Project Organization Structure and Design Coordination in Architecture and Engineering Design Projects: An Advanced Structural Contingency Perspective

Peter Morris calls for attention to the front-end in construction project. Design stage is an important part in the front-end of construction project. Due to lack of coordination amongst different professionals in design stage, information inconsistency (e.g. clash) amongst different disciplines (e.g. architecture, structure engineering) results in delay and cost overrun in construction stage. How to design project organization structure in design team in order to improve design coordination performance is concerned. Structural contingency theory argues that there is no best organization structure. The effect of organization structure on performance depends on task uncertainty. However, organization structure does not react sensitively to contingency change. But project organization structure, as a temporary organization structure is much easier to be adjusted. Coordination is an information processing activity to deal with task uncertainty. It is postulated that project organization structure affect project performance by facilitating or prohibiting information processing to reduce task uncertainty. Incorporating structure-conduct-performance perspective into traditional structural contingency theory, an advanced structural contingency framework is developed to investigate the relationship between project organization structure and project performance. It is postulated that, when task uncertainty changes its level, performance restores by organization structure-conduct adapting to fit new information processing requirement. A case study is conducted to test the framework. The advanced framework helps to understand how project organization structure affects project performance from a more systematical and process view.

[1]  K. Boulding,et al.  Barriers to New Competition: Their Character and Consequences in Manufacturing Industries. , 1957 .

[2]  E. Brech,et al.  Organisation : the framework of management , 1965 .

[3]  Robert E. Stauffer,et al.  THE STRUCTURE OF SMALL BUREAUCRACIES , 1966 .

[4]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations , 1967 .

[5]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[6]  R. Dewar,et al.  Elite Values Versus Organizational Structure in Predicting Innovation , 1973 .

[7]  M. D. Dunnette,et al.  The Measurement of Organizational Effectiveness: A Review of Relevant Research and Opinion , 1974 .

[8]  J. Child.  MANAGERIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH COMPANY PERFORMANCE PART I , 1974 .

[9]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations , 1976 .

[10]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Organization Design , 1977 .

[11]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Information Processing as an Integrating Concept in Organizational Design. , 1978 .

[12]  D. R. Dalton,et al.  Organization Structure and Performance: A Critical Review , 1980 .

[13]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[14]  G. Walker,et al.  The dynamics of interorganizational coordination. , 1984, Administrative science quarterly.

[15]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. , 1985 .

[16]  Richard E. Caves,et al.  American Industry: Structure, Conduct, Performance , 1992 .

[17]  Anders Söderholm,et al.  A theory of the temporary organization , 1995 .

[18]  B. Gerhart,et al.  The Impact of Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance: Progress and Prospects , 1996 .

[19]  Tarek Hegazy,et al.  Towards effective design coordination: a questionnaire survey 1 , 1998 .

[20]  L. Donaldson.  The Contingency Theory of Organizations , 2001 .

[21]  R. Müller,et al.  On the nature of the project as a temporary organization , 2003 .

[22]  Børge Obel,et al.  Organizational Design : A Step-by-Step Approach , 2006 .

[23]  G. DeSanctis,et al.  Organizational Design by Richard M. Burton , 2011 .

[24]  Lex Donaldson,et al.  The Benefits of Persisting With Paradigms in Organizational Research , 2011 .

[25]  Jonas Söderlund,et al.  The P-Form Corporation , 2011 .

[26]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Returning to the Frontier of Contingency Theory of Organizational and Institutional Designs , 2013 .

[27]  Peter M. Ralston,et al.  A Structure-Conduct-Performance Perspective of How Strategic Supply Chain Integration Affects Firm Performance , 2014 .

[28]  Ben Nanfeng Luo,et al.  The Aston Programme Contribution to Organizational Research: A Literature Review , 2014 .