In vitro biological assessment of electrode materials for neural interfaces

The development of the next generation electrode interfaces for neural prosthetic devices requires high-through-put multifaceted testing strategies to assess material interactions with both peripheral and central nervous system (CNS) immune cells. The utility of a primary astrocyte enriched glial cell culture was assessed as a potential in vitro tool for understanding the immune response to electrode materials. Conductive polymer consisting of electropolymerized poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) doped with paratoluene sulfonate (pTS) was used as a novel electrode material and compared to the conventional electrode material, platinum (Pt). Morphology of astrocytes and microglia in contact with the materials was analyzed and compared to an immunoassay of TNFα release from human blood plasma. While all electrode materials failed to stimulate TNFα release from human leukocytes, the materials in contact with glial cells resulted in progressive reactive gliosis. This primary astrocyte in vitro assay provides insight into the degeneration of electrode performance in vivo as a result of scar tissue reactions in chronic implant devices. It also highlights the relevance of testing for immune reactions with an appropriate cell system.

[1]  Andrew J. Woolley,et al.  Chronic intracortical microelectrode arrays induce non-uniform, depth-related tissue responses , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[2]  D. Grainger,et al.  A critical evaluation of in vitro cell culture models for high-throughput drug screening and toxicity. , 2012, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[3]  T. Yamamoto,et al.  Long-term cultured astrocytes inhibit myelin formation, but not axonal growth in the co-cultured nerve tissue , 1995, Multiple sclerosis.

[4]  Matthew M. Holecko,et al.  In vitro assessment of bioactive coatings for neural implant applications. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[5]  David C. Martin,et al.  Chronic neural recordings using silicon microelectrode arrays electrochemically deposited with a poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) film , 2006, Journal of neural engineering.

[6]  Nigel H. Lovell,et al.  Organic electrode coatings for next-generation neural interfaces , 2014, Front. Neuroeng..

[7]  D. Szarowski,et al.  Cerebral Astrocyte Response to Micromachined Silicon Implants , 1999, Experimental Neurology.

[8]  Herbert F. Jelinek,et al.  Quantitating the subtleties of microglial morphology with fractal analysis , 2013, Front. Cell. Neurosci..

[9]  Jean-Marc Fellous,et al.  In vitro model of glial scarring around neuroelectrodes chronically implanted in the CNS. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[10]  M. Sofroniew,et al.  Reactive Gliosis and the Multicellular Response to CNS Damage and Disease , 2014, Neuron.

[11]  J. Silver,et al.  Reduction of neurite outgrowth in a model of glial scarring following CNS injury is correlated with the expression of inhibitory molecules on reactive astrocytes , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[12]  J. Silver,et al.  Functional regeneration beyond the glial scar , 2014, Experimental Neurology.

[13]  N Wisniewski,et al.  Characterization of implantable biosensor membrane biofouling , 2000, Fresenius' journal of analytical chemistry.

[14]  Vadim S. Polikov,et al.  Biocompatibility assessment of insulating silicone polymer coatings using an in vitro glial scar assay. , 2010, Macromolecular bioscience.

[15]  P. Tresco,et al.  Response of brain tissue to chronically implanted neural electrodes , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[16]  Nigel H Lovell,et al.  Cell attachment functionality of bioactive conducting polymers for neural interfaces. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[17]  M. Nilsson,et al.  Astrocyte activation and reactive gliosis , 2005, Glia.

[18]  R. G. Richards,et al.  Animal models for implant biomaterial research in bone: a review. , 2007, European cells & materials.

[19]  R. Banati,et al.  Visualising microglial activation in vivo , 2002, Glia.

[20]  D. Szarowski,et al.  Brain responses to micro-machined silicon devices , 2003, Brain Research.

[21]  A. Sorenson,et al.  Myelinated, synapsing cultures of murine spinal cord – validation as an in vitro model of the central nervous system , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[22]  R. Bellamkonda,et al.  Biomaterials for the central nervous system , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[23]  Nigel H Lovell,et al.  Impact of co-incorporating laminin peptide dopants and neurotrophic growth factors on conducting polymer properties. , 2010, Acta biomaterialia.

[24]  G. Wallace,et al.  Conducting polymers for neural interfaces: challenges in developing an effective long-term implant. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[25]  J. P. Schwartz,et al.  Cell culture models for reactive gliosis: New perspectives , 1998, Journal of neuroscience research.