Bribery games on inter-dependent regular networks

We examine a scenario of social conflict that is manifest during an interaction between government servants providing a service and citizens who are legally entitled to the service, using evolutionary game-theory in structured populations characterized by an inter-dependent network. Bribe-demands by government servants during such transactions, called harassment bribes, constitute a widespread form of corruption in many countries. We investigate the effect of varying bribe demand made by corrupt officials and the cost of complaining incurred by harassed citizens, on the proliferation of corrupt strategies in the population. We also examine how the connectivity of the various constituent networks affects the spread of corrupt officials in the population. We find that incidents of bribery can be considerably reduced in a network-structured populations compared to mixed populations. Interestingly, we also find that an optimal range for the connectivity of nodes in the citizen’s network (signifying the degree of influence a citizen has in affecting the strategy of other citizens in the network) as well as the interaction network aids in the fixation of honest officers. Our results reveal the important role of network structure and connectivity in asymmetric games.

[1]  Tito Cordella,et al.  Asymmetric Punishment as an Instrument of Corruption Control , 2014 .

[2]  K. Basu Why, for a Class of Bribes, the Act of Giving a Bribe should be Treated as Legal , 2011 .

[3]  Mandar P. Oak,et al.  Legalization of Bribe Giving when Bribe Type Is Endogenous , 2015 .

[4]  R. Lewontin ‘The Selfish Gene’ , 1977, Nature.

[5]  Dirk C. Keene Acknowledgements , 1975 .

[6]  C. Hauert,et al.  Volunteering as Red Queen Mechanism for Cooperation in Public Goods Games , 2002, Science.

[7]  TTEEYO,et al.  Letting the briber go free : an experiment on mitigating harassment bribes , 2014 .

[8]  Matjaz Perc,et al.  Statistical physics of crime: A review , 2014, Physics of life reviews.

[9]  H. Ohtsuki,et al.  A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks , 2006, Nature.

[10]  Michael McBride,et al.  Criminal Defectors Lead to the Emergence of Cooperation in an Experimental, Adversarial Game , 2013, PloS one.

[11]  Matjaž Perc,et al.  Phase transitions in models of human cooperation , 2016 .

[12]  Karl Sigmund,et al.  Punish or perish? Retaliation and collaboration among humans. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[13]  Supratim Sengupta,et al.  Bribe and Punishment: An Evolutionary Game-Theoretic Analysis of Bribery , 2015, PloS one.

[14]  Philip M. Dixon,et al.  Speeding Up Ecological and Evolutionary Computations in R; Essentials of High Performance Computing for Biologists , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[15]  Alex McAvoy,et al.  Asymmetric Evolutionary Games , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[16]  C. Hauert,et al.  Replicator dynamics for optional public good games. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Interdependent network reciprocity in evolutionary games , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[18]  M. Keeling,et al.  The effects of local spatial structure on epidemiological invasions , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  Yamir Moreno,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics on interdependent populations. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[20]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics , 1998 .

[21]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics on graphs , 2005, Nature.

[22]  S. Ferrari,et al.  Author contributions , 2021 .

[23]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  On the dynamics of asymmetric games , 1991 .

[24]  M. Nowak,et al.  Another battle of the sexes: the consequences of sexual asymmetry in mating costs and predation risk in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  Exploration dynamics in evolutionary games , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  J Hofbauer,et al.  The "battle of the sexes": a genetic model with limit cycle behavior. , 1987, Theoretical population biology.

[27]  H. Ohtsuki,et al.  Breaking the symmetry between interaction and replacement in evolutionary dynamics on graphs. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[28]  David G. Rand,et al.  The evolution of antisocial punishment in optional public goods games. , 2011, Nature communications.

[29]  Martin Dufwenberg,et al.  Legalizing Bribe Giving , 2012 .

[30]  Akira Sasaki,et al.  Statistical Mechanics of Population: The Lattice Lotka-Volterra Model , 1992 .

[31]  H. Ohtsuki,et al.  The replicator equation on graphs. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[32]  A. Sasaki,et al.  A Lattice Model for Population Biology , 1987 .

[33]  Katharina Weiss,et al.  Game Theory And Animal Behavior , 2016 .

[34]  A. Sasaki,et al.  The evolution of parasite virulence and transmission rate in a spatially structured population. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[35]  M. Nowak Evolutionary Dynamics: Exploring the Equations of Life , 2006 .

[36]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Antisocial pool rewarding does not deter public cooperation , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  Dmitry Ryvkin,et al.  Does competition among public offi cials reduce corruption ? An experiment ∗ , 2013 .

[38]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Evolutionary Establishment of Moral and Double Moral Standards through Spatial Interactions , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[39]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Correlation of positive and negative reciprocity fails to confer an evolutionary advantage: Phase transitions to elementary strategies , 2013, ArXiv.

[40]  M. Short,et al.  Cooperation and punishment in an adversarial game: how defectors pave the way to a peaceful society. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[41]  Martin A Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary graph theory: breaking the symmetry between interaction and replacement. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[42]  M. Nowak,et al.  Fairness versus reason in the ultimatum game. , 2000, Science.

[44]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Evolution of public cooperation on interdependent networks: The impact of biased utility functions , 2012, ArXiv.

[45]  Matjaz Perc,et al.  Spreading of cooperative behaviour across interdependent groups , 2013, Scientific Reports.