Quantitative Profiling of Ubiquitylated Proteins Reveals Proteasome Substrates and the Substrate Repertoire Influenced by the Rpn10 Receptor Pathway*S

The ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) comprises hundreds of different conjugation/deconjugation enzymes and multiple receptors that recognize ubiquitylated proteins. A formidable challenge to deciphering the biology of ubiquitin is to map the networks of substrates and ligands for components of the UPS. Several different receptors guide ubiquitylated substrates to the proteasome, and neither the basis for specificity nor the relative contribution of each pathway is known. To address how broad of a role the ubiquitin receptor Rpn10 (S5a) plays in turnover of proteasome substrates, we implemented a method to perform quantitative analysis of ubiquitin conjugates affinity-purified from experimentally perturbed and reference cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae that were differentially labeled with 14N and 15N isotopes. Shotgun mass spectrometry coupled with relative quantification using metabolic labeling and statistical analysis based on q values revealed ubiquitylated proteins that increased or decreased in level in response to a particular treatment. We first identified over 225 candidate UPS substrates that accumulated as ubiquitin conjugates upon proteasome inhibition. To determine which of these proteins were influenced by Rpn10, we evaluated the ubiquitin conjugate proteomes in cells lacking either the entire Rpn10 (rpn10Δ) (or only its UIM (ubiquitin-interacting motif) polyubiquitin-binding domain (uimΔ)). Twenty-seven percent of the UPS substrates accumulated as ubiquitylated species in rpn10Δ cells, whereas only one-fifth as many accumulated in uimΔ cells. These findings underscore a broad role for Rpn10 in turnover of ubiquitylated substrates but a relatively modest role for its ubiquitin-binding UIM domain. This approach illustrates the feasibility of systems-level quantitative analysis to map enzyme-substrate networks in the UPS.

[1]  Y. Xiong,et al.  Cytoplasmic localized ubiquitin ligase cullin 7 binds to p53 and promotes cell growth by antagonizing p53 function , 2006, Oncogene.

[2]  J. Neefjes,et al.  The Journal of Cell Biology , 2002 .

[3]  Pierre Baldi,et al.  A Tandem Affinity Tag for Two-step Purification under Fully Denaturing Conditions , 2006, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[4]  J. Hoheisel Microarray technology: beyond transcript profiling and genotype analysis , 2006, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[5]  N. Shabek,et al.  Unique Role for the UbL-UbA Protein Ddi1 in Turnover of SCFUfo1 Complexes , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[6]  Wei Gu,et al.  p53 ubiquitination: Mdm2 and beyond. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[7]  Toshihide Nishimura,et al.  Large‐scale analysis of the human ubiquitin‐related proteome , 2005, Proteomics.

[8]  M. Mann,et al.  Mass spectrometry–based proteomics turns quantitative , 2005, Nature chemical biology.

[9]  Daniel Kaganovich,et al.  Protein quality control: chaperones culling corrupt conformations , 2005, Nature Cell Biology.

[10]  Thibault Mayor,et al.  Analysis of Polyubiquitin Conjugates Reveals That the Rpn10 Substrate Receptor Contributes to the Turnover of Multiple Proteasome Targets*S , 2005, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[11]  A. J. Gandolfi,et al.  Proteomic identification of ubiquitinated proteins from human cells expressing His‐tagged ubiquitin , 2005, Proteomics.

[12]  R. Deshaies,et al.  Two-step affinity purification of multiubiquitylated proteins from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2005, Methods in enzymology.

[13]  K. Madura Rad23 and Rpn10: perennial wallflowers join the melee. , 2004, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[14]  R. Deshaies,et al.  Multiubiquitin Chain Receptors Define a Layer of Substrate Selectivity in the Ubiquitin-Proteasome System , 2004, Cell.

[15]  D. Wolf,et al.  A genomic screen identifies Dsk2p and Rad23p as essential components of ER‐associated degradation , 2004, EMBO reports.

[16]  D. Finley,et al.  Rad23 and Rpn10 Serve as Alternative Ubiquitin Receptors for the Proteasome* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  J. Yates,et al.  A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[18]  R. Hartmann-Petersen,et al.  The Ubx2 and Ubx3 Cofactors Direct Cdc48 Activity to Proteolytic and Nonproteolytic Ubiquitin-Dependent Processes , 2004, Current Biology.

[19]  John R Yates,et al.  Applicability of Tandem Affinity Purification MudPIT to Pathway Proteomics in Yeast*S , 2004, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[20]  J. Yates,et al.  A correlation algorithm for the automated quantitative analysis of shotgun proteomics data. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[21]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Global analysis of protein expression in yeast , 2003, Nature.

[22]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast , 2003, Nature.

[23]  Steven P Gygi,et al.  A subset of membrane-associated proteins is ubiquitinated in response to mutations in the endoplasmic reticulum degradation machinery , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  John D. Storey,et al.  Statistical significance for genomewide studies , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Steven P Gygi,et al.  A proteomics approach to understanding protein ubiquitination , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[26]  D. Livingston,et al.  Polyubiquitination of p53 by a Ubiquitin Ligase Activity of p300 , 2003, Science.

[27]  Shu-Bing Qian,et al.  Quantitating protein synthesis, degradation, and endogenous antigen processing. , 2003, Immunity.

[28]  J. Zweier,et al.  A proteasomal ATPase subunit recognizes the polyubiquitin degradation signal , 2002, Nature.

[29]  Seth Sadis,et al.  Complementary whole-genome technologies reveal the cellular response to proteasome inhibition by PS-341 , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  J. Yates,et al.  DTASelect and Contrast: tools for assembling and comparing protein identifications from shotgun proteomics. , 2002, Journal of proteome research.

[31]  L. Falquet,et al.  A ubiquitin-interacting motif conserved in components of the proteasomal and lysosomal protein degradation systems. , 2001, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[32]  R. Young,et al.  Negative regulation of Gcn4 and Msn2 transcription factors by Srb10 cyclin-dependent kinase. , 2001, Genes & development.

[33]  J. Yates,et al.  Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[34]  J. Hoeijmakers,et al.  Interaction of hHR23 with S5a , 1999, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[35]  Angelika Amon,et al.  The regulation of Cdc20 proteolysis reveals a role for the APC components Cdc23 and Cdc27 during S phase and early mitosis , 1998, Current Biology.

[36]  Kim Nasmyth,et al.  The Polo‐like kinase Cdc5p and the WD‐repeat protein Cdc20p/fizzy are regulators and substrates of the anaphase promoting complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[37]  M. Glickman,et al.  Multiubiquitin Chain Binding and Protein Degradation Are Mediated by Distinct Domains within the 26 S Proteasome Subunit Mcb1* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[38]  L. Neckers,et al.  Rapid deubiquitination of nucleosomal histones in human tumor cells caused by proteasome inhibitors and stress response inducers: effects on replication, transcription, translation, and the cellular stress response. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[39]  I. Herskowitz,et al.  Phosphorylation- and ubiquitin-dependent degradation of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor Far1p in budding yeast. , 1997, Genes & development.

[40]  M. Glickman,et al.  The multiubiquitin-chain-binding protein Mcb1 is a component of the 26S proteasome in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and plays a nonessential, substrate-specific role in protein turnover , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[41]  K Nasmyth,et al.  TPR proteins required for anaphase progression mediate ubiquitination of mitotic B-type cyclins in yeast. , 1996, Molecular biology of the cell.

[42]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Ubiquitination of the G1 cyclin Cln2p by a Cdc34p‐dependent pathway. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[43]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[44]  J. Yates,et al.  An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database , 1994, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[45]  Q. Deveraux,et al.  A 26 S protease subunit that binds ubiquitin conjugates. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[46]  D. Wessel,et al.  A method for the quantitative recovery of protein in dilute solution in the presence of detergents and lipids. , 1984, Analytical biochemistry.