The Kyoto Protocol and Sustainable Cities: Potential Use of Clean-Development Mechanism in Structuring Cities for Carbon-Efficient Transportation

This paper assesses the possibility for changing urban development patterns to reduce transportation greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The analysis was carried out as part of a larger project exploring the possibility of using the clean development mechanism (CDM) to reduce transportation GHG emissions in Santiago, Chile. The paper provides an overview of the analytical approach, which includes an integrated travel demand model with sensitivity to mesolevel land use variations, a method to generate optimal land use scenarios that relate to emission reductions, and a process to estimate the level of subsidies needed to produce those land use scenarios. Limitations to the approach and suggestions for future research are discussed. The paper concludes with an assessment of the results in the face of the fairly strict requirements for project development and implementation implied by the CDM.

[1]  G. B. Jamieson,et al.  Transportation and Land Use Structures , 1967 .

[2]  Gorman Gilbert,et al.  ENERGY, URBAN FORM AND TRANSPORTATION POLICY , 1974 .

[3]  Joseph L. Schofer,et al.  RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN TRANSPORTATION ENERGY CONSUMPTION AND URBAN STRUCTURE: RESULTS OF SIMULATION STUDIES , 1976 .

[4]  Melvyn D Cheslow,et al.  EFFECT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS ON TRANSPORTATION ENERGY USE , 1980 .

[5]  J L Schofer,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF NUCLEATED URBAN GROWTH PATTERNS ON TRANSPORTATION ENERGY CONSUMPTION , 1980 .

[6]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1985 .

[7]  J B Schneider,et al.  DEFINING RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN URBAN FORM AND TRAVEL ENERGY , 1985 .

[8]  Randall Crane,et al.  On Form versus Function: Will the New Urbanism Reduce Traffic, or Increase It? , 1995 .

[9]  F. Martínez MUSSA: Land Use Model for Santiago City , 1996 .

[10]  Susan L Handy,et al.  METHODOLOGIES FOR EXPLORING THE LINK BETWEEN URBAN FORM AND TRAVEL BEHAVIOR , 1996 .

[11]  R. Kitamura,et al.  A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area , 1997 .

[12]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Adjusting Computer Modeling Tools to Capture Effects of Smart Growth: Or “Poking at the Project Like a Lab Rat” , 2000 .

[13]  C. Zegras,et al.  Urban Growth Management for Mobility: The Case of the Santiago, Chile Metropolitan Region , 2000 .

[14]  Robert A. Johnston,et al.  Applying an Integrated Model to the Evaluation of Travel Demand Management Policies in the Sacramento Region , 2001 .

[15]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis , 2001 .

[16]  C. Bhat,et al.  Assessing Impact of Urban Form Measures on Nonwork Trip Mode Choice After Controlling for Demographic and Level-of-Service Effects , 2003 .

[17]  Vinod K. Natarajan,et al.  The Performance of Future ICE and Fuel Cell Powered Vehicles and Their Potential Fleet Impact , 2004 .

[18]  E. Ampt,et al.  On Best Practice in Continuous Large‐scale Mobility Surveys , 2004 .

[19]  Steve Winkelman,et al.  Getting on Track: Finding a Path for Transportation in the CDM , 2005 .

[20]  Pericles Christopher Zegras,et al.  Sustainable urban mobility : exploring the role of the built environment , 2005 .