Comparison of Factor VIII concentrates in non-bleeding patients.

:  The comparison of in vivo recovery of Factor VIII:C of 3 Factor VIII concentrates in two consecutive cross-over studies on non-bleeding patients suffering from a severe hemophilia A showed in both instances equally strong differences; values more than twice as high were obtained with product C than with product A. The cause for this was found to lie in the different declarations of the products. With calculations based on the results of the in vitro testing of the concentrates, the recoveries of the 3 products largely converged. For this reason one should demand that declarations for all products be made in accordance with uniform rules. In both studies the mean values of the half elimination times (half-lives) of Factor VIII:C were in each case the same for the 3 products; but in study a) the mean value of half-lives was distinctly longer (14.1 hrs) than in study b) (10.5 hrs). The recovery, too, was higher in study a) (1.96 YO) per injected unit measured than in study b) (1.4%). This occurred despite identical conditions in both studies. An explanation for this was not found. There was a tendency towards a positive relationship between recovery and body weight. According to the applied cross-over design, the rank order of the Factor VIII:C recoveries found between the various concentrates were not blurred by the individual differences from patient to patient; nor were they blurred by the strong varying hematocrit values and other unknown factors relating to deviations in recovery, distribution time and elimination time from patient to patient. There can be no doubt as to the advantages of the cross-over methodoly when performing direct in vivo comparisons.

[1]  J. Over Methodology of the one-stage assay of Factor VIII (VIII:C). , 2009, Scandinavian journal of haematology. Supplementum.

[2]  C. Rizza Factor VIII concentrate: a comparison of manufacturers' assays and users' assays. Report of a survey carried out on behalf of the ICTH subcommittee on Factor VIII activities. , 1983, Thrombosis and haemostasis.

[3]  A. Aronstam,et al.  Effect of height and weight on the in vivo recovery of transfused factor VIII C. , 1982, Journal of clinical pathology.

[4]  M. Goudemand,et al.  Étude d'un concentré thérapeutique de facteur VIII/vWf préparé en circuit clos , 1982 .

[5]  P. Jones,et al.  The 'in vivo' survival characteristics of factor VIII procoagulant antigen (VIII:C Ag) in haemophilia A subjects. , 1982, Thrombosis research.

[6]  C. Rizza,et al.  FACTOR VIII CONCENTRATES: WHAT THE LABEL SAYS , 1981, The Lancet.

[7]  Kasper Ck Problems with the potency of factor VIII concentrate. , 1981 .

[8]  C. Prowse,et al.  In vivo Characteristics of Thaw Siphon Cryoprecipitate Compared to Other Factor VIII Preparations , 1980, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[9]  T. Kirkwood,et al.  In Vivo Recovery of Factor VIII: A Comparison of One-Stage and Two-Stage Assay Methods , 1979, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[10]  D. Aronson,et al.  Factor VIII (Antihemophilic Globulin) , 1979, Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis.

[11]  J. Sixma,et al.  Survival of 125iodine-labeled Factor VIII in normals and patients with classic hemophilia. Observations on the heterogeneity of human Factor VIII. , 1978, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[12]  T. Kirkwood,et al.  Identification of Sources of Inter-Laboratory Variation in Factor VIII Assay , 1977, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[13]  U. Hedner,et al.  Characteristics of Various Factor VIII Concentrates used in Treatment of Haemophilia A , 1977, British journal of haematology.

[14]  K. Brinkhous,et al.  Survival of Transfused Factor VIII in Hemophilic Patients Treated with Epsilon Aminocaproic Acid , 2003, Transfusion.

[15]  D. Frommel,et al.  Antibodies to factor VIII. V. Patterns of immune response to factor VIII in hemophilia A. , 1976, Blood.

[16]  C. Abildgaard,et al.  Early treatment of hemophilic hemarthroses with minimal dose of new factor 8 concentrate. , 1974, The Journal of pediatrics.

[17]  J. Sixma,et al.  Preparation and Infusion of Cryoprecipitate from Exercised Donors , 1973, British journal of haematology.

[18]  B. Bennett,et al.  Studies on the response of patients with classic hemophilia to transfusion with concentrates of antihemophilic factor. A difference in the half-life of antihemophilic factor as measured by procoagulant and immunologic techniques. , 1972, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[19]  G. Miller,et al.  Factor VIII Concentrates in Outpatient Therapy , 1972 .

[20]  M. Karpatkin,et al.  Clinical Investigation of Intermediate‐ and High‐Purity Antihaemophilic Factor (Factor VIII) Concentrates , 1971, British journal of haematology.

[21]  M. Verstraete,et al.  In vitro and in vivo Recovery of Cryoprecipitated Factor VIII , 1970 .

[22]  A. S. Douglas,et al.  Cryoprecipitate Therapy in Haemophilia , 1969, Scottish medical journal.

[23]  H. Roberts,et al.  A new high-potency glycine-precipitated antihemophilic factor (AHF) concentrate. Treatment of classical hemophilia and hemophilia with inhibitors. , 1968, JAMA.

[24]  D. Brown,et al.  Antihaemophilic globulin: preparation by an improved cryoprecipitation method and clinical use. , 1967, British medical journal.

[25]  C. Abildgaard,et al.  Treatment of hemophilia with glycine-precipitated factor 8. , 1966, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  K. Brinkhous HEMOPHILIA--PATHOPHYSIOLOGIC STUDIES AND THE EVOLUTION OF TRANSFUSION THERAPY. , 1964, American Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[27]  C. Abildgaard,et al.  The in vivo Longevity of Antihaemophilic Factor (Factor VIII) , 1964, British journal of haematology.

[28]  R. Biggs,et al.  The Fate of Prothrombin and Factors VIII, IX and X Transfused to Patients Deficient in these Factors , 1963, British journal of haematology.

[29]  Douglas As Antihemophilic globulin assay following plasma infusions in hemophilia. , 1958 .