Ecological Risk Assessment and Problem Formulation for Lake Uluabat, a Ramsar State in Turkey

Unlike the United States and the European Union, developing countries do not have sufficiently structured legal and institutional systems to apply certain environmental management tools such as ecological risk assessment. However, it is important for countries with valuable environmental and ecological resources to have appropriate tools and to strengthen their environmental management capabilities and capacities for the sake of those resources. The case study described in this paper attempts to be a case study towards developing environmental management plans, especially in developing countries. The problem formulation step of Ecological Risk Assessment applied in this study contributed to the basic elements of an environmental management plan including the following: the partnership-building process, prioritization of the problems and issues of the ecosystem, and development of the action plan. Based on the information provided by participants from a series of workshops held to develop an environmental management plan for Uluabat Lake, ecosystem risks were ranked and an action plan was formed. The results obtained with the aid of fuzzy set theory provided a base for identification of the action steps by allowing scientific information to be included in the process. The degree to which Uluabat Lake’s problem formulation fits into the existing legal framework of Turkey is also analyzed in this paper.

[1]  M. Power,et al.  Perspectives of the Scientific Community on the Status of Ecological Risk Assessment , 1997 .

[2]  Biodiversity: new trends in Environmental Management , 2001 .

[3]  M. Power,et al.  Fallacies in ecological risk assessment practices , 1997 .

[4]  B. Preston,et al.  Indirect Effects in Aquatic Ecotoxicology: Implications for Ecological Risk Assessment , 2002, Environmental management.

[5]  G W Suter.  Generic assessment endpoints are needed for ecological risk assessment. , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[6]  L. Buydens,et al.  A Procedure for Incorporating Spatial Variability in Ecological Risk Assessment of Dutch River Floodplains , 2001, Environmental management.

[7]  C. Sampford,et al.  Environmental Governance for Biodiversity , 2002 .

[8]  G. W. Suter,et al.  Guide for developing conceptual models for ecological risk assessments , 1996 .

[9]  VICTOR B. SERVEISS,et al.  Applying Ecological Risk Principles to Watershed Assessment and Management , 2002, Environmental management.

[10]  C. Wood,et al.  A comparative evaluation of the EIA systems in Egypt, Turkey and Tunisia , 2002 .

[11]  K. Solomon,et al.  New concepts in ecological risk assessment: where do we go from here? , 2002, Marine pollution bulletin.

[12]  James E. Weber,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL AUDITING: An Approach for Characterizing Tropospheric Ozone Risk to Forests , 1997, Environmental management.

[13]  A. Dennis Lemly.  PROFILE: Risk Assessment as an Environmental Management Tool: Considerations for Freshwater Wetlands , 1997, Environmental management.

[14]  INVESTIGATION OF MULTI-TEMPORAL LAND USE/COVER AND SHORELINE CHANGES OF THE ULUABAT LAKE RAMSAR SITE USING RS AND GIS , 2002 .

[15]  An Assessment of Ecosystem Risks in the St. Croix National Scenic Riverway , 2000, Environmental management.

[16]  T. McDaniels.  Creating and using objectives for ecological risk assessment and management , 2000 .

[17]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Fuzzy Relation Analysis for Multicriteria Water Resources Management , 1999 .

[18]  Robert B. Wenger,et al.  A method for assessing environmental risk: A case study of Green Bay, Lake Michigan, USA , 1994 .