .

[8]  Karl U. Smith,et al.  The Functions of the Visual Cortex in Optic Nystagmus at Different Velocities of Movement in the Visual Field , 1940 .

[9]  D. Hubel,et al.  RECEPTIVE FIELDS OF CELLS IN STRIATE CORTEX OF VERY YOUNG, VISUALLY INEXPERIENCED KITTENS. , 1963, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  R. Held,et al.  Dissociation of the Visual Placing Response into Elicited and Guided Components , 1967, Science.

[11]  D. Hubel,et al.  Comparison of the effects of unilateral and bilateral eye closure on cortical unit responses in kittens. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  K. Chow,et al.  Interocular transfer of learning in visually naive and experienced infant chimpanzees. , 1955, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[13]  Riesen Ah,et al.  Interocular transfer of habits in cats after alternating monocular visual experience. , 1956 .

[14]  L. Ganz,et al.  The selective effect of visual deprivation on receptive field shape determined neurophysiologically. , 1968, Experimental neurology.

[15]  A H RIESEN,et al.  Visual movement and intensity discrimination in cats after early deprivation of pattern vision. , 1959, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[16]  D. Hubel,et al.  SINGLE-CELL RESPONSES IN STRIATE CORTEX OF KITTENS DEPRIVED OF VISION IN ONE EYE. , 1963, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  K. S. Lashley,et al.  The mechanism of vision. XVI. The functioning of small remnants of the visual cortex , 1939 .

[18]  W. Reichardt,et al.  Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system , 1961 .