A weak variant of Hindman’s Theorem stronger than Hilbert’s Theorem

Hirst investigated a natural restriction of Hindman’s Finite Sums Theorem—called Hilbert’s Theorem—and proved it equivalent over $$\mathbf {RCA}_0$$RCA0 to the Infinite Pigeonhole Principle for all colors. This gave the first example of a natural restriction of Hindman’s Theorem provably much weaker than Hindman’s Theorem itself. We here introduce another natural restriction of Hindman’s Theorem—which we name the Adjacent Hindman’s Theorem with apartness—and prove it to be provable from Ramsey’s Theorem for pairs and strictly stronger than Hirst’s Hilbert’s Theorem. The lower bound is obtained by a direct combinatorial implication from the Adjacent Hindman’s Theorem with apartness to the Increasing Polarized Ramsey’s Theorem for pairs introduced by Dzhafarov and Hirst. In the Adjacent Hindman’s Theorem homogeneity is required only for finite sums of adjacent elements.

[1]  C. Chong,et al.  THE METAMATHEMATICS OF STABLE RAMSEY'S THEOREM FOR PAIRS , 2014 .

[2]  Jeffry L. Hirst,et al.  The polarized Ramsey’s theorem , 2009, Arch. Math. Log..

[3]  Stephen G. Simpson,et al.  Subsystems of second order arithmetic , 1999, Perspectives in mathematical logic.

[4]  Andreas Blass SOME QUESTIONS ARISING FROM HINDMAN'S THEOREM , 2005 .

[5]  Neil Hindman The existence of certain ultra-filters on and a conjecture of Graham and Rothschild , 1972 .

[6]  Leszek Aleksander Kolodziejczyk,et al.  New Bounds on the Strength of Some Restrictions of Hindman's Theorem , 2017, CiE.

[7]  Neil Hindman,et al.  Finite Sums from Sequences Within Cells of a Partition of N , 1974, J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A.

[8]  Carl G. Jockusch,et al.  On the strength of Ramsey's theorem for pairs , 2001, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[9]  M. Rossberg,et al.  The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic , 2015 .

[10]  Imre Leader,et al.  Open Problems in Partition Regularity , 2003, Comb. Probab. Comput..

[11]  Stephen G. Simpson,et al.  Logical analysis of some theorems of combinatorics and topological dynamics , 1987 .

[12]  Antonio Montalbán,et al.  Open Questions in Reverse Mathematics , 2011, The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic.

[13]  Steffen Lempp,et al.  On the role of the collection principle for Sigma^0_2-formulas in second-order reverse mathematics , 2010 .

[14]  Henryk Michalewski,et al.  The logical strength of Büchi's decidability theorem , 2019, Log. Methods Comput. Sci..

[15]  Antonio Montalb An OPEN QUESTIONS IN REVERSE MATHEMATICS , 2010 .

[16]  Carl G. Jockusch,et al.  Effectiveness of Hindman's Theorem for Bounded Sums , 2017, Computability and Complexity.

[17]  C. Chong,et al.  ON THE ROLE OF THE COLLECTION PRINCIPLE FOR Σ2-FORMULAS IN SECOND-ORDER REVERSE MATHEMATICS , 2009 .

[18]  Rodney G. Downey,et al.  A Δ20 set with no infinite low subset in either it or its complement , 2001, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[19]  Ludovic Patey,et al.  The proof-theoretic strength of Ramsey's theorem for pairs and two colors. , 2016, 1601.00050.

[20]  Jeffry L. Hirst Hilbert versus Hindman , 2012, Arch. Math. Log..

[21]  Lorenzo Carlucci,et al.  “Weak yet strong” restrictions of Hindman’s Finite Sums Theorem , 2016 .

[22]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.